UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,284
|
Post by UnseenI on Apr 13, 2019 6:35:00 GMT
Sherlock Holmes, a Turkish sultan and Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
Sherlock Holmes gets into everything; now he has turned up in Istanbul, a current place of interest. Ottoman Sultan Abdülhamid II,was devoted to Sherlock Holmes; he was the first person to get the stories translated into Turkish. Sir Arthur Conan Doyle visited Constantinople (Istanbul) in 1907 as part of a tour. The Sultan gave him a medal:
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,284
|
Post by UnseenI on Apr 13, 2019 18:43:40 GMT
Everyone comes to Berlin
Napoleon Bonaparte entered Berlin in triumph in October 1806 after defeating the 4th Coalition, which included the Prussians. He rode in through the Brandenburg Gate:
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,284
|
Post by UnseenI on Apr 14, 2019 7:23:04 GMT
Napoleon took a souvenir from Berlin
After his victory over the Prussians in 1806, Napoleon had the Quadriga from the Brandenburg Gate sent to Paris; it was restored in 1814 by General Blücher after Napoleon’s defeat. Cartoonists recorded the theft:
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,284
|
Post by UnseenI on Apr 15, 2019 7:35:53 GMT
Sultan Abdülhamid II and Sherlock Holmes
Sherlock Holmes is alive and well in Turkey. The story of the Sultan and Sir Arthur Conan Doyle inspired Turkish novelist Yervant Odyan to write a book called Abdülhamid and Sherlock Holmes. It was first published in 2014. It must be popular: there are several different editions, but none in English as yet.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,284
|
Post by UnseenI on Apr 18, 2019 18:21:02 GMT
Caput Mundi
The Romans said, “Roma Caput Mundi” because they saw Rome as the head of the known world. Napoleon said, "If the Earth were a single state, Constantinople would be its capital." Now known as Istanbul, this is not the capital of Turkey, Ankara is. It seems a strange thing to say. Maybe it is the position between Europe and Asia that gave him the idea. At the height of the British Empire, London was seen as the most important city in the world - at least by the British. The man with the moustache had big plans to make Berlin the Caput Mundi. That came to nothing; the city was devastated by allied bombing. Lavendel said that Berlin is the new political capital and a Mecca for creative people. Perhaps people are working behind the scenes to make Berlin the new Caput Mundi.
|
|
|
Post by truthseeker on May 6, 2019 20:23:31 GMT
I was looking at some portraits of Queen Elizabeth I and noticed that she seemed to have unusual but beautiful eyes:
On another day I saw a portrait of Edward Seymour the Duke of Summerset and brother of Jane Seymour and I noticed that he had very similar if not the same eyes:
There is another portrait of him there he doesn't has these unique eyes but he still looks like Elizabeth the First:
That got me thinking: Could he be Elizabeth's I biological father or is this too far fetched? He was around 33 years older than Elizabeth I.
When Elizabeth's younger brother was baptised Edward Seymour was officially Elizabeth's step-uncle but is that really explanation enough for the fact that he carried her on that day:
I hope this post isn't too dishevelled but after I found this I just had to share it.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,284
|
Post by UnseenI on May 7, 2019 6:32:18 GMT
Interesting. I will look into this when I can use my normal laptop again.
|
|
|
Post by truthseeker on May 7, 2019 15:18:27 GMT
Sometimes I think that this theory is stupid and very unlikely to be true, other times I find it to be very likely. Maybe there is a part of me that wants it to be true because I have a penchant for such scandals/stories/dramas. To suspect something like this might also be unfair to those people involved who can't defend themselves anymore.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,284
|
Post by UnseenI on May 7, 2019 17:47:06 GMT
All I can think of at the moment is that portrait painters flattered their subjects. Many used the same style too, so people looked alike even when they were not related. Elizabethan portraits look different in style from those done during the reign of King Charles II, which look different from those done during the next century.
Part of Queen Elizabeth's popularity came from a resemblance to Henry VIII, in personality and manner in addition to the red hair.
However, intuition often comes up with many good theories.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,284
|
Post by UnseenI on May 16, 2019 6:44:03 GMT
truthseeker I can’t spend too much time on this one but I have remembered that Henry VIII was not too fond of his daughter Elizabeth so probably would not have cared much if she died. She was not a boy; she was a constant reminder of her executed mother, Anne Boleyn. He might even have been secretly glad to see her out of the way. So I don’t think that even if she had died as a girl people would be afraid to tell him. I learned a little about her from history lessons at school. Political reasons such as the balance of power in Europe may have been the main reason for her not marrying
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,284
|
Post by UnseenI on May 17, 2019 17:34:51 GMT
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,284
|
Post by UnseenI on May 18, 2019 18:44:46 GMT
Princess Margaret, Peter Pan and J. M. Barrie
Just as Princess Diana did, Princess Margaret lived in Kensington Palace for many years with her family. In May 1997, she unveiled a plaque to commemorate the 85th anniversary of the installation of the statue of Peter Pan in Kensington Gardens. Princess Margaret was friends with J.M. Barrie when she was a child. She first met him at her third birthday party; he was 73 at the time. Princess Margaret at the ceremony, with ‘Peter Pan’ and ‘Wendy’:
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,284
|
Post by UnseenI on May 19, 2019 8:02:56 GMT
J. M. Barrie and the royal family
Sir James Matthew Barrie had some connections with the royal family, both professional and personal. He was made a baronet by George V in 1913 and awarded the Order of Merit in 1922. When he died in 1937, George VI called him an old friend and said that he brought joy to old and young alike. The Queen Mother, then Queen, is said to have preferred his plays to Shakespeare’s. Not only did J.M. Barrie have Sussex connections, his Kensington home was not the only place where he lived close to a royal residence. Barrie was born and buried in Kirriemuir in Scotland. By coincidence, Glamis Castle, ancestral home of the Queen Mother and Princess Margaret’s birthplace, is close by. Barrie first met the two little princesses Elizabeth and Margaret when they were all on summer holiday there in 1933. He was invited to Princess Margaret’s third birthday party and they became friends. He told stories to and played games with the two little girls. Barrie made a big impression on Princess Margaret. He was later told that when his name had been mentioned, Margaret had responded immediately, “I know that man. He is my greatest friend, and I am his greatest friend.” He visited the girls at their London home too. Princess Margaret in 1932 and J. M. Barrie (right) with Prime Minister Ramsay MacDonald in 1933:
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,284
|
Post by UnseenI on May 20, 2019 6:51:45 GMT
Elizabeth I and Edward Seymour
“Sometimes I think that this theory is stupid and very unlikely to be true, other times I find it to be very likely. Maybe there is a part of me that wants it to be true because I have a penchant for such scandals/stories/dramas.” truthseeker maybe you sense that there is always a lot going on behind royal façades and that all is not what it seems. You are not alone; people love mysteries. As you know, many people are still very interested in Richard III and the two princes in the Tower. It is almost impossible in many cases to decide which rumours, stories and allegations are true and which are just fiction. One thing I have noticed is that the same theories or allegations are often applied to different people, Meghan Markle, Wallis Simpson the Duchess of Windsor and Queen Elizabeth I for example. A problem is that some of them invalidate others. For example, if they were really a man or trans, how could they have had a secret child? There are many bizarre stories about Elizabeth I. She had many enemies who had a vested interest in discrediting her.
|
|
|
Post by magpiejack on May 20, 2019 13:47:40 GMT
You're spot on there, Elizabeth I did have a lot of enemies, mainly Catholics. Where do you start with the rumours? She was the illegitimate child of Anne Boleyn's lute player... she had an illegitimate child by Edward Seymour... an illegitimate child by Robert Dudley... she was really a man. I got a free download a few years ago of 'The Secret of the Virgin Queen', written by Mark Garber, a former detective, about the rumours that the real Elizabeth died and was replaced by the Bisley Boy. He comes to the conclusion that it wasn't true. It doesn't seem to be on Amazon anymore, but might be on another indie publisher such as Lulu. Two suggested illegitimate children of Elizabeth I were Dorothy Latimer and Francis Bacon. I guess we'll never find out the truth.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,284
|
Post by UnseenI on May 20, 2019 19:04:34 GMT
Queen Elizabeth I
I don’t believe that she was a man, any more than Margaret Thatcher was! She was her father’s daughter and a lion-hearted woman. Living in fear of her life as a girl and young woman was enough to toughen her up. Even the DM had the story that she had a secret child! Someone claimed to be the son of Queen Elizabeth and Robert Dudley: “Courtiers moved swiftly to dismiss it as fantasy, part of a plot by the Roman Catholic interrogator - Sir Francis Englefield, an English exile in Spain - who recorded the statement, to overthrow Elizabeth I... In the first week of her reign, the unmarried Elizabeth, aged just 25, sought to allay the fears of her subjects by promising them her devotion, insisting there would be no marriage or children to distract her from duty. Holding her coronation ring aloft, she declared: ‘Behold the pledge of this, my wedlock and marriage with my kingdom. And do not upbraid me with miserable lack of children: for every one of you, and as many as are Englishmen, are children and kinsmen to me.’" www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-390593/Did-Virgin-Queen-secret-love-child.html
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,284
|
Post by UnseenI on May 20, 2019 19:07:32 GMT
"I guess we'll never find out the truth."
