UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Feb 19, 2018 20:36:05 GMT
Botched photoshopping?
The lower part of Kate’s face in this picture from September 2016 looks very odd:
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Mar 6, 2018 19:44:30 GMT
Portraits again
The official story was that although many members of the public did not like Kate’s portrait by Paul Emsley, which was posted above, she was pleased with it. Sam Shaker, who painted pictures of William & Kate, tells a different story: “When I heard about Prince William and the Duchess of Cambridge’s engagement, I decided to paint a portrait of them to celebrate the happy occasion. I painted several but my favourite one was sent to them as an engagement present however they never saw the portrait as the secretaries at Buckingham Palace said they have no time to view my portrait, and Royal Protocol prevents them from receiving any gifts so they sent me a beautiful letter that features in my book that basically says thanks for your gift but no thanks! I received my portrait back and I wanted to display it so it is on the wall in Jazz After Dark’s bar. I also wanted to feature Diana’s engagement ring in the portrait as I thought it was an important part of their engagement and was such a beautiful piece of jewellery that it deserves to be included. However, the Duchess since paid thousands to have her portrait commissioned by Paul Emsley but when it was displayed at the National Portrait Gallery, she left with a face of disappointment, apparently feeling she had been given too many wrinkles and had a nose like Ian Botham. I think it was unfair on Catherine and myself, as if she had only seen my portrait, she would have seen how complimentary it was, showing her as the beautiful, smiling young woman that she is.” regalmediaadvertising.wordpress.com/2015/06/01/sam-shaker-interview/Maybe Kate felt that she had to pretend to be happy with her commissioned portrait. His depictions of Kate are certainly much more flattering than Paul Emsley’s. How mean-spirited of the palace to send the one with the ring back. I couldn't make them any larger:
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Mar 28, 2018 6:26:21 GMT
Is this really a picture of Kate?
This is a strange picture: The tartan skirts are the uniform of Marlborough College, which Kate attended between April 1996 and July 2000. The other girl is Jessica Hay, who shared a dormitory with Kate at Marlborough. At first it seems that they are standing in front of some lockers, but their hands are in a strange position and they look as though they are resting. This was long before Kate lost a lot of weight, yet her waist is very small and her whole torso looks very thin. Her face looks a bit off too. The colours of the two skirts are different. Were the two people photographed at different times? Jessica Hay sold her story in 2011. We do not know that she provided this picture, but it seems likely. It is possible that she cobbled something together just to prove that she was a friend of Kate’s. One other thing: this looks like a reversed hanged man pose, similar to the one Peaches Geldof was found dead in.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Apr 9, 2018 18:08:35 GMT
That lottery win again
Thomas Markle Jr. is the source of the lottery win story. His sister Samantha says that he invented the story: "In tweets, Samantha Markle disputed the lottery story and called her brother “a compulsive liar” and said he has mental-health issues and a drinking problem. Tom Junior is mentally ill. Don't you think if my dad won the lottery would be on public record. The Daily Mail believes any lie my brother feeds them.” Now Thomas Markle Jr. has come up with a new twist: “After winning $750,000 (£530,000) in the California State Lottery (using Meghan’s birth date to select his numbers), he decided to keep the windfall secret because he was still embroiled in a financial wrangle with Doria over the divorce. To avoid registering his name with the authorities, he sent a friend to Chicago to collect his prize-money. According to Thomas Jnr, the plan backfired when this surrogate swindled his father out of the money, which was invested in a failed jewellery business.” Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5568033/The-day-Meghan-Markle-let-ruthless-show.html#ixzz5CAiBzlTZ So what about the piles of cash? Or did Markle Sr. get cheated out of his money after showing it off? This is turning into a tangled web of contradictory lies.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Apr 10, 2018 7:02:31 GMT
Which picture shows the real Charles and Camilla?
There is often a big difference between posed pictures and those taken when they are out and about. Here is an example of what I mean:
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Apr 10, 2018 18:39:57 GMT
Charles and Camilla: looking good or photoshopped to hell?
A very impressive posed picture: Out and about in Australia: I feel sorry for Camilla, being dragged all over the world at an age when she might prefer to slow down and take things easy.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Apr 11, 2018 19:23:05 GMT
The London Eye visit in October 2016
I would like to have seen this, but I couldn’t find out what time they were supposed to arrive. I am not the sort of dedicated royal watcher who will wait for hours just for a glimpse. What are they wearing? His clothes look too tight for him, and that dress looks odd. They can afford the best clothes and the best stylists so why the weird looks? Almost all of the commenters criticised the dress. We can see that hard and bitter look again too: www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3830640/Kate-Middleton-William-Harry-mark-World-Mental-Health-Day-London.html
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on May 7, 2018 6:09:02 GMT
Four-fingered Harry
The DM has an article about how Harry has finally gown up. Just look at the fingers on the hands here. He looks a bit twisted too. Maybe transformer can see other strange things in this picture: “Even when he was going through the wildest periods of his younger life, nobody expected Prince Harry (pictured in Las Vegas) to marry an outspoken American divorcee three years his senior” Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-5697823/How-playboy-Prince-finally-grew-up.html#ixzz5Emzpmz5V For comparison, his fingers are long in this picture of him holding Henry the tuatara in New Zealand:
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on May 21, 2018 17:50:58 GMT
Official wedding picture
I remember this room with all the mirrors! Kate’s eyes are strange, especially if you expand the picture, and Princess Charlotte doesn’t look like herself. Maybe the photographer did a bit of tidying up:
|
|
|
Post by transformer on May 22, 2018 12:45:18 GMT
Here's more. The hidden hand from the wedding Hidden hand from the engagement
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on May 22, 2018 18:28:47 GMT
transformer these ‘dismemberment’ pictures are a big mystery. Why is there a missing hand in your picture of them on the steps? It looks very strange. Perhaps the photographers are careless and have low standards - or maybe they think we are too stupid to notice anything or care about inappropriate cropping. But if there are messages in these pictures, what are they telling us?
