Behind the royal façade: what are they hiding from us?

The problem I think is two fold: a reign that has gone on too long, an old lady in her 90s who has simply no idea how cut throat society has become: secondly a highly corrupt royal family (Mountbatten was a notorious pedophile, Prince Philip was into sex parties, Prince Charles was a close friend of Jimmy Sovile for 40 years, Prince Andrew and underage girls / Epstein and the pedophile island, William marries Kate who is transgender and then Diana had a child fathered by Mark Dyer - this last is highly suppressed in the media) So the family are wide open to blackmail and players that would like to control their wealth and power.

There is no way, simply no way in the world that Meghan Markle from a broken family of bankrupts, already twice married got to marry Prince Harry without powerful players having the dirt and threatening disclosure. These players would have funded her very expensive PR campaign, media stories at the right time, not to mention training her. Soho House is a discrete brothel and she worked there - she is an escort. The blinds on CDAN said she traded sexual favours with Harvey weinstein in exchange for cocaine for example.

Your theory about the chess game is interesting Avacyn. The Middleton family or at least Gary Goldsmith the pimp and drug pusher could they be controlled by the same group of players? A very interesting theory. I tended to think with the Middletons that they just wanted in, whereas with Meghan its a takeover. But the same group could be behind both of them. A really interesting theory.

No need to apologise transformer , quite the opposite: it was great to wake up to find a lot of action on this thread. Your posts will inspire more posts.

I need to cool down a bit before looking again at this topic.

In the meantime, speaking of chess it is a game where a pawn can be promoted to a queen. I wonder...

Then there are people who try to break free from their backers once they attain their goal...

The news coverage has been saturation I think the Russians called it propaganda. But was it? Or was it a vast ritual. I don't normally find these things intersting but this tarot card reading it very interesting on this subject. She says that the wedding was a heart ritual to capture the hearts of the people (because the monarchys power is waning)



Someone left this comment under the video above

Now look closely at the revealed number plate of Harry and Meghans car as they drive to their rehearsal last Thursday (17 5 18)

Harry and Meghan: what really happened?

transformer I could cry when I think of all your - and the other regulars’ - wonderful CC material that has disappeared. I saved everything of mine, but much of it is not relevant to this forum, is out of date or does not make sense without other people’s posts. I have re-posted some of my best material about the royals and other topics though.

From what I remember, you found many examples of photoshopping in pictures of Harry with Meghan. I think we decided that she was releasing some of them herself, in an attempt to prove that they were still in a relationship. We thought that he had cooled off and stopped seeing her but she was still using his name to get money and publicity. We thought that people who were predicting an engagement were very wrong.

Maybe we were right at the time, but something happened. She and her backers would not give up easily I think. There was a lot at stake for all of them. So then the engagement was announced.

Then we wondered whether the marriage would really take place or would something happen to prevent it. Who knows what happened behind the scenes. But it did go ahead.

To me, Harry is starting to look like James Matthews, as if he has been hunted down and captured.

I wonder what the next developments will be.

Time through the looking glass?

What time is it on this clock in the wedding picture and the one in the Instagram picture above?

I need a picture expert. Are they the same, with one reflected transformer? (I feel on a roll too!)

This sounds an intersting topic to expand on another thread. But I think you have the key to understanding this royal coup

On the Alice topic - I thought there were loads of references.

Alice through the looking glass is all about the white pawn Alice who moves through the chess game to become Queen. The story is set on a chessboard

The engagement - in KP garden. In chapter one Alice goes through the looking glass into the Garden of living flowers where she meets the Red Queen. Meghan got engaged and married in pure white.

The wedding - set in a castle with black and white bishops a queen and plenty of knights. There was no carpet on the knave floor and so they walked over a chequer board pattern on the floor.

In chapter 6 Alice meets the lion and the unicorn symbol of the monarch. If you look at the family photo Doria wore virtually the same colour as the queen. This apparently is not done must be a different colour. So it is as though there is a black and white queen in the looking glass image (there was another reference to this which puzzled me - Doria left her home in CA wearing a dog t shirt and the next day the queen was filmed going to the wedding rehearsals with Meghans beagle dog in the car so there was a specific linking of the two women again)

Exit Meghan wears Dianas aquamarine ring. Diana referred to herself as the Queen of Hearts. This was a character from Alice in Wonderland and she represents ungovernable passion. There is a scene where white roses are painted red. (a war of the roses or bloodlines reference)

In chapter 10 Alice now the white queen captures the red queen to get a checkmate.



Now a few days before this unlikely wedding Doria went to see Oprah Winfrey who at last minute got invited. So as Meghan had said in her vantity fair interview 'there are stories to tell', it was after this article (the editor of the magazine was fired the following day he'd been editor for 18 years) that Meghan first appeared officially with Harry at the IG games. I think there were manoeverings to get wedding called off and Doria just did a final arm twist to nudge the ball into the goal.

Who is using this chess game imagery so spectactularly at the moment? Why Q.