This applies to just about all the outstanding historical conspiracy theories!
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,284
|
Post by UnseenI on May 20, 2019 19:14:13 GMT
I see that Mark Garber has investigated the Princes in the Tower case and written a book about that too.
|
|
|
Post by magpiejack on May 21, 2019 14:52:15 GMT
I see that Mark Garber has investigated the Princes in the Tower case and written a book about that too. Yes, another interesting topic! I went to Leicester Cathedral last year, the Welcomers as they are called are very interesting to talk to and they know reams about Richard III. They put me on to some reading on the topic, I would need to look up the precise details (I'm away for the week at the mo) but essentially there was an Act of Parliament of which Henry VII ordered all copies to be destroyed on his accession. One copy was overlooked and remained however, and if I remember correctly it stated that Richard III was the rightful heir to the throne. It is alleged that this was because Edward IV had already been married before he married Elizabeth Woodville and his first wife was still alive at the time of his second marriage; therefore the marriage was bigamous and the two princes illegitimate, see John Ashdown-Hill's book "Eleanor: the Secret Queen" for details. If this was true, on Edward IV's death the next in line in the accession was Richard III. It is said that this is the reason that the Tudors were cruel, ruthless and paranoid, which they certainly were and they managed to extinguish the Planagenet line.
|
|
|
Post by magpiejack on May 21, 2019 15:04:40 GMT
Going back to Elizabeth I, one reason that I have read that she must have been a man is that she was very erudite and women back then weren't - that's nonsense. It is recorded that Henry VIII had the best tutors for his children and Elizabeth was a particularly brilliant scholar, fluent in French, Italian, Latin and Greek. You only need to look around for other well-educated women of her time and you do find some, off the top of my head Lady Jane Grey and Katherine Parr were intelligent and well-educated.
Elizabeth never married, but she did entertain marriage proposals (or at least appeared to) and she manipulated these politically to play one nation against another (see Alison Weir's work on this). She could well have equated marriage with death, given what happened to her mother.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,284
|
Post by UnseenI on May 21, 2019 18:31:08 GMT
“Going back to Elizabeth I, one reason that I have read that she must have been a man is that she was very erudite and women back then weren't - that's nonsense. “ magpiejack I completely agree. My mind too went immediately to the unfortunate Lady Jane Grey; I remember reading that she was very learned. It is rather like the ‘No True Scotsman’ fallacy: women have not got the intellectual capacity to learn Latin and Greek, so anyone who can learn them can’t be a real woman! As for marriage, there were not many suitable candidates on her level and many of them were Catholics. If she married, died and was survived by her husband, England might fall under the control of France or Spain. She did play games and keep some suitors dangling, stringing them along for fear of upsetting the balance of power. Wasn’t there a Frenchman half her age she called “My little frog”? In addition to not wanting to give a man political power over her, I agree that seeing what had happened to her mother might well have made her decide that she was best off single. She enjoyed her independence and being the Queen Bee too. What interests me most about Elizabeth I is her relationship with the astrologer, alchemist and occultist Dr. John Dee, whose signature was 007.
|
|
|
Post by magpiejack on May 21, 2019 19:04:14 GMT
Yes that's right - the 'little frog' was the Duke of Anjou. She did also consider Protestant suitors from various Scandinavian countries, which put the wind up the Catholic countries as a potential marriage would have produced a strong Protestant alliance. Then, once the Catholic countries were less belligerent and more malleable, she would dismiss the Protestant suitor!
