|
|
Post by truthseeker on Oct 21, 2021 8:38:17 GMT
Hi,
I don't know if any of you ever dived into the "Paul is Dead" conspiracy theory. For me this one was my gateway drug into "thuthseeking". Actually this conspiracy theory is a hard one: Inside the circle of those who try to find out the truth about Paul and if he was replaced and why are many people who after years can not find the answers they crave for. Yesterday (no pun intendet) I read a comment on a "Paul was Replaced" forum in which someone said that this case gets more confusing the more you research into it and I think they are right. I also feel like this conspiracy theory has a higher number of mentally unsound "seekers" than any other conspiracy theory.
A few years ago I personally came up with a conclusion about what happened to Paul and people around him but I can't prove it and I have to admit that I sometimes get confused nonetheless about ot all and I wonder if I am really right about my conclusion.
Today I read another interesting comment (by timmyb52) about the Beatles in a "Paul was replaced" forum. It was so good so I want to share it in here:
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member 
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,079 
|
Post by UnseenI on Oct 21, 2021 8:43:31 GMT
truthseeker!!! Welcome back. I have often wished that you would start posting again. I will look into this soon - there may be something saved from the old forum.
|
|
|
|
Post by truthseeker on Oct 21, 2021 8:52:00 GMT
But I have to warn you the PID conspiracy is a dangerous one that can suck you in and make you go insane but I wanted to mention this here because something did seam to happen with The Beatles between the end of 1966 and the beginning of 1967 and there was something weird about them.
Why did their music and style change so much? Why didn't they tour anymore? Why during the year 1967 did John appear so thin and even more miserable than before? Are the answers to the questions simple? Have they just been sick of their old style? Has John discovered drugs and started taking a lot of then? Have they freed themselves from the influence of Brian Epstein more and and more? (He killed himself in the summer of 1967 shortly after the Beatles' radical change.)
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,079
|
Post by UnseenI on Oct 22, 2021 7:45:58 GMT
Paul McCartney's artwork with sunflowers
There are a few old posts that seem worth putting on here, if only for some clues and interesting background information. From what I remember, it was Avacyn who had some ideas about this case. This picture was originally released in 1988; it was used in 2018 for a new album. He said: “My original inspiration was similar to a picture we were talking about the other day, with Egyptian symbols and shapes I got from looking at a reference book on Egypt. I was interested in the way they drew sunflowers, so two appear on the left and on the right. It was a nice shape, so I took that and then I also love the way they symbolize trees. I like the way they reduce a tree to just some very simple symbols.”  
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,079
|
Post by UnseenI on Oct 23, 2021 18:25:08 GMT
Paul McCartney and a red rose
This is from the old forum:  "To those not familiar with symbolism, this just looks like Paul clowning around. Actually, the rose symbolizes Rosicrucianism and Paul is "sub rosa" ("under the rose"). He has taken an oath of secrecy to a fraternal secret society. The rose was chosen because it symbolized Horus (satan), the god of silence in ancient Egypt. It also symbolizes covert operations. These are the real reasons why roses were chosen to symbolize royalty and Valentine's Day. Also a bit of a "Paul is Dead" clue, with a rose "growing" out of his mouth. FX=6/24=6/2+4=66, symbolizing the Law of Man, idol worship, and the Dark Arts in kabbalah." randalli-hinsonlife.blogspot.co.uk/2010/07/what-wrong-with-beatles-alot-occult.htmlThe blog quoted above has a lot more about the Beatles and occult symbolism.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,079
|
Post by UnseenI on Nov 14, 2021 19:05:29 GMT
“I don't know if any of you ever dived into the "Paul is Dead" conspiracy theory.“ truthseeker I was aware that it existed, but was never very interested in the Beatles. I am not very good at seeing differences in pictures and music either. I have always had the impression that so many people were discussing it that I would not be able to add anything to the contributions. The famous photograph of the Beatles crossing Abbey Road has been used as evidence that Paul McCartney died! I found a debunking article about this. I will just give a short extract, with the picture and a link: “One of the most enduring conspiracies is that the band are walking across the road as if they were a funeral procession. John Lennon, leading the way and dressed in white, is supposedly the clergyman, while a black-suited Ringo Starr is meant to be the undertaker. George Harrison, meanwhile, has ditched the suits in favour of workman-like overalls — he’s the alleged gravedigger. McCartney, apparently the dead man walking, is out of step with the others, leading with his right foot rather than his left.... A white Volkswagen Beetle can be seen parked up on the side of the street, with a number plate that reads “LMW 28IF”. The first part, so the story goes, stands for “Linda McCartney Weeps”. It would make sense, but the timeline doesn’t match. The pair hadn’t even met by the time of the alleged 1966 crash.” www.standard.co.uk/culture/music/beatles-abbey-road-crossing-hidden-messages-paul-is-dead-a4208031.html |
