UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Dec 3, 2017 6:25:37 GMT
A strange picture of Kate’s neck
There is a picture of a strange bulge in Prince Harry’s neck above; now it is Kate’s turn. Is it just botched photo-shopping? From August 2016:
|
|
|
Post by Liberty on Dec 4, 2017 20:36:48 GMT
Newborn Princess Charlotte: doll or baby?
When Princess Charlotte was first introduced to the public, which was when the Cambridges were leaving the hospital in May 2015, some commenters said that she looked like – or even was - a doll. Many new babies could be mistaken for dolls when they are asleep – I have seen this for myself – but her position and the casual way she is being held here do seem rather odd: We have some Masonic colours here too. There used to be videos on youtube where a siren went off whilst Kate was holding her. Charlotte didn't move. The commentator says "This little doll"!? referring to Charlotte. At that point I was 100% convinced that she was a real doll. Unsurprisingly the two videos showing this have been removed. In any event the remaining videos have a small crowd of sugars hooping and hollering and the baby does not respond. If babies slept that heavily why do parents make an effort to be quite when they put their kids down? Either it's a doll or they drugged their baby, which ever one is true, it's not on. Are you guys going to do photo analysis of the Markle pictures that are being dumped all over the DM? The insight you shared on the Middleton of yesteryear photos was very interesting.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Dec 5, 2017 7:01:24 GMT
Liberty I am not convinced that Charlotte was a doll when she was first introduced to the public, and I am not convinced that she was not! It is the same with Kate Middleton's age: I am not convinced that she is seven years older than her official age, and I am not convinced that she is not; she certainly looks it though. The burden of proof lies on the claimant, but we can't take things at face value or trust the official stories. The many pictures of young Kate were of interest for several reasons, her apparent age and health and some big anomalies for example. These factors mostly don't apply to the many pictures of Meghan. I have put a few pictures of her on here, but I am not much good at analysing images and detecting photo-shopping. If I find any more of particular interest, I will add them. There is still a big backlog of information from the old forum to go on here. A hard winter is expected, which will mean more time indoors, which means more time for this forum.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Dec 5, 2017 19:50:01 GMT
Another strange picture of Prince Harry
His left leg looks odd, and yet again we have a missing left foot. Some people believe that these weird pictures contain coded messages from the DM. If so, I would very much like to know what they are telling us!
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Dec 6, 2017 17:02:25 GMT
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Dec 6, 2017 17:04:17 GMT
A treat from today’s Daily Mail
Just for fun. The DM often plays around with pictures, perhaps just for convenience. In January, we found a series of images that were very obviously photo-shopped: they contained some small and some giant people. The pictures looked ridiculous. In one case, the giants were probably added to make the number of spectators at Sandringham look larger. Here is a reminder: For a moment I thought that they done it again today:
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Dec 10, 2017 11:20:33 GMT
Thomas Markle Senior’s alleged huge lottery win
More on a topic that was first mentioned in the Royal Facade thread. Avacyn something about this story seems suspicious to me, perhaps because it makes me think of the questions about the origin of the Middleton money. The story originated with Thomas Markle Junior in a recent interview with the Mail: “Her older half brother, Tom Jr, recently revealed their father, Tom Sr, won an estimated £565,000 ($750,000) in a Californian state lottery in 1990 when the actress was just nine years old. ‘If Meg marries Harry she’ll have won the lottery of life but dad winning the lottery helped us all,’ the 51-year-told told the Mail on Sunday. ‘That money allowed Meg to go to the best schools and get the best training. Meg is someone who has always had laser focus. She knows what she wants and she doesn't stop until she gets it,’ he added.” I do wonder whether this story is a cover for something and a damage control exercise, similar to the explanation that the Middletons got their money from Party Pieces. Kate too didn’t stop until she caught her prince. Meghan’s father is a recluse who does not give interviews, so we can’t expect any further information from him. Maybe he really did win the lottery; maybe the money for the expensive education came from somewhere else. In any case, he was well paid at the time. Something isn’t right here.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Dec 10, 2017 11:22:05 GMT
More about the Markle lottery win
“In 1990, Tom Snr won the lottery. Officials at the Californian lottery could find no official record of the win, but both Tom Jnr and another relative confirmed it. 'Dad rang me one day and told me to come over. There was a lump on his bed under a blanket. I pulled it back and saw stacks of money there. My first reaction was, 'What did you do?' He started laughing and said, 'I won the lottery!' ' The money helped send Meghan to the $16,000-a-year Immaculate Heart Catholic School, one of LA's finest, followed by Northwestern University where she studied drama: 'Meg won scholarships to other universities but she wanted to go to Northwestern so she did,' her brother adds. 'The money helped.' Yet last year Tom Snr declared bankruptcy, which his son blames on the poor investments made by a business partner.” Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-5096335/Meghan-Markle-s-brother-lottery-win-set-stardom.html#ixzz50qiGWJVZ Maybe the money on the bed story is true, but it does not prove that the money came from a lottery win. Stacks of money? Surely the winnings would have been paid by cheque or transfer, even in 1990?
|
|
Avacyn
Project Manager
Posts: 11,234
|
Post by Avacyn on Dec 12, 2017 23:23:50 GMT
I know that nowadays, you get a lot of help with your win. A new account is set up, specifically for that win. You get advice on how to manage it, too.
Cash? No. I don't buy it. He was paid off, and it was likely a start point. There would have been installments along the way. Look at where the money was spent. It was a cover, and They wanted her in that school. It is likely a training ground in some way. Another two I suspect to be like that are Buckley School (California) and Campbell Hall School.
My take on it.
|
|
Avacyn
Project Manager
Posts: 11,234
|
Post by Avacyn on Dec 12, 2017 23:29:20 GMT
A strange picture of Kate’s neck
There is a picture of a strange bulge in Prince Harry’s neck above; now it is Kate’s turn. Is it just botched photo-shopping? From August 2016: Merlin's beard - just what the blazing heck is wrong with her neck?!?!? They have to have messed with her neck - and only her neck. This is not a composite picture, or anything like that. I took a closer look, all the elements match up. So... why pinch and stretch her neck like that? That is what they have to have done. It's like they created a really bad Adam's apple on her. Something certainly isn't right!
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Dec 13, 2017 7:07:05 GMT
I know that nowadays, you get a lot of help with your win. A new account is set up, specifically for that win. You get advice on how to manage it, too. Cash? No. I don't buy it. He was paid off, and it was likely a start point. There would have been installments along the way. Look at where the money was spent. It was a cover, and They wanted her in that school. It is likely a training ground in some way. Another two I suspect to be like that are Buckley School (California) and Campbell Hall School. My take on it. Meghan Markle's half-brother looks a bit dodgy to me. It is possible that he had a 'good idea' and came up with the lottery win explanation because he thought that journalists might ask awkward questions about the family finances. He then embellished it with the story of the huge amounts of cash in the house in the hope of adding some credibility, but for me it has the opposite effect. If the State Lottery really has no record of this win, it is enough for me; I now no longer believe in the big win. There may have been a small win and a much smaller amount of cash I suppose... If Markle Sr. was receiving payments, they might well have been made in cash but not in one huge lump sum in advance.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Dec 13, 2017 9:10:37 GMT
|
|
Avacyn
Project Manager
Posts: 11,234
|
Post by Avacyn on Dec 14, 2017 0:29:03 GMT
I know that nowadays, you get a lot of help with your win. A new account is set up, specifically for that win. You get advice on how to manage it, too. Cash? No. I don't buy it. He was paid off, and it was likely a start point. There would have been installments along the way. Look at where the money was spent. It was a cover, and They wanted her in that school. It is likely a training ground in some way. Another two I suspect to be like that are Buckley School (California) and Campbell Hall School. My take on it. Meghan Markle's half-brother looks a bit dodgy to me. It is possible that he had a 'good idea' and came up with the lottery win explanation because he thought that journalists might ask awkward questions about the family finances. He then embellished it with the story of the huge amounts of cash in the house in the hope of adding some credibility, but for me it has the opposite effect. If the State Lottery really has no record of this win, it is enough for me; I now no longer believe in the big win. There may have been a small win and a much smaller amount of cash I suppose... If Markle Sr. was receiving payments, they might well have been made in cash but not in one huge lump sum in advance. It won't have been cash. It's a little fantasy story, to herlp create a fairytale. And it would have been enough to get the job done. Hence him not having money now. Doesn't she have a half sister called Samantha? The fact that the State Lottery has pitched in, says a lot in my opinion. Very teeling, indeed.
|
|
Avacyn
Project Manager
Posts: 11,234
|
Post by Avacyn on Dec 14, 2017 0:29:52 GMT
She looks sexualised in this picture. And she's wearing blue!
|
|
Avacyn
Project Manager
Posts: 11,234
|
Post by Avacyn on Dec 14, 2017 23:21:50 GMT
Newborn Princess Charlotte: doll or baby?
