|
Post by Lavendel on Jul 10, 2018 7:55:11 GMT
I watched the videos and what i noticed is that; all were iin disconnect. The philip not coming must have been one of the reason. It was tense. When they arrived Charles camila looked tired . William walked with the children almost holding them hostage. Charlotte was in a bad mood she shouted at the journalists.
When they met the clergy at the entry kate was alone behind William with the baby. But nobody welcomed her. The second clergy after greeting william and the kids , he ignored kate behind him and turned to greet meg and harry. Harry was holding megs hand as let go at this moment Kate noticed nobody was on her she ran to arch of COE and started bubbling stuff and the arch didnt touch the baby or her hand. They sawyed . As the mother with the baby she was almost alone as she entered church. She was like on drugs not aware of the mood of others.
Since meg and harry were last to enter they came out first and had some cameras time. Harry was explaining the baptism to her and she was modeling her look.
The god parents looked misplaced and disconnected. There was mo leading force like the queen commands.
All looked nervously around hand had to fend for themselves.
But what we saw yesterday will replace the queen. This was the groupings of heir to the throne and his family. Shows without the llibet and Philip things will be dull. Charlie and camila didnt manage to control the situation. Everyone looked afraid of william who walked tall on them using the kids as Mantel.
He is really a bully? Around him everyone was cowing. Its like they were forced to choose the side of windsor lillbe or cambridges . But still had to attend
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Sept 17, 2018 19:23:14 GMT
Harry & Meghan look strange
This recent picture makes them look a bit sinister. Prince Harry reminds me of Mark Gatiss in The League of Gentlemen:
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Sept 18, 2018 7:12:08 GMT
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Oct 6, 2018 6:20:29 GMT
Mark Gatiss and Prince Harry again
This started out as a joke, but now I am beginning to wonder! Mark Gatiss as posted elsewhere was in the TV series Sherlock and has red hair and pale eyes.
|
|
|
Post by Lavendel on Oct 6, 2018 8:48:36 GMT
Mark Gatiss and Prince Harry again
This started out as a joke, but now I am beginning to wonder! Mark Gatiss as posted elsewhere was in the TV series Sherlock and has red hair and pale eyes. What do you think? Related? He is wearing a orange white blue shirt. What are your thoughts UnseenI
|
|
|
Post by truthseeker on Oct 6, 2018 9:23:13 GMT
Mark Gatiss mentioned that he is "descended from the ancient kings of Ireland".
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Oct 13, 2018 6:33:46 GMT
What’s up with Prince Harry?
He looks miserable, haunted even, in many pictures these days. I wonder why.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Oct 15, 2018 6:26:10 GMT
Mark Gatiss and Kate Middleton
One of Mark Gatiss’ League of Gentlemen characters has a superficial likeness to Prince Harry. This one looks a bit like someone we know too:
|
|
|
Post by truthseeker on Oct 20, 2018 14:39:13 GMT
It's strange how much a change of hair can change some faces.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Oct 29, 2018 7:07:52 GMT
It's strange how much a change of hair can change some faces.
It certainly is. A good actor can transform themselves into many different characters. I know that some people believe that certain celebrities have been replaced. I have also seen some conspiracy theorists allege that several celebrities are played by the same actor! They ignore pictures where they are seen in public together or on the same day in different continents. I am surprised that no one has accused Mark Gatiss of playing the parts of Prince Harry and Kate Middleton!
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Nov 3, 2018 19:42:00 GMT
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Dec 16, 2018 18:08:58 GMT
Two awful Christmas card pictures
These pictures have been reproduced and discussed in many places. Many sites show cropped versions, probably just for reasons of space. The Sussex original is easy to find, but not the Cambridge one. I am sure I saw a version where their Wellington boots are visible, but I can’t find it now. We need someone like transformer to list all the strange features. Prince Harry and Prince George’s left legs look odd. Does Prince George’s head match his body and is it just a coincidence that his stance resembles the branch behind him? Maybe this is something he learned from his ballet lessons at school! It is a little like the picture of the hanged man. Princess Charlotte looks a little strange too, and Kate’s smile looks forced. All the above is nothing compared with the total inappropriateness of the Sussex card. Whose ‘good idea’ was this?