Meghan was a Soho House escort. Soho house is majority owned by a Mr Brock. He has a penchant for underage girls, used to be a friend of Geoffrey Epstein and his jet he calls Airfxxk One. He is a friend of Donald Trump. He was at the wedding. So I'd say Mr Trump and the White House are behind this coup and Meghan is the pawn but will she be elevated to Queen?

Meghan and the Markles: some key themes

It is uncanny how many connections the Markles have to topics, symbols and themes that we are particularly interested in - and how many exciting new ones they have generated!

References, both pictorial and verbal, are scattered all over this thread, with some pictures highlighted by also being posted in the relevant thread of the cross- board section.

I thought it might be useful to summarise the main themes as they might reveal clues to the Markles’ sudden appearance on the world stage.

Personal names with significant meanings. Thomas, Rachel; Zane; Doria; Louis and Loyce;

Place names with Markle and royal connections. Windsor Hills; Coronado; Buckingham Parkway; Monk Haven and Milford Haven. There are York connections too.

Red hair and blue/pale eyes. Thomas Markle Senior and Junior have this rare colouring, and ex-wife/mother Roslyn may have too.

Blue Orange. There are several pictures of Markles wearing these colours.

Hearts and the colour purple. Many references up-thread.

Pigs. A Meghan look-alike was in an advertisement with a pig. Meghan put a picture of a book called How to Roast a Pig on her old Instagram.

Rabbits. Thomas Markle Jr. wore a T-shirt with conejo, the Spanish word for rabbit, on it. There are many other references to rabbits in this thread.

The sign of worship/distress. Thomas Markle senior has made a similar sign, and it appears in a picture from Meghan’s Instagram. The twins who carried her veil raised their arms too.

Alice in Wonderland and Harry Potter connections. Lavendel made many great posts about that last one.

Henry (Harry) and Thomas then and now

From transformer:

“They got married on the anniversary of the beheading of Anne Boleyn by Henry VIII. I thought they chose the date as a tongue in cheek cos they didn't like her. But what if it wasn't the case? What did Henry do to marry her? Kicked out the catholic church to install his own religion.”

This has reminded me of something: there were two or three Thomases in that case! I need to refresh my memory, but I think that Thomas Cromwell worked on arranging the divorce/annulment from Catherine of Aragon whereas Thomas More was against it. Thomas Wolsey was involved too I think.

So we have several Thomases then and two Thomas Markles now. There is also the Harry Potter connection, with Tom Riddle Senior and Junior.

Thomas More’s second wife was called Alice Middleton by the way.

The religious aspect is a whole other story.

The Queen is not amused

Probably a composite picture, but one with a message:

"Rewatch the black preachers sermon he talked about a new religion and a new heaven and earth. I found it creepy."

transformer I still haven't been able to bring myself to watch this sermon, but what you have said is alarming. It makes me think of the New World Order.

Matthew Harbor: Prince Harry look-alike

Matthew Harbor, former student builder, is of interest mainly because people have used a picture of him with Prince Charles in connection with James Alexander, the man who allegedly claimed to be the real Prince Harry.

It all started with a DM article from 2009:

“Prince of Wales does a double take over Harry lookalike

The face was certainly familiar – but not the activity. Prince Charles seemed to have bumped into his son Harry on an official visit yesterday.

But would the young royal, famous for loving the party life, really have been busy with a trowel?

Probably not, but the Prince of Wales could be forgiven for his double take when he saw student builder Matthew Harbor. At 18, he is six years younger than Harry but could still try his luck as a royal lookalike.

The pair met when Prince Charles visited a £7.2million skills academy at Kirkby-in-Ashfield, Nottinghamshire.

Matthew, of Mansfield, later told how he has always been mistaken for Harry.”

Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1151303/Prince-Wales-does-double-Harry-lookalike.html#ixzz5Gd56Dg5R

Matthew’s eyes look less blue than Harry’s, more hazel, but he certainly looks very like him. Note the trowel:

Closed down for getting close to the truth?

@questioneverything , re what you said about KMReview and MMReview: I just don’t know. The author said there would be a short break for personal reasons.

I have no doubt that the royal PR people would like to see only good things said about all the royals, but the genie is out of the bottle. This is the internet age. I do think that some people go too far - in various ways. They make wild, unsubstantiated claims, pass on unpleasant rumours or sound very spiteful and mean-spirited for example.

For me, it is a question of not letting the royals fool us and get our support under false pretences.

I think that the Sherlock Holmes approach is best. The truth is what matters most.

James Alexander “The real Prince Harry” again

I first heard of this man around November 9th 2016, when transformer mentioned this him on the old CC forum:

“… also think this alleged affair has deflected attention from the strange death of James Alexander in Dublin. Whether or not he is the real Prince Harry it deserved media attention.”

I can’t remember what the affair was.

I saved the mention because I quoted it in June/July 2017 in a post about the imposters Perkin Warbeck and Lambert Simnel. I did this because Lambert Simnel was actually crowned Edward VI in Dublin, which was where James Alexander is alleged to have died. I thought it was a good coincidence.

I do agree that it is false news and/or a joke, triggered by the original 2009 picture. I don’t want to link to clickbait sites or those with a bad reputation so will just say that some commenter somewhere said that the real Harry would not have married Meghan.