|
|
|
Post by transformer on May 23, 2018 5:55:37 GMT
It's the masonic hidden hand. The hidden hand that rules the world.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on May 28, 2018 6:28:32 GMT
You have been working very hard! I need time to look at all your posts. I agree that there is something strange going on with Prince George and Princess Charlotte.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on May 28, 2018 18:38:07 GMT
“The subject of replacements, clones and doppelgangers truly fascinates me.”
@questioneverything what about people who might robots or transhumans and men/women alleged to be women/men?
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on May 29, 2018 6:05:42 GMT
@questioneverything where pictures are concerned I just haven’t got the eye for detail that many other people have.
We have had a heatwave, but the weather is changing. More time indoors will give me a chance to catch up with some of this.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on May 29, 2018 6:11:07 GMT
@questioneverything you mentioned picture security.
There certainly is a danger of losing some pictures.
My approach is to link to them if they appear in many places, especially in the DM and similar. There is little danger that these ones will vanish. If they do not appear in many places or are on an obscure site, I save them on my laptop, post them on a test blog and link to them there.
Other people have accounts with sites such as PhotoBucket and Imgur where you can store pictures.
I linked to a very symbolic picture on MM’s Instagram then the whole thing vanished. Luckily I noticed this immediately, found it in the cache and saved it!
I also compose all posts in Word before putting them on here. This is very useful for reference and information security.
I should put something about this in the Technical section.
|
|
|
Post by Lavendel on Jun 9, 2018 17:54:13 GMT
Official wedding picture
I remember this room with all the mirrors! Kate’s eyes are strange, especially if you expand the picture, and Princess Charlotte doesn’t look like herself. Maybe the photographer did a bit of tidying up: This green room must represent something. Meg wedding dress and most of the dresses she wore before the wedding were green. During the wedding, carole, doria, the queen, kitty spencer, pippa wore shades if green. In harry potter the magic teacher wore green dress and had red hair.
|
|
|
Post by Lavendel on Jun 9, 2018 18:07:50 GMT
I wonder does the green mean she has magic or represents the magical red heads in harry potter? during the wedding, camila, oprah, serena, princess michael the choir wore shades of pink. Pink is a waterreddown version of masonic red.
Whenever camila wears pink, kate wears cream or white. During the wedding kate wore white. Camila red.
During the trooping of the colors today,
Camila, queen, kate, charllote, lady louise wore shades if blue.
However, meg, beatrice, savana wore shades of pink or soft red.
Today eugine had red hair and green dress. George wore white.
|
|
|
Post by Lavendel on Jun 9, 2018 18:12:50 GMT
I wonder what all these signifies. During the wedding Amal clooney wore yellow gold that means alot in the hieracy of the mansons.
So if the wedding was a masonic event, what does the different colours represent.
At the wedding, queen and charles wore lavender flowers colours on them which was a way to communucate royal support for the green - red hair magical wedding? lavender brown is meg now?
|
|
|
Post by Lavendel on Jun 9, 2018 18:14:37 GMT
What i noticed in the wedding picture, kate was made to have one all sering eye large than the other.the kids eyes are made larger than other.
Also interesting was harrys uniform, it was worn by prince george the fifth when he met his russian cousin. I really wonder what the black white and red shades mean.
When harry wears grey suit, meg wears pink dress.
During a garter event. Queen wore, white, camila wore whie but kate red. Kate
I wonder if there is a hidden ranking we dont know about. So when the queen weres blue, camila and kate wear blue.
I guess meg will wear pink or red untill her rank or rituals are made?
|
|
|
Post by Lavendel on Jun 9, 2018 18:26:48 GMT
Meg and harry went to ireland castel and canadian resort hidden in the mountains where the queen stays when in canada. I really wonder where they went there for more rituals of canadia order if the garter and into the irish castel they met members of the order for more ritauls which once diana talked about.
Looking at meg she looked pregnant today. Even at the wedding. I guess those were the magic rituals they had to perform for the unborn babies.
Her clothes have been not tight on the waist yet she is known to show her body.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Jun 9, 2018 18:44:24 GMT
I will have to come back to all this. There may well be some colour coding going on.