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Jul 14, 2019 19:08:43 GMT
magpiejack it is not just the picture you highlighted that is strange. Many of the pictures from the recent polo match look rather odd for one reason or another. Back on the CC forum we caught the DM photo-shopping people in to make the crowds look larger - and so did their people. Some of them were giants! Then there was the Big Car! I am not sure where the polo pictures originated. Some could be stills from a video. I don’t know who did any original and subsequent doctoring, but it looks as though someone did. Pictures are cobbled together, people are moved around to make them look closer to others and bits are cropped off. Background people appear and disappear. Just look at the Big Man in this version of your ‘finger picture’:
|
|
|
Post by magpiejack on Jul 14, 2019 19:27:01 GMT
magpiejack it is not just the picture you highlighted that is strange. Many of the pictures from the recent polo match look rather odd for one reason or another. Back on the CC forum we caught the DM photo-shopping people in to make the crowds look larger - and so did their people. Some of them were giants! Then there was the Big Car! I am not sure where the polo pictures originated. Some could be stills from a video. I don’t know who did any original and subsequent doctoring, but it looks as though someone did. Pictures are cobbled together, people are moved around to make them look closer to others and bits are cropped off. Background people appear and disappear. Just look at the Big Man in this version of your ‘finger picture’: I see what you mean UnseenI - Big Man? He looks in that perspective to be at least 7 feet tall! In this photo it is someone pointing as you can see his arm and a navy jacket sleeve. His hand is still two very different colours though!
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Jul 15, 2019 7:12:08 GMT
Another strange picture from the polo match
A different Big Man and someone’s elbow:
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Jul 15, 2019 18:03:18 GMT
The bigger picture
Here they all are again, with more details. I wonder whether ‘pointing the finger’ and ‘giving the elbow’ have special meanings in these pictures of Meghan!
|
|
|
Post by magpiejack on Jul 16, 2019 9:26:30 GMT
The bigger picture
Here they all are again, with more details. I wonder whether ‘pointing the finger’ and ‘giving the elbow’ have special meanings in these pictures of Meghan! Or, 'a gun to her head'? Maybe to Harry's head, if he's pointing towards the polo field? You normally clench your fist and stick two fingers out to make a gun symbol with your hand, but that would be too obvious. This sounds rather crude, but when I first saw the different darker parts of the hand in the original photo that I posted, I thought of a man's bits, to put it politely... Maybe secrets from the past that could be explosive? The picture has definitely been manipulated for a reason.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Jul 16, 2019 19:56:53 GMT
What a strange picture.
I can’t see any Ancient Egyptian symbols in this one, but Kate looks small, Meghan medium sized and the men big. Were three images used to create one picture?
|
|
|
Post by magpiejack on Jul 17, 2019 8:24:20 GMT
Photo skuduggeryMy plans for an early night last night were interrupted as I found some info that took me down the rabbit hole in a big way. I don't do social media and it took me to sites that I don't normally visit. There is evidence that the christening photo was taken at 10.56pm on 8 May, the same day as the first two Archie photos were taken. The photo was modified on 6 July. The evidence is from the photo metadata, which I tried to check but I’m not a techie so I’m out of my depth there. However, it seems that it has been checked by several people and they’ve all found the same date. It is possible that the date may now have been changed, as I have seen evidence for a photo for another controversial event that has had the metadata date subsequently changed in order to synchronise with the official line, but screenshots were taken of the original date. One explanation for the 8 May date was that this is the date when the software was downloaded, but here is a counter-argument: “I am a professional graphic designer with 25 years of experience, a BFA with a concentration in graphic design, I graduated at the top of my class, I’ve run two in house design departments, and I can tell you that the date has NOTHING to do with a firmware or software update. It indicates the date and time the original photo was taken before being moved to a computer and any modifications were done. Period. May 8th. The same date the photo of HM, Archie, MM, Doria, etc.. . was published. THAT DAY. Wow. There is some bizarre reaction to this revelation. So telling! EDIT: And BTW…far too many people have checked for themselves to be fooled by this. The photo was taken on May 8, 2019. What was done after that – who knows? It was moved to a computer and last modified on July 6. People can see for themselves…And THEY have.” Two other noteworthy points is that Harry appears to be wearing the same suit in both sets of photos and Meghan appears to be wearing the same shoes: It was pointed out that Kate arrived for the christening in a blue outfit, but her photo outfit is pink. The Cambridges arrived at 1045 for the 11am christening, they usually take about half an hour or so, then the photo was supposedly taken at 1154. When did she have time to change, and why would she do that? Did she deliberately wear a different outfit to give us a clue? I don’t have a design cell in my body so I don’t have the eye for this, but a lot of people have called out the christening photo as photoshopped. One point made is that William and Kate seem to be blurry in comparison to the others, and one commentator said that there are loads of telling points and left a cryptic comment “just look over Camilla’s shoulder” - but I don’t see it! Maybe someone else can spot it? For my part, I would say that the black line by Meghan's upper right arm looks too dark to be shadow. Finally, some have said that the room looks artificially lit, which would accord with a time of 10.56pm when there would be no natural light. So, all this begs the question - does this explain why in the first two photos, a lot of people said that it looked as if she was holding a doll, and the reason why the baby's face was obscured? Is that why the 'feet' photo was called out to be that of an older infant? I wonder what Archie looks like now, if he really is 3 months older than in this photo.