When Princess Charlotte was first introduced to the public, which was when the Cambridges were leaving the hospital in May 2015, some commenters said that she looked like – or even was - a doll. Many new babies could be mistaken for dolls when they are asleep – I have seen this for myself – but her position and the casual way she is being held here do seem rather odd: We have some Masonic colours here too. There used to be videos on youtube where a siren went off whilst Kate was holding her. Charlotte didn't move. The commentator says "This little doll"!? referring to Charlotte. At that point I was 100% convinced that she was a real doll. Unsurprisingly the two videos showing this have been removed. In any event the remaining videos have a small crowd of sugars hooping and hollering and the baby does not respond. If babies slept that heavily why do parents make an effort to be quite when they put their kids down? Either it's a doll or they drugged their baby, which ever one is true, it's not on. Are you guys going to do photo analysis of the Markle pictures that are being dumped all over the DM? The insight you shared on the Middleton of yesteryear photos was very interesting. We really need to have a thread on Kate's "pregnancies" on this forum. I'll have to remember to start one.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Dec 15, 2017 6:30:03 GMT
"We really need to have a thread on Kate's "pregnancies" on this forum. I'll have to remember to start one."
What is wrong with this thread and the Royal Facade one! This time she may not go into hospital so there will be no doll pictures when she comes out.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Dec 16, 2017 6:05:07 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Lavendel on Dec 16, 2017 9:02:08 GMT
I have read the article and I have the feeling that there serious rivalry camps in the firm and he didn't want to take sides, or he didn't have anyone who understood his post traumatic stress after Afghanistan. More so Charles is busy, William was hold up with trans- Kate and their surrogate kids. so he wanted out. The Yorks tried to help by finding him a girlfriend among their friends and went skiing with him.
I think in the firm the Queen is the glue which holds them together and nobody wants to upset an old great grand mother so they wait.
All the families have issues, divorce, money worries, inheritance and if they can maintain their position after the Queen goes.
But now he has got a famous wife who over shadows all others and in away Meghan deflects attention away from the infighting in the family.
I think once the Queen has married off Harry and the crown is secured by an heir and many spares, she may pull back.
Thats why I think they are keeping theresa may or bojo as they are royalists and labour would cut all the funding.
Inside me I have a feeling Harry is marring Meghan as away to find a life away from royal firm and get a soft landing incase the Queen passes, the funding of the firm is reduced and they are told to fend for themselves.
William may live from family inheritance as heir. But Kate is no serious bread winner. So when hard goes to hard he becomes a pilot in emergency services.
But Harry will be a charity worker and with Meg they make speeches at United Nations about poverty and live from charity like Obama, Clinton families and his wife can still get some acting roles for charity, meet at davos with European royals.
