UnseenI
Eternal Member 
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,058 
|
Post by UnseenI on Oct 4, 2017 6:53:49 GMT
Behind the scenes pictures of W & K and their staff in Berlin
Do these pictures look odd to anyone? Something about the relative sizes of the people and the doors seems very wrong. Nice Masonic floor!  
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,058
|
Post by UnseenI on Oct 4, 2017 7:18:03 GMT
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,058
|
Post by UnseenI on Oct 5, 2017 17:30:33 GMT
Prince Harry’s neck
At the 2017 Invictus Games in Toronto. What on earth is that bulge? 
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,058
|
Post by UnseenI on Oct 7, 2017 9:14:28 GMT
Big William, little Harry and tiny Princess Anne
Watching the fly-past from the balcony at Buckingham Palace at this year’s Trooping of the Colour. The relative heights of the two princes are all wrong here:  Princess Anne is peering over Prince Philip’s shoulder: how she’s shrunk!  www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4613854/Charlotte-George-Kate-royal-balcony-Queen-s-birthday.htmlThis is ridiculous. It must be difficult to get good pictures where they are all looking in the right direction, hence the cut and pasting of images, but why does the DM make it so obvious? Some people see the photo-shopped pictures as coded, subtle messages. Are we to understand that Prince William is now the main candidate for next monarch, with diminishing chances for the small people? In another image in the article, Prince Harry is completely out of the picture.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,058
|
Post by UnseenI on Oct 9, 2017 5:23:28 GMT
Princess Charlotte's eyes: a noticeable feature
As we can see from the majority of pictures, Princess Charlotte has narrow eyes. In some cases this could be because the sunlight bothers her, but many were taken indoors:   Not all pictures show her like this though. The big, round symbol on the cushion is of interest – and so are Charlotte’s big, round eyes:  How strange. Children do change with age, but she had quite narrow eyes when very young: 
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,058
|
Post by UnseenI on Oct 9, 2017 5:28:32 GMT
Princess Charlotte's changing features again
Perhaps she gets her eyes from Carole Middleton:  Some kind person made a collage of some pictures:  Her mouth is different too... The picture in the pink woollen hat is dated March 2016, when she was 10 months old. They all went on a skiing holiday. A member of the old forum noticed some photo-shopping at the time. The bottom right picture is from May 2016, her first birthday. I am very confused. Something isn’t right, but what? Wide, narrow and in-between eyes, long mouth and rosebud mouth... photo-shopping or two (or four) babies? This DM article has a large number of pictures: www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3567947/Princess-Charlotte-new-pictures-released-mark-birthday.html
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,058
|
Post by UnseenI on Oct 9, 2017 17:08:40 GMT
Second birthday picture: the eyes don’t look right again
This is the official birthday portrait. We deserve better than this. The background seems badly chosen, and one of her hands was caught at a bad angle: 
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,058
|
Post by UnseenI on Oct 16, 2017 18:42:19 GMT
Prince George’s first day at school
He looks very unhappy in the pictures taken of him in the school playground. Many people commented on this, and Kensington Palace issued an Instagram of him smiling. Something about it looks a bit off to me. It could be their relative heights when George is on the ground and the steps, and his leaning sideways. He looks weightless. I am not very good with pictures but there is something a bit odd here. Daily Mail picture and the Instagram, for comparison:  http://instagram.com/p/BYvtTarABuP
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,058
|
Post by UnseenI on Oct 16, 2017 18:47:23 GMT
What is the DM suggesting?