I did once read that for big public occasions the royal ladies consult with each other so that they wear different colours, with the Queen getting first choice. But this my have changed.
|
|
|
Post by Lavendel on Jun 9, 2018 19:29:55 GMT
I imagine the crown puts some guidelines and provides the colours and designs and the royal women are give three sets to choose from.
I noticed after meg married the crown step in to provide official clothes and rules. She has a hair dresser.
But before the wedding i guess she paid for the clothes herself and harry. Thats why her dress, hair and that of her mother were made unprofessionell. I think the crown funds or the duchy cornwally financed them for formal events.
Since the crown did not want a divorcee bride they only offered security but didnt do pr or stop the press or fund tickets for relatives. Thats why unlike williams wedding they could not afford to ferry relatives to england. The crown pr people didnt even try to provide security for markel father or stop the press.
However it seems, the crown now has moved in to stop the markels access to uk press.
The crown stopped the uk press from talking to markels who travelled to give interviews.
I wonder what reason did the crown give to stop uk press. I guess they are being paid to keep quite. I hear the got two year contract to write good things about kate in her first two years as royal. I noticed each time the years could end new dirty stories could come out.
I guess they got a deal to burry bad stories. I guess the madness before the wedding was to increase the power the media had in them and to demand more silence money. Blackmail.
|
|
|
Post by Lavendel on Jun 9, 2018 19:37:09 GMT
I will have to come back to all this. There may well be some colour coding going on. I did once read that for big public occasions the royal ladies consult with each other so that they wear different colours, with the Queen getting first choice. But this my have changed. It could be true. If the queen wears blue all important royal ladies wear blue. But i think it rotates in these colours, blue, green, cream/ white and pink /red. When the queen wears white on very special occassions...only camila wears white and only when charles is present. I think today camila, kate and queen wearing blue of similar shades means they have equal position due to the role of their husbands as protectors if the crown?
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Jun 17, 2018 18:09:25 GMT
What an awful sight transformer said this on the old forum: “Kate (in a Christmas wrapping inspired dress of unique awfulness)” I think that this one could give the red & green dress a run for its money: One commenter says that it looks like a shower curtain, and another was reminded of a duvet cover! The hat looks awful too. The cost is £3,922 although it may have been discounted or even given to this high-profile person who is such a good advertisement for the dress! Did she use tax-payers’ money to pay for this? I have not got much fashion sense, nor have I got the eye for detail that many royal watchers have. All I have is the feeling that something is very wrong. It is similar to what we have said about Kate: how can people who can afford stylists and expensive clothes and tailoring look such a mess? Maybe Meghan is trying to look the way she thinks someone in her new position ought to look and is getting it wrong. Is there something symbolic in the wearing of clothes that are much too big for her? Could she be seeing herself as bigger i.e. more important than she really is? www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-5853123/Prince-Harry-Meghan-Markle-steal-Princess-Dianas-nieces-wedding.html
|
|
|
Post by Lavendel on Jun 17, 2018 20:24:28 GMT
Thats the fashion at the moment. On the website of the dress it hangs on a slender model. After the metoo campaign, women are dressing modestly and websites like Zara has slender women in over size dresses and clothes.
The trend was brough about by international travellers women who are being forced to religious modesty and the many islamic customers of high fashion want that.
I read metoo was used to bring in these restrictions snd impose modesty on women. Now Hollywood metoo women are in oversized trousers, sweaters etc
|
|
|
Post by Lavendel on Jun 17, 2018 20:31:50 GMT
Thats the fashion at the moment. On the website of the dress it hangs on a slender model. After the metoo campaign, women are dressing modestly and websites like Zara has slender women in over size dresses and clothes. The trend was brough about by international travellers women who are being forced to religious modesty and the many islamic customers of high fashion want that. I read metoo was used to bring in these restrictions snd impose modesty on women. Now Hollywood metoo women are in oversized trousers, sweaters etc It could explain the wedding dress modesty. So she is on the modesty agenda
|
|
|
Post by transformer on Jun 25, 2018 11:00:23 GMT
It is curious isn't it that at a time of the covering up of Pakistani rape gangs in the UK with D notices over past few years, the sweeping under the carpet of muslims that drive cars accidentally onto the pavement and killing people(always blamed on losing control of car or alchohol)Mays frankly disgusting speech at the end of Ramadam that women are being asked to cover up. I predict we'll see some stars just by chance wearing muslim type gear covering their hair etc. Not that I am a fan of bearing too much flesh. In many parts of France now women have to dress very modestly and the same is true in muslim parts of London. Changing the subject, here is PW with the fake family photo of the Middletons which show blonde girls that in now way look like either Kate or Pippa, the fathers head has been pasted on as the light is too dark on his face given the sun drenched setting. Done to create the 'girl' narrative for Kate.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Jun 25, 2018 17:20:31 GMT
Another staged picture? transformer I remember that we analysed this picture a while back and found some oddities. I wonder what is behind this staged confrontation with the past.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,064
|
Post by UnseenI on Jul 10, 2018 6:18:39 GMT
|
|