I agree about John Dee - I do wonder what he may have managed to summon up and what was unleashed on the world... England did become very strong and prosperous from that point on.
The prejudices against women and scholarship lingered a long time - I remember reading that a late 19th century reason was given against women reading degrees at university was that studying mathematics would make them faint.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,284
|
Post by UnseenI on May 22, 2019 7:24:03 GMT
Richard III again magpiejack when you mentioned Archie Rice, it reminded me that although The Entertainer is not my sort of film, Laurence Olivier’s Richard III has always been one of my all-time favourites. There is a lot about the real Richard III and the film on here. We covered his reinterment in Leicester Cathedral. I remember that in the film Richard started a rumour that his older brother Edward was illegitimate. Richard wanted the throne and would say and do anything to get it.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,284
|
Post by UnseenI on May 22, 2019 7:25:39 GMT
John Dee and his influence
“I do wonder what he may have managed to summon up and what was unleashed on the world... England did become very strong and prosperous from that point on.”
This is a new idea to me.
I did know that the witches of England are said to have influenced events on a few occasions, raising the storm that destroyed the Spanish Armada for example.
John Dee is said to be the first person to have used the term ‘British Empire’. He may well be partly responsible for the emergence of the Golden Age.
|
|
|
Post by magpiejack on May 22, 2019 20:01:52 GMT
John Dee and his influence
“I do wonder what he may have managed to summon up and what was unleashed on the world... England did become very strong and prosperous from that point on.” "This is a new idea to me." It is said that if the devil grants you a wish, there is always a price to pay. I think it is clear that Dee was obsessed with riches in his quest to turn lead into gold. I didn't know about the witches and the Armada! That storm was fortuitous... just like the break in the storm that allowed the D-Day flotilla to cross the Channel. I have heard about Gerald Gardner's witches' alleged and anecdotal involvement in aiding the Allied cause, though I'm rather sceptical about the well-off people such as Gardner and the Golden Dawn members who got the beginnings of the New Age movement off the ground.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,284
|
Post by UnseenI on May 23, 2019 7:15:05 GMT
“I didn't know about the witches and the Armada! ”
Witches are said to be able to raise storms.
I have vague memories of reading about English witches welcoming William the Conqueror as they thought that they would be better off under his regime. I can’t see that they would have wanted Philip of Spain as their master.
Maybe they try to legitimise themselves and gain credit by making some of these claims.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,284
|
Post by UnseenI on May 23, 2019 7:17:14 GMT
Archie Andrews and the royal family
Here is another example of an Archie. I don’t like ventriloquists and their dummies myself, but some people love them. One of the most famous dummies in the UK was the wooden ‘schoolboy’ Archie Andrews. He was the star of the radio show Educating Archie in the 1950s. The royal family were great fans. Archie hosted the staff Christmas party at Windsor Castle for 25 years. At the first of these shows in 1948, George VI removed Archie's head to examine how it worked. As it was put back on, Archie quipped, "Sir, I'm the only fellow you've ever beheaded in your reign." Archie with with some young admirers and his ‘handler’ Peter Brough:
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,284
|
Post by UnseenI on May 23, 2019 7:21:08 GMT
Where is Archie Andrews now?
He lives in Sussex with a man who bought him at auction for £34,000. He made a stage comeback with another ventriloquist in 2011. Perhaps there is another role on the horizon for him - Archie Harrison the schoolboy!
|
|
|
Post by magpiejack on May 23, 2019 19:42:33 GMT
Where is Archie Andrews now?
He lives in Sussex with a man who bought him at auction for £34,000. He made a stage comeback with another ventriloquist in 2011. Perhaps there is another role on the horizon for him - Archie Harrison the schoolboy! Creepy... reminds me of the film Magic with Anthony Hopkins! Watch that and you'll feel uneasy about watching a ventriloquist for ever after.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,284
|
Post by UnseenI on May 24, 2019 7:24:03 GMT
“Creepy... reminds me of the film Magic with Anthony Hopkins! Watch that and you'll feel uneasy about watching a ventriloquist for ever after.”
I will give this film a miss if it ever comes on TV! I have always felt uneasy when looking at ventriloquist’s dolls - and many puppets. The royal family love them though.
|
|