________________
I think once the Queen passes there will be more leakes and selling of stories to tabloids of each other to make a quick pocket money.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Dec 16, 2017 17:37:05 GMT
Meghan’s early career path: something is odd here
From the DM, as usual: “She was offered three scholarships, but turned them all down to study theatre (combined with international relations) at Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois, where the drama department was renowned for nurturing talent… After graduating from university, eager to broaden her horizons and to learn Spanish, Meghan spent several months as an intern at the U.S. embassy in Buenos Aires. Already a committed feminist, with a strong social conscience, at that point she was unsure whether or not she wanted a career in the shallow, chauvinistic Hollywood entertainment industry. If anything, she was thinking then that she might become a producer. A brief trip home to Los Angeles changed all that. Meghan attended a party where she fell under the admiring gaze of an acting agency manager. The next day, he watched a student film she had made.‘ Stick me with me — you’re going to make money,’ he told her.” Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4783306/Meghan-unmasked-Unseen-photos-Harry-s-girlfriend.html#ixzz51RXFTs6S Those scholarships presumably mean that she would not have paid anything for her lessons. I wonder what was so special about Northwestern Uni. International Relations? What was she planning? And meeting a man who encouraged her to become an actress, despite her doubts, by mentioning money? We can't take all this at face value.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Dec 17, 2017 17:36:31 GMT
The Duchess of Kent
Katharine Worsley, Duchess of Kent, has been mentioned elsewhere in connection with Amner Hall, Catholicism and Princess Diana’s mother. I have always seen her as a decent human being and a fragile person who was destroyed by joining the royal family. The loss of two babies together with ill-health, chronic tiredness and depression explains much of her suffering, but I think there is more to it. This description of her at the Queen Mother’s funeral in 2002 shows that something was obviously very wrong: “The fringe British Royals formed another contingent: the Duke of Kent bulbous and red in the face in military uniform and clutching a baton, the Duchess looking deranged, very pale and moving as though under sedation. Princess Michael had her hair all over the place, the Prince bluff and browbeaten. Princess Alexandra was wraith-like, as though a puff of wind would flatten her.” Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3839947/Princess-Margaret-Arrogant-capricious-Edward-Dull-Charles-Turning-cyclops-majestically-mischievous-diaries-SIR-ROY-STRONG-takes-rapier-royal-encounters.html#ixzz51PGAwbrb At the funeral:
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Dec 18, 2017 17:39:30 GMT
The image for the Cambridge’s Christmas card for 2017
The picture below was released today. Is this another insult to our intelligence? They said they would release their own pictures, which means hours of fun with the photo-shopping! I am not much good at analysing pictures, but Kate’s face looks a little odd to me, as does George’s right hand. Where is Kate’s right arm? Is Charlotte too small? Surely these are old pictures: some of the clothes look like ones I have seen in pictures taken in the summer. They all look like cardboard cutouts to me! And where is the Christmas theme? This is what Kensington Palace Twitter had to say: “The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge are pleased to share a new photograph of their family. The image features on Their Royal Highnesses' Christmas card this year.“ Here is the ‘Christmas Card’:
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Dec 22, 2017 17:05:34 GMT
Two people who look different from usual
There was a big gathering for a Christmas lunch at Buckingham Palace two days ago. The DM took a lot of photographs, and got some good close-ups. These pictures look as though they are of look-alikes or imposters to me: I suppose that Meghan could have had some kind of makeover. Is this really Charlotte? Her eyes are much wider than normal and her mouth is not the same. Here is a typical picture: Her eyes are narrower in some of the DM pics, but she still looks like a different child. www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-5198241/Royals-gather-Buckingham-Palace-Christmas-lunch.html
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Dec 23, 2017 7:43:09 GMT
Princess Charlotte again
This one is from The Sun. She usually looks happy, but not here:
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Feb 9, 2018 17:20:27 GMT
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Feb 9, 2018 17:22:28 GMT
The checked shirt picture: shopped or not?
I am not sure about this one.
The picture originated with the Callen family. It first appeared in the DM article then was reproduced on various other sites. The caption says it was taken at Christmas 1991 - when Kate would have been almost 10. I agree that she looks older than that here. Maybe the DM was offering money for stories and supporting pictures, so they knocked this one up from a couple of sources.
I was hoping that this was a cropped version and that I would find one that shows more of the room & settee, but no luck.
Is it intended to look as though Kate is sitting on the arm of the settee? If you look at the back of the settee it looks like a two-seater, so could Dorothy be sitting on a stool and Kate standing behind her? Does Kate look a little large compared to the others?
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Feb 15, 2018 7:45:25 GMT
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Feb 15, 2018 7:58:59 GMT
Kate’s fringe - significant or not?
I noticed that she has a thick, straight-cut fringe in the bridesmaid pictures from 1993, when she would have been 11: The following picture is dated 1993 by the DM: So where did the fringe go/come from? If you look at her other pictures in sequence, she mostly has her hair swept back although she does sometimes have some shorter locks dangling on her forehead. The only other pictures I could find where she has a proper fringe are from several years earlier.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Feb 15, 2018 20:29:27 GMT
The strange bumps on Kate Middleton’s elbows
They generated many posts and much speculation on the old CC forum. Here is one of the pictures we found:
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Feb 15, 2018 20:30:29 GMT
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Feb 17, 2018 7:23:04 GMT
Kate and James at Uncle Gary’s first wedding
This was in 1993, when Kate was 11 years old and James 6. Here are all the Middletons: There is another picture of James that reminds me of Kate at the age of 7:
|
|