Miscellaneous monarchy-related topics of interest

CJ Osborne
August 4, 2018 at 5:17 pm

Who can forget where they were when Diana was killed?

In the Pacific Northwest of the USA, we are 9 hours earlier than Paris. It was late afternoon on a hot late summer day, and we were doing slow laps in our pool when our daughter called out the back door that “Diana was in an automobile accident in Paris, but she is was fine, with only a broken leg.” That was a strange announcement for a “special report” which are usually reserved for things like earthquakes, plane crashes, or heads of state in extreme conditions. Yet, by the time we were done with our swim and back in the house, the news had taken a much more ominous tone; that Diana was “in intensive care” and shortly thereafter, it was announced that Diana was dead. How does a middle-aged woman die from a broken leg?

At about 8PM, I heard a SINGLE RADIO broadcast that described EXACTLY how the accident happened. (The tow truck in the Left lane, with the vertical I-beam, and being forced over by the “little white car.”) The announcer had a familiar British accent, so I assumed it was a satellite feed that was being picked up by a local station. I recognize the voice (but can’t remember his name). He described a straight-forward operation, clearly premeditated, and with the purpose of killing the occupants.

However, the following broadcasts, for days on end, became completely different; they ALL involved the paparazzi, even arresting men who had nothing to do with the “accident,” and then blaming Henri Paul for being drunk as a skunk (when he looked sober as a judge on the available tapes, just moments before he drove Diana and Dodi and Trevor Rees-Jones). The “investigation” into the accident in the tunnel with all sorts of engineers, had reasonable people contorting ideas like pretzels (just like the single bullet theory of JFK’s killing). This is what governments do when they cannot allow the truth to come out.

Why did the ambulance move so slowly and even stop repeatedly, instead of taking her directly to an operating theater? (She could have been carried on a stretcher by foot, faster than the ambulance traveled.)
Why are there conflicting statements between the SAMU workers?
Why can some SAMU workers not be identified or even found?
Unknown doctors “told them to wait.”
Unknown doctors “told them to stabilize the princess” before proceeding. (HOW do you “stabilize” someone in full cardiac arrest?)
Why was she NOT taken to Val-de-Grâce, a Level One Trauma Center, in the 5th arrondissement, as is called for when heads of state, generals, and celebrities need care (certainly Diana qualified)?
Why was she NOT taken to the American Hospital?
WHY was she taken to the Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, in the 13th arrondissement (at twice the distance, plus they had to call staff to come)?
Why was the “blood alcohol” test for Henri Paul so extreme (given that he did not drink to excess EVER and certainly not when he was on call) taken on the same night that a chronic alcoholic ALSO died, considering that the sample was then conveniently lost, but AFTER the extreme numbers were attributed to Henri Paul?
What were the numbers for the chronic alcoholic that died? With two men there have to be two different numbers, but there was only a single high number recorded, and it was attributed to Henri Paul. (His poor parents had to LIVE with the results of that LIE until the day they died. Their son was MURDERED and then BLAMED for “causing the accident that killed Diana, and Dodi, the SON of his boss.)

The photograph of the Mercedes, from the top, with the crush so bad that the battery was shoved into the drivers compartment, makes it clear that the ORIGINAL REPORT was valid! NOTHING else could have made that same bending of metal.

A couple of years later, we went to the Ritz (on the same weekend of the year) and time of night, and we drove the route time after time. LOOK at the columns! LOOK at the traffic! LOOK at the curve of the road! It could NOT have happened the way that has been described. It is a foolish explanation that does not pass the test of laugh, logic, or logistics. The physical layout does not support the lie.

I heard the facts in that single broadcast, but truth also died with that single broadcast. The “voice” of that broadcast has either died of old age (during the past 20 years years) or was “silenced” because he knew too much. All in all, it is SICKENING! Her death may have been tragic, but there is NOTHING more tragic than LIES and having grown, responsible, adults TELLING LIES to save their skins instead of telling the truth and allowing the truth to stand.