|
|
|
Post by magpiejack on Jul 17, 2019 11:08:16 GMT
William and Kate's arrival at Windsor CastleHere is a picture of William and Kate arriving at Windsor Castle for the christening. You can see Kate in the passenger seat, wearing blue in something with a lower neckline than the pink dress. I did think that William's shirt looked a light blue in this photo, whereas he wore a white shirt in the christening photo, but I think that's because of the tinted windows. Tinted windows wouldn't turn pink into blue, though. One more thing that I have thought of, I don't know if it's been commented on elsewhere - Diana's sisters were in the christening photo. Where was Earl Spencer? The Express suggests that it's because the Queen was upset at his comments at Diana's funeral, but the Queen and Phillip weren't at the christening. (Just noticed - my earlier post's title should read 'skulduggery', not skuduggery!)
|
|
|
Post by magpiejack on Jul 17, 2019 16:07:06 GMT
“Just look over Camilla’s shoulder”
I've had a long and detailed look “over Camilla’s shoulder” on an enlarged image, and I think that refers to Charles as I have spotted two things. Firstly, everyone else seems to have a shadow falling to the right of their neck and shoulder, but not Charles. There is only a slight shadow on Camilla that I think is caused by her hat.
Secondly, and I think this is a real giveaway - look at his hand resting on the back of the seat. It looks as if the finger next to his thumb has the top chopped off, it's far too short. In fact, all his left hand fingers look too short in proportion to his thumb. Looking at other photos where his hands are visible, they seem normally proportioned, so the tip of this finger should be lower than his thumb.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Jul 17, 2019 17:18:30 GMT
Christening picture magpiejack now I am more confused than ever! I too know nothing about the technical side of shopping pictures and even I had the right tools and equipment I wouldn’t know what to do with them, but considering everything else I can well believe that this one was put together from various sources. I still can’t get over the panama hat! May 8th you say. So maybe Meghan’s people killed two birds with one stone and prepared the official christening portrait in addition to the first pictures of Archie. Meghan could have put another dress on for the second performance. The Cornwalls were in Germany at the time, but their images could have been shopped in. Maybe Meghan used a recent picture of Archie but older ones of other people. I just don’t know enough to be sure. The date resets every time I take the batteries out of my (very old) camera and I don’t always update it, so many pics I take have an old date on them. I doubt whether anything like this would apply to professionals and their equipment though.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Jul 17, 2019 17:20:38 GMT
Picture from the photo-call on May 8th
We have mentioned this elsewhere, but there is one picture that definitely belongs here as something isn’t right about it. Is Doria too warmly dressed? Maybe she is just used to a much warmer environment. I found a picture of the Queen opening the Windsor Horse Show in 2018. Are her clothes the same ones she is wearing to meet Archie?
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Jul 17, 2019 17:24:53 GMT
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Jul 17, 2019 17:30:30 GMT
Keeping up the good work
“My plans for an early night last night were interrupted as I found some info that took me down the rabbit hole in a big way.”