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,079
|
Post by UnseenI on Apr 3, 2022 18:03:24 GMT
The Beatles in 1967
From truthseeker: “...something did seem to happen with The Beatles between the end of 1966 and the beginning of 1967 and there was something weird about them. Why did their music and style change so much? Why didn't they tour anymore? Why during the year 1967 did John appear so thin and even more miserable than before?“ I have been able to post on only a few threads recently, but came here just to quickly mention the Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, who came into the Beatles' lives at this time. They went to one of his lectures in London in the summer of 1967 and met him afterwards. This was followed by a visit to his ashram in India in February 1968. In her book Call No Man Master, Joyce Collin-Smith suggests that the Maharishi Yogi was responsible for their agent Brian Epstein's suicide. She also sees a connection between John Lennon's assassination and his being the only Beatle to speak out publicly against the Maharishi. I have mentioned these allegations in several articles on my blog. All together in London in 1967: 
|
|
Avacyn
Project Manager 
Posts: 11,247
|
Post by Avacyn on Apr 17, 2022 22:06:18 GMT
Hi,
I don't know if any of you ever dived into the "Paul is Dead" conspiracy theory. For me this one was my gateway drug into "thuthseeking". Actually this conspiracy theory is a hard one: Inside the circle of those who try to find out the truth about Paul and if he was replaced and why are many people who after years can not find the answers they crave for. Yesterday (no pun intendet) I read a comment on a "Paul was Replaced" forum in which someone said that this case gets more confusing the more you research into it and I think they are right. I also feel like this conspiracy theory has a higher number of mentally unsound "seekers" than any other conspiracy theory.
A few years ago I personally came up with a conclusion about what happened to Paul and people around him but I can't prove it and I have to admit that I sometimes get confused nonetheless about ot all and I wonder if I am really right about my conclusion.
Today I read another interesting comment (by timmyb52) about the Beatles in a "Paul was replaced" forum. It was so good so I want to share it in here:
When did Jimmy Savile start to get to know them? Might be a possible angle to look at.   |
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,079
|
Post by UnseenI on Apr 22, 2022 7:23:19 GMT
Jimmy Saville and the Beatles
“When did Jimmy Savile start to get to know them? Might be a possible angle to look at.” We may never know the exact date, but your picture of them pretending to be asleep is from their appearance in Top of the Pops on New Year's Day 1964. Another picture from the same event: 
|
|
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,079
|
Post by UnseenI on May 4, 2022 18:49:35 GMT
Isaac Asimov, Paul McCartney and some impersonators
I posted this about Paul McCartney and impersonators on the David Icke Forum in 2013: “Back in 1974, Faul approached Isaac Asimov about making a movie about a band that was being impersonated by ET's. Ironically, the Faul was going to play one of the impersonators. Here is what wiki had to say about the movie that never happened: Paul (Faul) McCartney approached Isaac Asimov in December 1974 with a possible idea for a sci-fi related project. He had just finished Wings' Venus and Mars album. In December 1974, former Beatle Paul McCartney approached Asimov and asked him if he could write the screenplay for a science-fiction movie musical. McCartney had a vague idea for the plot and a small scrap of dialogue; he wished to make a film about a rock band whose members discover they are being impersonated by a group of extraterrestrials. The band and their impostors would likely be played by McCartney's group Wings, then at the height of their career. Intrigued by the idea, although he was not generally a fan of rock music, Asimov quickly produced a "treatment" or brief outline of the story. He adhered to McCartney's overall idea, producing a story he felt to be moving and dramatic. However, he did not make use of McCartney's brief scrap of dialogue, and probably as a consequence, McCartney rejected the story. The treatment now exists only in the Boston University archives.” en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Asimov plasticmacca.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/paul-is-dead-clue-isaac-asimovs-five.html
|
|
