I dont have evidence yet but i think the middletons are in bed with the sun, mirror and some dm journalist to make markle thomas not go away. I noticed that while all the other press has ignored the cambridges. Dm and mirror put a picture of kate laughing like a maniac.
The journalists from sun: james bean ; mirror christoph buckin and dm piers morgan have all tracked down markle thomas and made direct interview and every Sunday or Monday morning they bring out a damning thomas markle interviewer to counter royal events.
All these journalists never followed up the middletons. I wonder what game they are up to.
First it was mirror which bought markle tea and champagne. Today its the sun which sent james and before day of the garter its was piers from dm.
——————————————-
The usa beast newspapers is going after them
With an article about them stirring classism and hate against markle.
—-/———————/
But from todays press am sure the middletons are in the mix.
Tom sykes of daily beast of usa is fighting back
media.gettyimages.com/photos/prince-william-duke-of-cambridge-sits-next-to-british-prime-minister-picture-id999415860“Of course, the papers can’t openly say this (out and out snobbism is only slightly less unacceptable than out and out racism), so instead some have developed a poisonous but effective strategy of latching on to very minor alleged breaches of protocol and using these to attempt to shame and embarrass Meghan, as well as bolster a negatively-charged perception of her as an outsider.
A recent example of this was an article by the Daily Mail which found fault with Meghan for the way she sits on a chair.
The Mail headlined its report on what they called the ‘Sussex Sit’ with an all-caps allegation that Meghan had committed ‘ANOTHER royal faux pas’ after she was photographed crossing her legs while seated next to the queen at a church service.” daily beast.
“The British newspaper the Daily Express – which has a traditional readership – has also latched onto Meghan’s protocol problems as a snarky way of attacking her; one recent story called her out for holding Harry’s hand in public.
Students of British social history might recall Nancy Mitford’s essay "The English Aristocracy," which famously listed the different words posh (U) and common (non-U) people used for the same objects (for example, it’s common, Mitford says, to refer to someone as ‘wealthy’, the upper classes would call them ‘rich’.)
Mitford's essay became part of Noblesse Oblige: An Enquiry Into the Identifiable Characteristics of the English Aristocracy (1956), a collection of four satirical essays, supposedly edited by her, plus a poetic meditation on class by John Betjeman.
Evelyn Waugh was one of the contributors. Another of the essays noted that the non-U were not able to simply learn U words and start using them because subtle mistakes – in pronunciation, emphasis or context – would give them away as imposters.
The book caused a sensation when it was published, and while reading it today, even making allowances for its satirical intent and tone, one can’t help rather hating the arrogance and entitlement of Nancy Mitford and her pals. Mitford might not have been above cocking a sneer at Meghan.
But, pace Mitford’s critics, much of what was alluded to in Noblesse Oblige was completely accurate.
The British were still utterly obsessed with class in 1956, and, although times have changed, the class shaming of Meghan shows they maybe haven’t changed as much as one might hope.
A belief in the validity of the fixity of the British class system still lingers deep in the British soul, so deep that it’s not till some Brits emigrate that they realize how influenced they have been by the legacy of classism.
You could make a sound argument that class divisions, and attempts to challenge them, are the invisible glue holding together much modern British entertainment. Without the British class system you wouldn’t have much to laugh at in Monty Python and you definitely wouldn’t have Gosford Park, Downton Abbey and perhaps even Harry Potter.
This deep programming is what Meghan, a woman whose family tree on one side ends in slavery, is up against.
The national muscle memory means that, through no particular fault of their own, the British are highly susceptible to class-fuelled attacks on individuals.
For the right-wing media, criticizing the way Meghan sits, holds hands or crosses her legs is a useful proxy for criticizing who she is – or rather, isn’t.”
On her hugely successful trip to Ireland this week with Harry, Meghan was criticised for allegedly ‘flouting protocol’ by expressing an opinion on the Irish abortion referendum after an Irish politician tweeted a message that Meghan had appeared to be ‘pleased’ at the result.
Yes, next time, she might choose to say nothing, but congratulating a pro-choice campaigner on a result endorsed by 67% of the population is about as minimally politically controversial as you can get.
And yes, members of the royal family are, theoretically, not supposed to express political opinions, but they often do. Prince Charles, who will be the next King, while Meghan will almost certainly never be queen, famously wrote letters to government ministers lobbying for government funding for his pet causes, such as homeopathy.
As the royal historian and historical consultant for Netflix series The Crown Robert Lacey told the Daily Beast earlier this week, “What Meghan said was in no way rabid or sensational and hardly surprising; she is a modern royal and we know that she has modern beliefs.”
Indeed. Meghan’s page on the royal family website declares ‘her lifelong commitment to causes such as social justice and women's empowerment’ and contains, in giant letters, a quote from a speech she gave in 2015, saying “I am proud to be a woman and a feminist.”
She certainly wasn’t "embroiled in a political storm" because of the reported comments as the Mail reported.
There is of course a broader point here, which is that if the British royal family is to be remotely engaged and relevant in the modern world, they clearly do need to be able to hold and, shock horror, espouse their views from time to time, particularly if, as Lacey points out, they are not "rabid."
Constitutional scholars argue that the behavior of the Monarchy should follow popular mores rather than bound ahead of them, and in this case, most likely through sheer intuition, Meghan has complied completely with that maxim.
So what did she really do wrong in Ireland?
Nothing. And why did the Mail seek to hammer her for it?
Because they are nervous about the constitutional settlement?
Or because she is black?
Because she is a human with opinions?
Or was it just because she is not PLU, darling?“
———————————-
“
King Henry VIII
———————
I think with William we have a second king henry and the powerful Bolyne family. Just like middletons there was a very ambitious sister, a second i fortunate younger sister and a brother whom bolyne was accused of incest to give the king a son. Kate has a brother and a sister who may be sarrogates or the mother is the surrogate.
I see a repear here but the middletons are not alone in this. I think they have a group backing them. I
kate at Wimbledon for official duty. So she has broken her maternity leave to appear today. She was given vip reception and put herself before meg as she has seniority as the patron. But Meg takes her time talking with children so the press got exclusive pictures like she waa there alone. 
laughing like a maniac to attract attention. As i predicted this are the pictures out there. Its like she high
i dont know who this lady is but she has gotten more top pictures 
in the same week Ludwig louis was baptized 
The cambridges are getting erratic by the day. Normally they hate giving pictures of their children to the press. Yet today they gave this picture to the press because they couldn’t withhold it as it is soo sweet . Thats hours after the first official baptism pictures were released to the press. However the press has buried the photos to publice trump and putin meeting.
This Picture was taken by Matt Holyoak; 
This picture was taken by Matt Porteous. 
the other happy George. But his hands and feet are hidden.
e cambridges are off to mystique to celebrate georges 5 birthday. I thought of the Son of Kennedy the Camelot and his wife. Caroline Kennedy like Carole middton was very dominiering and forced Kennedy to fly the whole family when the weather was not god. Kennedy Jr had a magazine called George. 
