Words of hope, wisdom and warning for the battle

Another mistake that ‘they’ make

“...the faster they move, the more mistakes they make, and the more people wake up...”

This is true, but it is not the whole story. They are also on occasion very off the mark.

They are not allowing for changes caused by factors such as the Internet and social media. Their communications are out of date. What might have worked 30 or so years ago is now not nearly good enough.

People are indeed waking up. They are not buying some of the statements put out by people such as politicians and the royals.

For example, simple denials from the likes of Prince Andrew are not enough to keep the people of today quiet. They want answers to questions raised by available evidence.

Theresa May used marketing techniques from decades ago by continually repeating ‘strong and stable’. Consumers from the 1950s may have responded to such attempts to influence them, but the people of today responded with ‘weak and wobbly’!

The Labour Party wants to abolish private schools. If Jeremy Corbyn thinks that this promise will cause many people to vote for them, he is delusional.

He would do better to talk about such things as the rise of zero-hours contracts and the cost of housing.

This raises the question of why they don’t realise that they are missing the mark.

I do like this thread, UnseenI . I've pondered a lot over the past few years about the growing evil in the world too and things seem to be escalating so much that it's hard to stay sane.

Not one of us can overthrow the whole damned mess, but we can all do our little bit and if a lot of people do that, the sum of that would be significant. We're all helping here on this forum, either by contributing to expose the lies or by visiting to inform ourselves. Tell your friends about what you learn! I had a job getting through to a friend about the 'faux Megnancy'; she'd shift about uncomfortably and reply, "well... that happens to some women..." but the breakthrough came when I sent her a timeline of the ever-changing bump. "OMG!" she replied, "It's so obvious when you see it like that, I'm showing this to the kids!" ... and hopefully they would have told all their friends.

People don't like coming out of their comfort zone of ignorance. There's the saying - "It's easier to fool someone than to convince them that they've been fooled".

All we can do is chip away at the system that tries to bind us. I do what I can to reject the system of consumer control. I don't watch television or movies unless they're classics from the past. With non-grocery shopping I rarely buy anything new, and I only buy what I need. I mend things, grow food, waste as little as possible, rarely travel far. I won't use debt. I use cash as much as possible as my little protest against the cashless society - will our money be accessed via an implanted microchip if cash is eliminated? How else could that track you?

I am also alarmed at the messed-up psyche of the British, so many obsessed with trashy TV, money, sex, celebrities (who the hell in their right mind would want to look like Kim Kardashian?) and conflict arises so often. Interpersonal skills are so lacking now. I do my bit of protest by being as kind as I can to people, helping out in my community and trying to remain positive as much as possible. It's hard sometimes, but I won't give up.

The battle between good and evil: a few general points

Two opposing viewpoints in summary:

-A pessimistic - or realistic - view is that evil will always triumph over good because evil people have no ethics and no empathy. They are brazen and unscrupulous, they bulldoze ahead and they just don’t care about the damage that they do or how much suffering they cause.

They have an army of captive pawns at their disposal and most other people are too naïve, trusting, powerless and ignorant of what they are up against to be able to stand up to and deal with them.

This sounds only too plausible. There is much evidence to support this viewpoint.

In other words, we’re all doomed!



-On the other hand, there is the view that the good people will win because they understand the mindset of evil people and can see through what they say and do but the converse does not apply.

For example, Gandalf in Lord of the Rings points out that the plan to destroy The One Ring may succeed because the Dark Lord would never consider the possibility that anyone who had it would not want to use it. He judges everyone by his own standards.

Lord Voldemort said, “There is no good and evil, there is only power and those too weak to seek it.” Look what happened to him!

Then there is the comforting idea that evil contains within itself the seeds of its own destruction.

It may be best to be on the side of good because then you get attacked only by the enemy, whereas evil people are in just as much danger of being destroyed by their own side as they are from the forces of light.

Connections and violent deaths

The posts in the Epstein threads contain many connections involving people of interest, some of whom were involved with the occult and/or died violently and/or mysteriously. Most of these people are/were not on the good side in the battle; some are/were very unsavoury characters indeed.

There are other cases involving people who have elements in common with some of the above-mentioned people, Peter Solheim from the Cornwall thread, who was involved in criminal and occult activities and died violently, is one example.

The Epstein case raises issues that have a wider application.

One of these issues concerns cases where someone has died, or appeared to have died, and there is some uncertainty about the cause - or even the death itself. There are several theoretical possibilities:

Murder, Suicide, Accident, Natural Causes or Staged Death and Disappearance.

Robert Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein and Jack Parsons are some examples.