It is very clear that investigations could easily turn into a full-time job and take over our lives.
However, not only are we helping to uncover the truth, we are developing research skills and adding to our knowledge of history etc.
|
|
|
Post by magpiejack on Jul 17, 2019 18:53:43 GMT
Keeping up the good work
“My plans for an early night last night were interrupted as I found some info that took me down the rabbit hole in a big way.” It is very clear that investigations could easily turn into a full-time job and take over our lives. However, not only are we helping to uncover the truth, we are developing research skills and adding to our knowledge of history etc. At least I was able to have a lie-in this morning UnseenI ! It was fascinating, one lead puts you on another trail, and before you know it it's well past midnight. So - Charles and Camilla were in Germany on 8 May. Wow, the picture is a big porkie then. The Queen and Phillip pic - definitely photoshopped, the shadows are all wrong. Your comment about the Queen's clothes - it does look like the same cardigan, though the skirt's a different colour and pattern. Both skirts are the tweedy country type that she seems to favour. "Maybe Meghan used a recent picture of Archie but older ones of other people." It has been suggested that it was a picture of Archie as of 8 May 2019, hence all the secrecy about the birth and keeping him hidden. Another oddity that I came across was the traditional birth announcement posted outside Buckingham Palace. Traditionally it is signed by four doctors who attend the birth, but on Archie's those signatures are missing. There are also some oddities about the birth certificate too - maybe another time for that, though one thing struck me when I first saw it, his name is given as Harry but his legal name is Henry (unless he's had it changed). It's supposed to be legal names on birth, marriage and death certificates.
|
|
|
Post by magpiejack on Jul 18, 2019 6:25:35 GMT
No new outfit?It looks as if Charles and Camilla's photoshopped images were taken from pictures of Louis' christening; they seem to be wearing the same outfits.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Jul 18, 2019 7:41:42 GMT
The christening picture yet again
“It was fascinating, one lead puts you on another trail, and before you know it it's well past midnight.”
As Sherlock Holmes would say, “The game’s afoot!” It is very exciting to be on the trail of something big.
“So - Charles and Camilla were in Germany on 8 May. Wow, the picture is a big porkie then.”
I am getting even more confused now! The picture is officially dated July so there is no suggestion that they were in the UK on May 8th.
As for the outfits, I was thinking of that but they all look alike to me anyway. The colours and styles are much the same in many formal pictures.
Camilla’s hat and neckline look slightly different to me.
|
|
|
Post by magpiejack on Jul 18, 2019 15:45:35 GMT
The christening picture yet again
I am getting even more confused now! The picture is officially dated July so there is no suggestion that they were in the UK on May 8th. As for the outfits, I was thinking of that but they all look alike to me anyway. The colours and styles are much the same in many formal pictures. Camilla’s hat and neckline look slightly different to me. Sorry if it was confusing, I tried to write it as straightforwardly as possible, but it was a lot of info! Yes, the photo was released to the press in July and purported to be of the July christening, but the metadata shows that the photo was taken in May (when C & C were in Germany). The photo was altered in July. To be honest, I don't take an interest in fashion so details go over my head, but having a quick look through Google images it looks like she does vary her outfits, necklines, jewellery and hats for formal occasions. It seems odd that they are both dressed exactly the same on both occasions, and I note that she is wearing the same necklace and shoes, so maybe images from Louis' christening were used for the photoshop. I agree that Camilla’s hat and neckline look slightly different, however she is walking in a slightly stooped position in one photo and sitting straight-backed in the other, which would alter where the neckline sits. The hat looks a bit different, but both details could have been photoshopped. I've just noticed that there seems to be some embroidery detail around the neckline of her dress for the Louis christening, but that could have been easily edited out.
|
|
|
Post by Lavendel on Jul 18, 2019 16:31:01 GMT
Hi everyone following the trail. i just wish to add something i just noticed. she has black hair, wearing a white dress, gold brown buttons, the carpet is red and shoes are gold. the baby in white too this brings to light the red white black communication a very hollywood connected colour. they are communication to the other world. harry is wearing grey which is a light black, white shirt and red carpet and shoes a golden brown. with a blue tie these are masonic colours
|
|