“Happy at home, anxious at school: How George went from relaxed to a bag of nerves (and there was no hiding the bruise under his eye) Prince George looked smart with his blond hair neatly combed to the side for the start of term. But boys will be boys - even princes - and there was no hiding the start of a shiner and two small cuts under his right eye (inset).“  A rather unfortunate choice of words here: “Kate has already said she isn't sure her son 'has any idea what's going to hit him' when he starts 'big' school for the first time.” Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4860664/Prince-George-arrives-day-school.html#ixzz4s5IRE2PU
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,058
|
Post by UnseenI on Oct 19, 2017 16:29:17 GMT
Prince Charles and Prince George
The relationship seems rather distant. Could Prince Charles know or suspect something? Maybe he doesn’t like the brown eyes... Two birthdays missed: “…it is claimed Charles rarely saw his first grandchild George during his first year, even missing his first birthday to tour a Scottish red ¬squirrel sanctuary. Royal nanny Tiggy Legge-Bourke reportedly urged Charles to leave work early to “come for George’s bath time. Otherwise you won’t know your grandchild”. But Charles kept to his schedule — and even missed George’s second birthday too.” www.thesun.co.uk/news/3267064/from-foul-mouthed-rants-at-staff-to-tears-before-diana-wedding-and-very-specific-egg-demands-new-book-reveals-unseen-side-of-prince-charles/Missing two birthdays seems rather strange to me. Prince Charles and the first day at school: “Prince Charles has spoken about his grandson Prince George's first day of school, describing it as ‘character building’. The 68-year-old, seemingly unaware of the concept of primary school, said: ‘Poor old thing. He’s been left there to have to get on with it when the parents go away. That’s the problem. It’s good for you in the end, I suppose. It’s character building, I suppose.’ When asked by ITV News if he gave the four-year-old any advice ahead of his first day at 'big school' at Thomas' Battersea in London, he replied, unsurprisingly, ‘Of course not.’ ‘He wouldn't take it from me, I don’t think, at that age,’ he added. But Charles had more to say about George's experience at the tender age of four. ’At that age you don’t worry quite a lot about going to school as you do when you get a bit older. It’s that business of meeting new people and wondering, you know.’" www.independent.ie/style/celebrity/celebrity-news/prince-charles-had-an-interesting-take-on-prince-georges-first-day-of-school-poor-old-thing-36115585.htmlHow badly expressed and ungrammatical! Maybe the subject of Prince George makes him uncomfortable for some reason…
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,058
|
Post by UnseenI on Oct 27, 2017 5:56:40 GMT
Kate or James Middleton?
We spent ages analysing pictures of the young Kate and her family and circle on the CC forum. The experts detected some indications of photo-shopping. This may seem sinister to some people, but it could be that people just did it for the money: the DM offered to pay for photos, and people obliged. Maybe they inspected their scanty collections, and got to work to create a few more saleable pictures! As an example, here are some details of two photographs that are really confusing me. One is of James (Boomf) Middleton and the other is of Kate. James Middleton was born in April 1987. He attended to St. Andrews school, as did Kate. James is pictured at Uncle Gary Goldsmith’s second wedding, which took place in 1997, when he was in his 10th year. Kate was (allegedly) born in January 1982. Kate is shown in her class at school with apparently shopped hair in 1990, when she would have been eight years old. I have put them side by side for comparison. James Middleton is the boy at the front in the centre. Look at his face and fringe. Kate has long hair at the back that looks shopped on. Look at her face and fringe:   Could someone have used a picture of James at 10, from the wedding or even from the school, to make a picture of Kate at 8 - many years after the event? If it really is Kate in the picture, why add the hair? This is all very confusing.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,058
|
Post by UnseenI on Oct 27, 2017 18:17:34 GMT
Yet another strange picture
 “Kensington Palace has released a brand new family photo showing Prince William and Duchess Kate relaxing in the garden with their children Prince George and Princess Charlotte. The intimate black-and-white photo sees William and Kate laughing together as they recline on the grass underneath a tree, with the family's dog Lupo running past. The couple's two children can be seen next to their parents, Prince George with his back to the camera, while little Charlotte sits in the tall grass amongst some flowers.” www.hellomagazine.com/royalty/2017052939319/prince-william-kate-middleton-children-gq-magazine-photo/Where to begin with this one? Why is it black and white when they are sitting in a lawn or meadow? Lupo is a cocker spaniel; he looks more like a rabbit here, and surely he is too small. Kate seems to be stuck onto the picture. William’s neck looks odd. Why isn’t George facing front? This statement by William is ironic if you look at the wall with barbed wire on top: "I want George to grow up in a real, living environment, I don’t want him growing up behind palace walls, he has to be out there."
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,058
|
Post by UnseenI on Oct 28, 2017 5:32:52 GMT
The GQ shoot again
The bizarre, dark and sinister pictures are just so wrong, in many ways and on many levels. I can’t put much of it into words. Is it all just bad photo-shopping or are there many messages for us? The picture above makes me think of this:   Then there is this one:  William’s head and neck look all twisted and he is sitting very awkwardly. Why publish such dreadful pictures?
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,058
|
Post by UnseenI on Nov 1, 2017 19:33:43 GMT
Newborn Princess Charlotte: doll or baby?
When Princess Charlotte was first introduced to the public, which was when the Cambridges were leaving the hospital in May 2015, some commenters said that she looked like – or even was - a doll. Many new babies could be mistaken for dolls when they are asleep – I have seen this for myself – but her position and the casual way she is being held here do seem rather odd:   We have some Masonic colours here too.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,058
|
Post by UnseenI on Nov 1, 2017 20:15:20 GMT
Reborn doll or a baby princess?
Close-ups of Princess Charlotte on her first appearance. Shouldn’t her head be supported?  In the baby carrier: 
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,058
|
Post by UnseenI on Nov 2, 2017 17:24:05 GMT
Dolls that look like royal babies
Dolls are being designed to resemble George and Charlotte: "While there are several versions of the Prince George and Princess Charlotte dolls available on the internet, the bestsellers are by artist Ping Lau, considered the ‘queen’ of reborn dolls, whose work sells for between £350 and £3,500 depending on the finish."   "‘In the case of George or Charlotte, I work from every available photograph I can find,’ the artist said. ‘When I first moulded Prince George, I had no idea how popular he would become. Now he’s my bestseller. Charlotte is doing very well too. T he vinyl kits are shipped out with the head, body, arms and legs separate. Then fans create each individual child. It truly is an art form.’ Kym George, 55, from the US state of Wisconsin, has ‘brought to life’ hundreds of dolls, including a Prince George and a Princess Charlotte." Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3456392/Who-buy-creepy-doll-look-like-George-Charlotte-Bizarre-craze-anatomically-correct-reborn-babies-coming-here.html#ixzz40nDt9aK8 Dismembered dolls were featured in many threads on the old forum. The above extract from the article brings them to mind and ’bringing to life’ makes assembling them sound like some kind of sinister ritual.
|
|
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,058
|
Post by UnseenI on Nov 7, 2017 5:10:20 GMT
Prince George’s third birthday picture from July 2016
Something isn’t right here. Lupo’s back end seems much too small: he looks like a seahorse! Surely it can’t just be the way the dog is sitting:  Here he is in December 2013 for comparison: even though he is much younger he is quite heavily built behind.  When we first discussed this picture, another poster noticed a ‘spirit dog’ made out of light lying up against the base of the tree in a similar position to Lupo, and said that what at first glance could be Lupo’s haunch looks like the head of an eel. Why do so many of these pictures issued by Kensington Palace have something odd about them?
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,058
|
Post by UnseenI on Nov 7, 2017 17:07:47 GMT
Another strange picture from the third birthday session
Why on earth would this one with truncated limbs be published? It reminds me of the dismembered dolls that were featured in many threads on the old forum: 
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,058
|
Post by UnseenI on Nov 9, 2017 6:19:09 GMT
The Cambridge’s Christmas card for 2015
Taken in October but released in December. Something isn’t right – again.  Experts can probably see much more than I can, but even to me Princess Charlotte looks as if she could be peeled away like a sticker. The more the picture is expanded, the more her head looks balanced on her body with no signs of a neck. She is wearing the same clothes that she wore in a previous photo-shoot too. Princes George and William both have missing left feet, and Charlotte’s left shoe has dropped off. Some of it looks blurred too. There is a small coincidence involving the wooden red Victorian steam-train engine: Pigs and oranges are topics on interest; the hand-crafted toy was made by Orange Tree Toys, which are sold in Trotters, a favourite shop of Kate’s. www.people.com/people/package/article/0,,20395222_20974535,00.html
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,058
|
Post by UnseenI on Nov 9, 2017 18:37:09 GMT
The young Middletons in a publicity shot
This picture was published in January this year to mark the 30th anniversary of Party Pieces:  Kate is seven here, Pippa five and James two. Here is the picture of the two girls in Jordan three years earlier:  "Kate Middleton (left) aged four with her father and sister Pippa in Jerash, Jordan" Some members of the old forum were not convinced that these girls were Kate and Pippa. To me, 'Kate' in the lower picture looks like 'Pippa' above. Kate above does resemble the seven-year-old in some of her school pictures however. As for James above... does he look a bit like Pippa below? I am really confused. Has the top picture been composed by cut and pasting? It looks as though Pippa is standing on something. As they are demonstrating party items, I would expect them to be dressed up.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,058
|
Post by UnseenI on Nov 10, 2017 7:23:29 GMT
The portrait of Kate Middleton in the National Gallery
When I saw this picture in the National Portrait Gallery, people were saying that Paul Emsley had produced an unflattering picture and that he must be a bad artist:  Maybe making her look older and less attractive was deliberate and he was trying to tell us something. Very few people liked the picture and some were very critical indeed. I found this in WiKi: “Charlotte Higgins, of The Guardian, compared the depiction of Kate to a character in the Twilight franchise, saying, ‘The first thing that strikes you about Middleton's visage as it looms from the sepulchral gloom of her first official portrait is the dead eyes: a vampiric, malevolent glare beneath heavy lids. Then there's the mouth: a tightly pursed, mean little lip-clench (she is, presumably, sucking in her fangs). And God knows what is going on with the washed-out cheeks: she appears to be nurturing a gobbet of gum in her lower right cheek. The hair is dull and lifeless; the glimpse of earring simply lifts her to the status of Sloaney, rather than merely proletarian, undead.’” A vampire? The more I look at various images of the portrait, the more sinister she seems. We have learned not to take things at face value. So why was this particular artist chosen? Why was a picture that was generally disliked accepted by the Royal Family as an official portrait?
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,058
|
Post by UnseenI on Nov 16, 2017 18:12:53 GMT
Artificial smiles, a missing foot, a plastic hand and a wooden arm
This was supposed to be a shoot from their secret ski-ing holiday in the French Alps in March 2016. It looks a bit like a typical catalogue picture to me. Were their faces stuck on to other people’s bodies? Did they pose in a studio and shop the pictures into a snowy scene? And is that a pom-pom on George’s hat or a shopped snowball? An expert on the old forum said that you can see a lot more by greatly expanding this and the other pictures from the shoot. Their eyes and teeth will look very odd when blown up. And, once again, someone’s left foot is buried or cut off.  Why does this keep happening with this lot? This sounds sinister to me: “In recent years William and Kate have also made increasingly clear they wish to control access to information and images concerning their family. Traditional photocalls have been scrapped in favour of Kensington Palace releasing carefully chosen images, often taken by the Duchess herself. “ Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3480131/Royals-piste-Duke-Duchess-Cambridge-children-Prince-George-2-10-month-old-Princess-Charlotte-long-weekend-French-Alps-ski-holiday.html#ixzz4yc0ddcKo
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,058
|
Post by UnseenI on Nov 24, 2017 7:13:17 GMT
Prince George
More often than not, when he was younger he was shown as turning or pulling away from Kate when she was carrying him. Perhaps he was looking around for the Spanish nanny. Not much of a real bond to be seen here:  
|
|
|
|
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,058
|
Post by UnseenI on Nov 26, 2017 17:27:39 GMT
Duchess of Cambridge: signs that all is not well
Kate Middleton looks much older than her official age in many pictures. She often looks hard, unhealthy, unpleasant, bitter, haggard, miserable and hopeless too. Here is an example from July 2016 – it may have been a serious occasion, but something definitely isn’t right:  “Kate, 34, joined her husband Prince William and brother-in-law, Prince Harry, for the centenary commemorations for the Battle of the Somme at the Thiepval Memorial in Picardy, France.” Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3668692/Duchess-Cambridge-dons-2-900-Missoni-coat.html#ixzz4D8KhzuAO
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,058
|
Post by UnseenI on Nov 26, 2017 17:29:56 GMT
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,058
|
Post by UnseenI on Nov 27, 2017 15:15:24 GMT
Laughing like a lunatic: the other side of the depression coin
These pictures speak for themselves; something isn’t right:   I suspect that she can only operate in two extreme modes for much of the time: manic and depressed. Artificial laughter, fake enthusiasm, exaggerated expressions and over-acting are her attempts to hide and overcome the depression and misery and give people the message that she is very happy and interested in everything. This looks like protesting too much and trying too hard.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,058
|
Post by UnseenI on Nov 27, 2017 16:01:22 GMT
More exaggerated happiness
Maybe Kate goes over the top when she wants everyone to see how much she is enjoying the occasion, or when she suddenly realises that people are looking at her. Maybe she knows that her resting face is not good so reminds herself to smile:   She does sometimes look genuinely happy and she can smile naturally, but there are many more pictures similar to the ones posted here to be found online.
|
|