When murder has been established, it may be a question of whether it was just an ordinary killing or whether it had occult elements and causes. A murder could have been a ritual killing for example.

Once again, Peter Solheim’s death is relevant here.

Another issue is whether the death was a punishment by external forces or a consequence of their actions and behaviour and only to be expected considering the circles they moved in - playing with fire and all that.

These issues will be discussed in future posts.

You are right. When it really is a case of murder, there is a string of usual suspects including the Mafia, various intelligence agencies and occult organisations.

If the Sussexes really do go quiet, it will provide an opportunity to work on other topics.

Another symbolic picture

I like the depiction of the battle between good and evil as a game of chess:

The murder of Peter Solheim

Peter Solheim was a very unpleasant character indeed. He was a Druid who became a Wiccan then a Satanist. He died a violent death.

He was first mentioned in the Cornwall thread because of all the Cornish connections.

He was mentioned here a while back because he was involved in both criminal and occult activities and his death raises a few questions.

When people die unexpectedly, in some cases murder is a possibility. When murder is established, in some cases an occult cause is a possibility - ritual murder or destruction by the forces called up for example. The victim may be a casualty in the battle between good and evil.

Peter Solheim may have been murdered for personal reasons and/or his death may have been connected to his criminal activities, but there are some elements that suggest an occult connection.

First, a few details:

“Margaret James, 58, is currently serving a 20-year jail sentence for conspiracy to murder her paganist lover Peter Solheim. However, her co-plotters have never been caught.

In June 2004, the mutilated body of Mr Solheim, 56, was dragged aboard the vessel the Clairvoyant by two fishermen after they spotted it floating in the sea off Cornwall.

The dead man had been drugged before he was hacked about the body with a blunt machete or axe and hurled into the sea – he did not die from his horrific injuries, but drowned.”

www.cornwalllive.com/news/cornwall-news/cornwalls-most-mysterious-unsolved-murder-3517641

That last sentence reminds me of the (mythical) story of the assassination of Rasputin!

The sensational story from The Sun:

Sacred Evil, Wicca and the death of Lynsey Pow

This is an addition to the posts in the Celebrity section.

Sacred Evil (2006) is a controversial Bollywood film with a paranormal theme. It is of interest for several reasons.

Sacred Evil is about duality, exploring the premise that reality always has two sides. Where there is light, there is shadow. It suggests that evil is stronger than the sacred. This makes it relevant to this thread.

The film is based on a true story from the case files of a real-life Indian Wiccan and self-declared witch Ipsita Roy Chakraverti. Sacred Evil is the story of three women separated by a twenty-year-old secret: a nun, a Wiccan and a girl in search of her mother.

While Western actors were needed to play one or two of the characters, it seems strange that Lynsey Pow, who later hanged herself after battling with drug and gambling addictions, should have been chosen for two roles. She was just a bit-player in various TV series

Sacred Evil, an Indian Wiccan practitioner... these seem like contradictions in terms.

The film can be found on YouTube. It is mostly in Hindi, with no subtitles.

Good and Evil and President Trump again

More about the children of darkness and the children of light from Archbishop Viganò’s letter:

“'They are subservient to the deep state, to globalism, to aligned thought, to the New World Order which they invoke ever more frequently in the name of a universal brotherhood, which has nothing Christian about it, but which evokes the Masonic ideals of those want to dominate the world by driving God out of the courts, out of schools, out of families, and perhaps even out of churches,' Viganò said of those Trump critics…

In society, Mr. President, these two opposing realities co-exist as eternal enemies, just as God and Satan are eternal enemies. And it appears that the children of darkness – whom we may easily identify with the deep state, which you wisely oppose and which is fiercely waging war against you in these days – have decided to show their cards, so to speak, by now revealing their plans,'“

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8408463/Catholic-archbishop-tells-Trump-protests-virus-deep-state-plot.html

The two eternal enemies:

Much easier said than done!

Blue eyes and blond hair versus brown eyes and black hair

Tsar mentioned David Icke’s theory about people who have blue eyes and blond hair: they are aliens or controlled by aliens!

There is another association, one that is relevant to the duality element in this thread: they are said to be children of light. If they are angelic and superior, then people with brown eyes and black hair must be demonic and inferior.

Jeffrey Epstein is said to have favoured blonde hair and blue eyes, and the children involved in the Hampstead case had this colouring...

Shepard Fairey says it in pictures.

Shepard Fairey is a warrior against what he sees as the darkness.

His artwork is full of symbolism: circles, triangles, sunbursts, eyes and the word ‘Obey’. Many pictures are in red, black and white.

Here are two good examples of his work: