The Strange, Twisted World Of Peaches Geldof

Peaches makes up with Fifi Brown

They obviously soon made up their quarrel and became friends again, as this strange story from 2009 shows:

“Peaches Geldof has announced she has got 'married' again - to her friend Fifi Brown.

The 19-year-old daughter of Sir Bob Geldof mocked her six-month marriage to musican Max Drummey by posing with Fifi, 25, both wearing joke veils over the head.

Peaches posted the photo on her Facebook and Twitter pages with the caption ‘Just married’. She and Fifi DJ together under the name Trash Pussies and she has previously referred to her friend as ‘my future wife’.”

Read more at www.southwales-eveningpost.co.uk/peaches-geldof-marries-dj-fifi/story-12440520-detail/story.html#V4o2G85FOdZqYC3R.99

Mirrored images from 2007 and 2009 :

Gottfried Helnwein

Peaches’ Halloween picture reminds me very much of some of controversial Austrian-irish visual artist Gottfried Helnwein’s work, which is very disturbing. I had horrible dreams after seeing some of the pictures on Helnwein's website for the first time.

I am particularly thinking of his pictures that remind me of the miserable-looking child models that have been featured elsewhere.

Here he is with a typical example of his work:

Astala and Astile: are these names just a coincidence?

One of Peaches’ sons is called Astala; Pete Doherty’s son is called Astile.

As mentioned elsewhere, Peaches had a connection with Pete Docherty.

“Singer-songwriter Lisa Moorish, has a daughter with Liam Gallagher called Molly and a son with Pete Doherty called Astile. She posts pics of the kids on her Instagram ...”

showbizgeek.com/lisa-moorish-the-celeb-instagram-you-have-to-follow/

“The name Astile was chosen for Pete’s son as it contains the name Lisa (Astile’s mother) and two letters from Pete’s name (t and e).”

http://instagram.com/p/BjX5DPpHkT1

Lisa Moorish with Molly and Astile some years ago:

More about Paula Yates's discarded belongings

There are some elements in the article that don't add up. People contradict each other – nothing new in Geldof stories!

Despite what it says about Bob Geldof's going through the house, Paula's close friend Belinda Brewin claims to have done the clearing herself and that only genuine rubbish was discarded:

“Belinda said she had cleared out Paula's Hastings house and all personal items had been packaged up and taken to London.

She said: "Every single bit of it was moved. When I went there I took all the rubbish from Hastings back to here. "Nothing went on the tip as far as I know - there might have been bits of broken stuff but no one threw this away. I don't believe it went on the tip. If it did I find it astonishing. This man should do something decent and give it back."“

None of this makes sense. How did the 'heartless binman' get hold of any items worth selling if nothing of value or interest was left out for rubbish collection? How can the binman give back things he never found on the rubbish tip in the first place? Is she suggesting that some of the bin bags were stolen while waiting to be moved to London? The article describes some of the items the binman had; surely no one would have deliberately thrown these away:

“Sitting in the front room at his Hastings home, Jury scattered the contents of four binliners on the carpet.

They included snaps of Paula and her Australian lover Michael Hutchence, dresses worn by Paula and others belonging to her daughters, notes for her autobiography and newspaper columns, household bills and details of debts she ran up after Hutchence was found dead in a Sydney hotel room in 1997.

Also in the haul were jottings and drawings by daughters Fifi Trixibelle, 18, Peaches, 12, and Pixie, 11.

And there were medical records for four-year-old Tiger Lily, daughter of Paula and Hutchence.

There was even a letter from medical experts informing Paula that DNA testing had proved she was not the biological daughter of Jess Yates, the man she had always believed was her father.”

Curiouser and curiouser...

Beliinda Brewin with Paula Yates and Tiger Lily in 1998:

Bob Geldof and the Hastings curiosity shop

The unusual A G Hendy home store and kitchen in Hastings was mentioned in the Sussexes thread because of a Wunderkammer connection. That is not the only element of interest, according to an undated, probably very old, article:

“In the meantime, on Saturdays and Sundays, the sun-filled courtyard at Alastair Hendy Home Store has turned into something of an unofficial lunch club for those with autograph appeal...Sir Bob Geldof has been seen lingering near the till...”

lady.co.uk/new-hamptons

The Hendy kitchen and courtyard where Bob Geldof was seen:

Two colourful pictures

Avacyn you made this comment in response to the post about the Paula Yates's London home, where the colour scheme in one room matched the Dalai Llama's:

“But... a lion on the floor? Remember, there was a lion in one of the Eli Roth Passover pictures...“

Here is the picture of Paula's room again, with a picture of Bob from 2013 that has a similar colour scheme and also has some big cat skins:

Another strange story involving Paula Yates

According to her former publicist Gerry Agar, who was involved in the above-mentioned binbag affair, Paula Yates could have married Charles Spencer, Princess Dana's brother. This unlikely story appeared in the DM last September:

“She married rock aristocracy in Bob Geldof, but Paula Yates could have become a genuine countess — and the sister-in-law of Princess Diana, to boot.

A close friend of Yates tells me that Diana’s brother, Earl Spencer, long before inheriting the title, became infatuated with the television presenter and even asked her to marry him . ‘Charles fell madly in love with Paula and proposed to her,’ claims Gerry Agar Fennell, who was Yates’s publicist.”

www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-8791917/SEBASTIAN-SHAKESPEARE-Princess-Dianas-brother-Earl-Spencer-fell-Paula-Yates.html

According to this source, Paula Yates was not impressed:

“‘He was obsessed with her. They met at a charity event, then he would pop round the house, and she’d say: “My God, it’s bloody Charles again.” ’

Yates — who died in 2000 — was already seeing Geldof when Spencer fell for her.”

Gerry Agar wrote a book about Paula, Bob and Michael Hutchence in 2003. It seems strange that she waited until 2020 to release this story.

IF the story is true and Paula had decided that Charles Spencer was a good catch, history would have been completely different and none of the Geldof girls would have existed. Who would Bob Geldof have married instead?

Prince Charles and Princess Diana with Bob Geldof, Paula Yates and Fifi at the Live Aid Concert in 1985:

Paula Yates and the colour purple

Paula Yates's mother Helene Thornton wrote a book of memoirs called Big Girls Don't Cry. The book 'sets the record straight about Paula' and was published with a purple cover.

Paula said something amusing about her mother that mentions the colour purple.

These pictures will eventually be copied on aletheia 's thread about purple symbolism:

I stumbled onto the original long posts I made for the DIF thread, so I thought I would post them up here, in case they are still useful.


---------------------------

hese people are not normal. They are puppets, and controlled. We cannot apply normal, rational motives or agendas onto them.

Peaches Honeyblossom Geldof died on 7 April, 2014, twenty five minutes to two, at Wrotham, Sevenoaks, postcode district 7DQ. She died twenty five days after her twenty fifth birthday.

25 days/years= 2+5 = 7
7 April 7+4=11
7DQ
7oaks
25 to 2 = 7 to 2... is this her sons? Two sons, and left them at 25? Or is it 25 2 2? Thus 29... 2+9=11? 7 to two reversed would be 2 to 7... 27? 2+7= 9.
2014=2+0+1+4= 9

Her biological grandfather, Hugie Green died aged 77

The repetition of the number seven is like a program being run, with whatever spiritual and mystical connections the number has being charged and fuelled up.

More analysis is needed of these numbers, because if there is Egyptian spirituality connected, then there will be multiple levels of meaning. The Ancient Egyptians had four to five layers of meaning to anything they did religiously.

Her death was reported by the Independent three days before it happens. Friday 4th April. 4+4=8. 8 can look like the symbol for infinity, eternity. This symbol, appears with Live 8, and a cushion she pictured, then posted up on Instagram, inside a red cross. It is interesting to note that she had an inverted cross on her left shoulder-blade. The left hand side has been historically connected with evil, with devils sitting on your left shoulder and so forth, since Roman times. The word 'sinister' comes from the Latin for 'left.' (2021 Errata It was between the shoulder-blades.)

There is an interesting Jesus metaphor in the fact she was announced dead three days before dying; a mirror of what Jesus had: he died, then three days later he resurrected. Also, Sky News broke the story of her dying as saying she was eighty five years old.

85= 8+5=13
8 five= 8 evif or evil? That is simply speculation. I t can be suspected, however, the 8 is to create a thought-form around 8, and resurrection. (2021 Edit: There might also be a connection with “Live 8” concert…)

The pictures of Peaches when she was little depict her as blonde, with blue eyes. This is historically a desirable genetic set of traits to have, for example the Nazis. It is meant to be that they are more likely to be psychic.

Peaches was born in Pisces, the exact time and place not known as yet. Psychic phenomena is associated with this astrological sign.

Peaches was clearly dabbling with the occult, with a heart tattoo altered, to include the letters OTO inside the shape in 2013. in the same place on the other arm is a heart broken in two. There might be a symbolism occurring there.

There might also be added meaning to the lower back tattoo she had:

I don’t believe in an interventionist god. But I know, darling, that you do. But if I did I would kneel down and ask him. Not to intervene when it came to you.

These are lyrics from a song by Nick Cave, Into My Arms. Out of all the possible lyrics, why these? It was meant to be a tribute to a boyfriend, who is a fan of the artist.

The death has been described as “Sudden and Unexplained,” but also as “Not Suspicious.” These statements contradict each other.

Also, there was a large number police at the house at the time of the death. To have large numbers present – particularly with forensics officers – when it is not suspicious is utterly idiotic. Forensics are present when there is a suspicious death, for example a murder. They also seem to have been focussing a lot of attention on the garden shed for some reason, removing a door in the process.

The whereabouts of the family keeps on changing. For several days it was reported that she was alone in the house, that the sons were both with the father, Thomas Cohen. This is not logical, because this was meant to be a trip to see his parents. I doubt any parent would have two children – one of them approaching two years of age – in a car for a prolonged journey on their own. Two parents are needed, to monitor and supervise the children, to prevent distraction of the driver. Peaches, for some reason stayed behind on a family outing. She has publicly endorsed – and practised – Attachment Parenting. This means that would have wanted to go with any journey, particularly family orientated. Also, the youngest, if not both of them, will still need breastfeeding. Additionally, it is impossible for a concerned neighbour to have contacted police, because the property is isolated, with a sprawling estate.

This story then changed to the youngest child being found next to her body. However, this again is problematic; at eleven months, the child would have learnt to crawl, and would be more likely to be exploring or investigating things. The child is more likely to assume the mother is asleep in this circumstance. There is also a lack of reason for the father to be away with the older son; he tried contacting Peaches, and when he failed, he asked a friend to check. Where was he that prevented him from going back to the house to check himself? If he had just one son, it means that he was not very far from home. What was he doing?

Police say they were called to an address near Wrotham, Kent following a report of concern for the welfare of a woman on Monday afternoon. It matters not how it is explained, there is no logical explanation for her to be checked up on, by anyone. Mere hours had passed, and crucially, she was at home – or supposed to be – the entire time. The time-line is incapable of generating any plausible chain of events to create her being discovered. Also, the police themselves, already stated, were the first at the scene. They were there following reports of concern. Therefore, no-one but the police could have found the body.

There is also no information on how anyone got in to find the body, and crucially, there is a lack of any real detail about location, position of body. In deaths that are not suspicious, details appear as to where they were found; eg Brittany Murphy was found dead in her shower. For no details to emerge like this, after so long, is highly suspicious in itself.

Also, Bob Geldof sorted out her personal effects. Why? She was married. That responsibility would fall to her husband, not him.

It is also alarming to note that she did not once make an online appearance on Instagram or Twitter the day she died. This is deeply unusual; if her death was sudden, she would have been posting up to that point, possibly giving clues about her condition in the process. She did not.

The cause of death is inconclusive. The pathologist involved is Doctor Peter Jerreat, a consultant pathologist from the Home Office. He is connected with a number of suspicious cases, where the results of examinations of cause of death were regarded as suspect, and potentially conspiratorial towards covering up the true cause of death. No second post mortem was conducted, the body was apparently released after the first one. Proper protocol has definitely not been observed.

Peaches Geldof has had a clear fascination with the occult, running several years. This culminated in the last year of her life coming out as a follower -if not a member – of OTO. This group has been connected with Crowley. Nine out of thirty four books in a 'shelfie' picture she posted on Instagram were about Crowley, or books he had written. The others are two books on biology – including a copy of Grey's Anatomy – a copy of the Book of Mormon, a copy of the Bible (King James Version), two books on the Kabbalah, a copy of translations of the Nag Hammandi Library, three International Travelling books – one of them Tanach, a book on classical mythology, a copy of The Golden Bough, a volume entitled “Three Books of Occult Philosophy,” The Fourth Book of Occult Philosophy, an old book on Judaism, a book about witchcraft, by publishers Llewellyn. The remaining books have titles either too faded, or too obscured to determine. It should be noted that this is not a collection of books that would be associated with a dabbler in the Occult; this is more theological than that. It is said she wasn't a member of the OTO, however. The placement of the books – in a much larger library collection, based on the photo, indicates that these books are referenced a lot in conjunction with each other.

Given that at least two of her tattoos have occult meanings, the occult aspect needs to be more closely examined. Ethnically, Peaches was a quarter International Travelling, through her father. At this point, there is clear proof that she is the biological child of Paula Yates and Bob Geldof. She gained the inverted cross tattoo whilst she was in a relationship with Eli Roth. During this time she definitely met Marilyn Manson, if she had not done so earlier. There is a picture, originating from her Twitter account, from 2010 with her, Marilyn Manson, and Eli Roth seated on a sofa together. The picture is worth investigating; on Eli's head is a lifted up mask, with the word 'goat' written on it. She is having her hair in an identical way to Marilyn Manson, and there are two necklaces around her neck. It might be a horizontal dagger with a wavy blade, the other is of a pattern and design of a “Star of David,” more appropriately known as a Seal of Solomon. Eli looks like he has a white doctor's coat on, and is depicted laughing, with a lion and monkey finger puppets on his finger, whilst holding a Polaroid of what appears to be an unidentified male. There is also a mask on the table in front of Peaches. The cups and plates could remind a person of 'The Mad Hatter's Tea Party' from Alice in Wonderland.

There is also the matter of a photo from her Instagram that showed a painting of a baby doll with Hebrew letters on the forehead. It is supposed to be from her grandmother, and depicting a golem. There is also a note she took a picture of, featuring a number of bizarre items. Analysis of the handwriting, with that from a school report she made, shows that the author of the note was herself. One is a drawing of Phaedra, who has defecated into a nappy, with flies attracted to it. Underneath, as a caption, are the words 'LIL POOPY' in capitals. No explanation can be provided immediately, except that this is clearly an important part of the message, particularly given the over abundance of photos of Phaedra.

You also have a drawing of Tom, her husband dancing with what looks like a dog down the garden path of a house, presumably theirs. The caption is 'tom and pospero dancing,' however the name of the animal is poorly written, and could be interpreted in a number of other ways, such as 'pospoo' or 'porpoo.' However, the fact that her husband is dancing with an animal is highly bizarre. Why would someone dance with an animal?

The next segment is that of a cat sleeping on what appears to be a rug, with the caption 'lil snufties asleep.' It should be noted the outline has been filled in, indicating that this is a black cat. This is a curious aspect, since there has been no indicators that the family owned pets. Also, if she really did own a black cat, it gets even more interesting, given the sophisticated and developed occult library she clearly possessed.

The next segment depicts a woman eating a massive pile of faeces from a toilet seat, whilst documenting the activity with a camera. The woman has a black bow in her hair. The caption for this seems to be 'keep doing your poop thing.' the woman seems to be smiling, with her eyes closed. Given the crudity of the images, to depict this would indicate importance.

The last segment that contains an image is that of her two sons; her eldest is depicted as something of a giant, with a hand on his brother's head. The baby brother clearly does not like this, and is evidently distressed. The older brother is depicted dressed for outdoors, with a bobble hat on. The caption is “ASTALA.” Astala has been written with the letter 'A' as a triangle, particularly the last one.

This series of drawings was titled as 'THE GELDOF-COHENS.' It suggests that this is an exceptionally dysfunctional family behind closed doors.

It should be noted that she was constantly, and consistently photographing her youngest son. One photo, right after birth, has him wearing a mask of her, with a butterfly and one eye altered. Could this be an indicator that she was aware that her youngest son has been specially selected for some special role or purpose.

It also suggests that she was aware that she might well disappear, hence the pictures. It was as if she was trying to raise attention to something. The last picture released was of her with her mother as a child. It was as if she was aware that it would be her last, and was distributing something she wanted to garner attention.

One core element to consider is the fact that Paula Yates was in fact the daughter of Hugie Green, who is clearly a suspect and dubious character. Given how her mother woke up one night and found both her husband and Hugie Green in the same bed as her. It is suggested from the retelling that she had no recollection of how Hugie Green had ended up in the bed in the first place. This is particularly interesting, given how difficult it is to find any evidence of her being pregnant with her supposed eldest child, Fifi Trixabelle. It is interesting to note the similarity between her and her nanny, Anita Debney. It is feasible that the child was made to become Paula and Bob's daughter, to ensue that Anita Debney could enter the family home. It almost feels like it was a dynastic union, one designed to breed specific people.

Consideration should be given upon the fact her husband is International Travelling, with a family that is connected. There is a history of social working in the family, which would mean interacting with families and children. Her husband's name is Thomas Cohen. Thomas is Greek, transcribing from Aramaic as 'Twin.' Cohen is a derivative, stemming from the word 'priest.' Thus, his name translates as 'The Twin Priest.' Given as well that Peaches had International Travelling ancestry, it suggests that the intent of the union was to create offspring that is more strongly priesthood. When you look at the occult library that Peaches Geldof possessed, it becomes quite clear that she was more than likely a priestess in her own right. It would also explain why she was connected to so many differing occult groups. It is quite possible that she was not a rank and file member of OTO, but a serving priestess for the elite members of the organisation, or performed ceremonies on their behalf. It would also help to explain the Agent Provocateur photo-shoot she partook in.

The goddess Andraste, or Andred, was worshipped by the ancient British people, and later by the Anglo-Saxons. She was to the Iceni a war goddess, and the Romans interpreted her as the goddess Victoria, since her name was used as the word for victory. However, the core of her worship was in the great forest called Coed Andred, later Andreds-weald. This is the origin of the name 'The Weald' in southern England today. It was a vast expanse, stretching at its peak from Kent to Hampshire.

In the modern day, parts of the forest are still extant, particularly in Sussex. The Runes of Andred were published in Doreen Valiente's Liber Umbrarum. This magickal alphabet originated with a coven in Sussex, the exact details of which died with Doreen Valiente in 1999. Doreen Valiente was a Wiccan who had been a direct pupil of Gerald B Gardner, the developer of modern day Wicca.

Gerald Gardner did not meet the self styled 'Witch King' Old George Pickingill, who is stated as ruling six covens in England, one being in the New Forest, and one in Sussex. There are claims that Pickingill had met with Crowley, but these claims are now deemed inaccurate.

It is likely that L Ron Hubbard had met Crowley, given the author and eventual founder of Scientology was involved in Thelema in the 1940s.

Crowley was initiated into the OTO – known fully as the Ordo Templi Orientis – in 1910. The OTO was originally modelled after, and associated with European Freemasonry. In 1912, Crowley had risen to leader of the British branch, reshaping it to fit his Thelemite beliefs. He was advanced to the Tenth Degree. He rewrote the initiation rituals of the first three degrees in 1930, leaving the fourth intact.

Membership is based on initiatory system with a series of degree ceremonies that use ritual drama to establish fraternal bonds and impart spiritual and philosophical teachings. Under Theodore Reuss, there were nine degrees, the first first six masonic.

Gardner had been given charter to run OTO camp in England, thought was later dismissed from this due to continuing ill health by Karl Germer. Gardner made much use of Crowley's published material when composing the Gardnerian ritual liturgy, which was eventually edited out by Doreen Valiente when she became the official custodian of the Gardnerian Book of Shadows after his death.

It is important to know these background details, because it is clear that there is a lot of cross-pollination of ideas between different religions, secret societies and cults. Within Wicca, at least in the more traditional Traditions, there are degrees of Initiation, three of them. It also is likely to be largely removed from the original influences, due to key influencers like Valiente and Scott Cunningham.

The connection with the above to Peaches Geldof becomes transparent when her library is considered. Crowley, Witchcraft, Thelema are all subjects in her library. Also worthy to note is the Nag Hammandi Library, which contained a large number of Gnostic tomes. Crowley wrote the Gnostic Mass, a Thelemite ritual that came to be a key part of the OTO liturgy.

Also, earlier in her life, Peaches had been a supporter of Scientology, and there had been a rather curious incident. Closer examination shows that there is more happening than would be initially assumed.

First of all, why was thatcoolguyben staying at a friends place before a trip to South America? And where in South America? It seems strange, unless he had no home of his at the time? But then, how could he afford to go to South America?

How did thatcoolguyben know the friends of Peaches? The only logical explanation is that Ben had the same circle of friends as Peaches. Thus, he clearly possessed wealth, or his family does. Which begs the question... who was Peaches staying with at the time? Clearly a female, judging by the account.

Also, she was leaving early in the morning and coming back late at night? For recording an album? If this was the case, why didn't the album makers go crazy when she didn't appear for recording? Time is money. Also, it seems as if this was a habitual routine for her. She must have been doing this for some time. I doubt it takes more than a few days to record an album, particularly if they are that intensely focussed on recording it. Also, what was this album about? Why did it never surface? There is scant detail on this event, suggesting it may well have been a cover for the actual reasons she was in LA at the time. It was also soon after this time that she started dating Eli Roth, and had met Marilyn Manson at least once.

“She says "have you been living here the whole time I have?" I laughed and thought this question strange, she was showing how oblivious she was to the world.”

- It would not be strange if she had been arriving and leaving in a mind control influenced state. It also highlights that she was having trouble recalling events that had happened to her at that time period. This reinforces the above commentary.

"The tattoo discussion leads to us deciding we should get each others names tattooed on each other."

- You don't get the name of a random stranger you have just met tattooed onto you. However, given the number of names already tattooed onto her by this point, would anyone notice? It also seems a similar theme, where people she has been intimate with ends up with a tattoo referring to them in some way. It is almost like she was being marked, or branded in some way.

"She told me she had a bit of heroin she brought with her from the UK and asked me if I was game."

- How did she manage to get it into America? It also suggests that she had been keeping hold of this heroin for a while... Also, Crowley was a heroin addict, her mother had died of a heroin overdose. Would she really be using a drug that had done so much damage to her life and family? Also, why hadn't she simply acquired the heroin in LA? It would be simpler than smuggling it through US Customs. Could it be that she was using a higher grade of heroin, and it was akin to pharmaceutical grade? She was clearly looking for fresh needles and cotton swabs. This indicates a cleanliness and attention to detail that is not present in the average addict. Also, this incident is the only clear occasion that she took any drugs. It has been speculated, and she has admitted that she dabbled in drugs. However, if she was as notorious a party goer as she was, how come thee are not more stories of her taking drugs?

"This is where things get weird. Close to 8am she starts saying how someone was coming to pick her up."

- To be honest, the entire night's events were weird. However... why was she saying this? If she was getting in at two in the morning, to be picked up at eight, that would mean she would have had four to five hours time to sleep. This is assuming half an hour to an hour either way to prepare for bed and getting up. Also, there is no mention of this fact later on. Where was she supposed to have been going? Also, why did she ask him to drive, if she was waiting for someone to pick her up? They could have driven her anywhere.

Also, they ended up in the Celebrity Scientology Centre. If it took them an hour to get there, given there would have been rush hour traffic to contend with, there is a five hour gap in the events. What had occurred during that time? Also, her alters would not have necessarily been affected by the heroin. Thus, she could have done anything, and not feel the effects. Also, it is highly strange they end up there, when she was clearly being picked up to go somewhere. Perhaps she was supposed to be going to the centre all along? Also, the sex seems to suggest a sex kitten effect suddenly coming into force. Maybe aspects of alters were leaking through to the core personality? It would explain the statement “We did it every way possible, and for a young girl she sure knew how to work it.”

It might well be safe to conclude that Scientology was as big as it was in her life at the time, because she was receiving tutlage in the occult and ritual practices that she would be performing in her life. It is also to be noted that she had no books based on Scientology in her 'Shelfie' picture. She didn't have a copy of Diatanics. It can be suspected that her mystic education was being focussed on an organisation higher up in the hierarchy, namely the OTO.

Agent Provocateur is a UK lingerie company, founded in 1994. It has a curious name, however. An 'agent provocateur' in an individual who is used to incite a chain of events, without showing the group using the individual's involvement in the affair. It is also a company that has had Peaches Geldof model for them a number of times, and was their brand face for a time, replacing Kate Moss. She also prominently featured in their 'Season of the Witch' advertising campaign. Below are included two descriptions of the campaign:

“Agent Provocateur are proud to announce the launch of a decadent new campaign, "Season of the Witch", to incorporate a feast for the senses with a new website, a new catalogue and a new collection of the most luxurious and sexy lingerie.

The first "tableaux vivant" scene from 'The Season of the Witch' features the decadent Daisy Lowe and Peaches Geldof as powerful temptresses, seducing and their virginal victims wearing the most lavish collection of sexy lingerie.” - talktalk.co.uk website.

“Peaches Geldof features in Agent Provocateur’s latest witchy tableaux. The 19 year old daughter of Bob Geldof, who married Max Drummey in Las Vegas last month, stars alongsied Daisy Lowe in an occult-themed shoot that would make Aleister Crowley proud.

Agent Provocateur, quite possibly the world’s hottest lingerie label, is owned and directed by Vivienne Westwood’s son. Whether or not their customers get up to anything close to the adventurous scenarios depicted in this campaign, the label certainly inspires the imagination.” - originally www.thevine.com.au/fashion/articles/peaches-geldof-for-agent-provocateur.aspx

There is a lot of information hidden away in the images, and it would be a disservice to process all of them, given that Peaches is only in some of them, and there is mounting evidence in many other aspects to process. There is a lot of indicators of MK control, with butterflies, leopard print clothes, masks being incorporated in. Focus, however, has to be placed upon one image in particular. This is saved as ap2.jpg. It contains a lot of occult imagery, and would take quite a bit to analyse. There are, however, three fruits being consumed: apple, strawberry and cherry. Cherry could mean innocence, and strawberries are connected historically with purity and innocence, and can in modern times be associated with aphrodesia. Apples are deemed a quite magickal fruit, providing knowledge and wisdom – as depicted by cutting it in half sideways, producing a five pointed star. It also is a sexual fruit, given the centre looks like female genitalia when cut from top to bottom.

There is also an owl swooping down from above, which is interesting. In most cultures they are regarded as symbols of death. In a few others, notably the Greeks, they were regarded as beholders of wisdom as well.

The biggest surprise, however, lies not with what can be seen, but unseen. There are figures that are not revealed until the brightness, saturation and shadow levels are altered dramatically. Mostly, they are above, with a couple on the left side. In this altered state, it makes an individual think more of Dante's Divine Comedy than a lingerie advertisement. It is as if there is an unseen crowd, jeering and egging on the participants in the room below. There is also the silhouette of what looks like curved horns of a demon in the background, with the head blocked by the silhouette of a pillar or something.

It is interesting how the whole shoot has been described by some as “an occult-themed shoot that would make Aleister Crowley proud.” Perhaps, given how he has been instrumental in certain secret and occult organisations that exist to this day, he might be.

One thing that is striking is how both she and her younger sister, Pixie, have both partaken in modelling work for this company.

Another detail is that her hair colour changes markedly over the years. This is notable, because it is the same tones and colours that both Britney Spears and Christina Aguilera have had over the years, along with platinum blonde, which was a favoured colour by not just her mother Paula Yates, but Madonna for a while. Hair holds key mystical significance in terms of length, as it can draw energy in, and act as a spiritual antenna for the universe. This is why the Yogis of India have long hair. It is also the reason why Britney shaved off her hair; she was wanting to get away from the role assigned to her. Now, however, she has probably gone through sufficient number of, and sufficient intensity of, brainwashing sessions that she is highly unlikely to break free again. She was inducted, at the same time as Christina Aguilera, into the priesthood structure of Hollywood during the infamous MTV Award ceremony. The song the two sung was to denote their dedication to the role of priestess, they were assuming the role of Maiden. This is reinforced by the wedding dresses, that they were to be 'married' to their assigned role.

Madonna was passing her role to them; she was being elevated. Not simply because she was proven worthy, but because there was no other option; she had lost a lot of her power over the people. This is demonstrated that her pop resurgence in the late nineties didn't have the same impact as in her earlier career. This was after her audacious mass ritual that is her 'Frozen' music video. It is entirely designed as a ritual spell to draw people to her, to create an increase in following. Whilst it succeeded, it failed to perform to their expectations.

Is it possible to conclude that hair colour denotes stages of initiation? If so, it would seem Peaches had reached a high enough level of initiation to be a powerful element in the priesthood. It would also explain the massive change in her once she had entered a relationship with Tom Cohen. She had entered a Mother stage of her role. Thus, she was moulded as such. Surgery, lifestyle... All for her to be shown performing her critical role, that producing two sons to continue the lineage. The first gift she was given by her husband was a Seal of Solomon. Could this be a symbolic gesture that she had gained 'promotion?'

Additionally, there is the fact she has worn red numerous occasions. Red in ancient times was used to denote royalty in women. This is why Mary Magdalene, of the Hasmosean royal Dynasty, wore red; she was betrothed to her husband, the ancestral king of Israel. This is what Jesus was. Two gospels start off with genealogy retelling, which would be irrelevant if Jesus was literally the Son of God. If his father was literally God, why bother with king lists? They were of importance, because he had to prove his royal lineage; indeed, the crime he was killed for was 'The King Of The International Travellers.' Also, not only was he of the Essene community, he was also a Nazarene, which held strict codes. One of them was to not cut their hair. Samson, a Nazarene, was punished severely when he had been tricked by Delilah into losing his hair; he lost his spiritual, and mystical might. It could be suspected, as a final tangential divesting, that Django Allot is having to go through some form of role-play, having to become a Samson-like figurehead, possibly having to show ritual acceptance of the role in the Savoury Squash advertisement. Fruit of the loin, not of the cloth might be a reference to the sacrifices offered by Cain and Abel.

However, their plans and designs for her were in jeopardy. She had clearly managed to break free sufficiently to realise what was happening to her. Rather than risk overt rebellion, like Britney Spears and Michael Jackson, she set upon an ingenious strategy. She was aware that she would likely never be truly free; indeed, Arizona Wilder seems to have now disappeared. She had stated that they still had plans for her, which was why she was still alive. She was simply to valuable to kill off, even if she was causing massive trouble and disruption. Peaches had become too valuable to the system, and she most likely never manage to escape it. She did, however, want to protect her offspring. Hence Instagram and Twitter, her intrepid initiative. She produced thousands of inane images and comments, carefully inserting into them a number of key and telling posts and pictures. She knew that when the time came, her pictures would be analysed, to figure out the nature of her death.

The Ian Watkins post was what tipped them off that she was silently breaking free of control. They no doubt studied her activities, and realised what she had done. They knew that she was becoming too much of a danger to their plans.

Fortunately, for them, time had run out for her, anyway; it was time for the next big ritual act for her to perform. They needed her to have a ritual death, but it was not to be like Diana, who impacted on the thirteenth column, and had her soul, organs and child ritually harvested and consumed. (However the unborn child is most likely a relic of veneration, like remains of the giant humans are relics of veneration in some Masonic Temples.) Like Arizona Wilder, she was too valuable to simply kill. Thus, in a manner similar to Jesus, her death was staged, and transformed into a ritual play.

She falsely died, then truly died, at least officially. Death has truly occurred, that of her life and identity as Peaches Honeyblossom Geldof Cohen. Just like the priest Simon the Zealot (Zelotes), and his priestly brother, Joeseph of Arimathea, Jesus was secretly saved from death by swift use of International Travelling law trickery and magician sleight of hand. Thus it is with Doctor Peter Jerreat, needing to send the message to those who can understand it, that she is being processed and fully transformed into a full occult priestess for them. Her 'resurrection' is likely to either be on her funeral, or more likely, when there is a date that is the 31st. However, she will likely be presented to a select few, as proof of her return.

Thus, she is a ritual sacrifice, in the sense that to sacrifice means to surrender of give up something. The sacrifice was her identity and life, to be given over to her role entirely.

This would also explain why the family was so calm over her death, because they knew what was destined for her; Bob would have known the moment she was conceived what her life was earmarked for. Pixie no doubt has a minor role, but it is of the two children of the Paula Yates and Bob Geldof lineage, that Peaches was so important. Fifi Trixabelle was to be groomed and trained for her role as conditioner and handler of victims to the successors to the MK ULTRA program, hence the ritualistic placing of her along with him. The Live eight picture shows that Peaches was excluded, almost as if she was being cast out like the Scapegoats of International Travelling tradition; casting all of the sins onto the animal, then casting it out of the community. It might explain her time in LA, a scapegoating period. It might also symbolise the time that Jesus spent in the desert.

Analysis of the Live eight photo also shows that the eyes of Peaches and Pixie are glazed, almost as if under hypnotic control. Peaches is also wearing red. She is leaning curiously, away from her family, Pixie towards Bob. A suggestion of the scapegoating division, perhaps? Fifi looks relatively normal, however facial and eye analysis indicates that there is something darker under the surface. The most fascinating individual in the picture is...

Heavenly Hiraani Tiger Lily Huchence.

When careful consideration is given, she is responding to the photo-call in a manner expected of a normal child. There is no evidence – at all – of any mind control. Hiraani is Sanskrit, and when translated, and placed in context of her full name, means 'Heavenly Gold Tiger Lily Huchence.' This is not a name like the other siblings; this is a title, a statement. Paula and Michael managed to have a child outside the system, and fought desperately hard to keep her insulated from the horrors that could befall her. Gold, it should be noted, is seen as incorruptible, as it cannot tarnish or corrode. This child was seen by her parents as the golden flower of their union. Nowadays, she is referred to as an animal, in keeping with the dehumanising. However, she is very much a wild card to the design, and they are perfectly aware of it.

Thus, two examples of the Ewok Effect might be evident; Peaches social media usage, and the Golden Lily.

On a final note, it is also interesting to note that the age of Anita Debney at time of her 'death' was 52, and Bob Geldof was 61.

I also discovered this, and not sure if i posted it already, but here it is, anyway...


Doctor Peter Jerreat: Doctor Cover-Up…[/u]


SOURCE: www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2124958/Darren-White-dead-surrounded-sex-toys-suffocated-love-game.html

2012:

A businessman found dead in a hotel bedroom, with a chain tightly padlocked around his neck, may have suffocated when a sex game went wrong, an inquest heard.

Darren White, 41, was discovered lying face down on the bed, surrounded by sex toys.

The body was already decomposed as it had laid undiscovered for several days and pathologist Dr Peter Jerreat told the inquest at Southwark Coroner's Court that it was impossible to determine a cause of death.

Mr Jerreat said: ‘Potentially this could mask someone being suffocated under the influence of drugs.It is possible to have suffocated during a sexual act.

‘I’m definitely not excluding third party involvement,' he added.

A violent sex film was in the DVD player when staff found Mr White’s body, and drugs paraphernalia was also recovered.

Mr White, originally from Colchester, Essex, had recently taken over forklift truck company United Lift Trucks.


SOURCE: www.ntnews.com.au/news/breaki...-1226872992184

2014:
THE first person to be charged with sex offences as part of the investigation triggered by allegations of abuse against Jimmy Savile took his own life by a deliberate drug overdose, an inquest has heard.

Chauffeur David Smith, 67, was found dead at his home after failing to turn up at Southwark Crown Court in London for the start of his trial on October 28.

A warrant was issued ordering Smith to turn up at court the following day, but when officers arrived at his home in London, they found his body.

Dr Peter Jerreat told the inquest at Southwark Coroner's Court that the cause of death was drug intoxication.

"He had been drinking, but not a significant amount," he added.

"There were no signs of injury."

Senior Coroner Dr Andrew Harris concluded that the case contained all the "ingredients" to prove he killed himself.

SOURCE: www.sevenoakschronicle.co.uk/...ail/story.html

2012:
THE family of a 99-year-old woman who died following falls at her home have demanded to know why hospital staff did not recognise how serious her injuries were.

Ethel Cogger, of Pilgrims Way, Canterbury, died at the Kent and Canterbury Hospital on April 14 last year.

An inquest heard on Thursday how broken ribs pierced Mrs Cogger's lung which led to the pneumonia which killed her.

Her son Ian Cogger asked pathologist Peter Jerreat: "Why didn't the X-ray show it up? It doesn't ring true that nobody picked up the broken ribs for ten days."

Mr Jerreat said the fractures were spotted, but added: "It is pretty unusual for a break serious enough to penetrate the chest to be missed."

He suggested a second, smaller fall which happened after the X-rays were taken had aggravated the fractures and caused the damage to the lungs..

The inquest heard that Mrs Cogger fell in her kitchen on March 10. Her daughter Susan Moon, who had moved in with her, said she thought her mother had hit herself on the oven.

On the night of March 31 Mrs Cogger fell in the bathroom. On April 4 she was taken to hospital but released.

On April 10 she fell out of her chair at home and was taken to hospital the next day suffering from confusion and shortage of breath. She was given oxygen and physiotherapy sessions but died in her sleep in the early hours of April 14.

SOURCE: www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=151923

2009:

THE FAMILY of a Walworth woman, whose decomposed body was discovered in her home last year having being partly eaten by her ten week old puppy, were left fuming after an inquest returned an open verdict on her death.

The news reported in September last year that the initial inquest into Dyana Maloney's death was suspended, following allegations presented by her brother Bill Maloney that her death was connected to his investigation into child abuse in children's homes.

Last Friday at Southwark Coroners’ Court the family sat through evidence given by coroners’ court staff, police and medical experts, to ascertain how Ms Maloney died in her Sutherland Square home.

In a heated session in the chamber Mr Maloney was left particularly frustrated that when police discovered the body they did not treat the scene as suspicious. He stated it was his and the family's belief that because of the decomposed state of the body it should have automatically been suspicious, in line with police guidelines.

An appearance at King's College Hospital just days before she was discovered, where she was treated for a blow she allegedly received to the chest, also left Mr Maloney feeling many questions remained unanswered over his sister's death.

Speaking to the 'News' after the hearing Mr Maloney said: "We never got to talk about evidence we wanted to. I still cry for my sister every day and what went on in there was not proper. We had no legal representation and the last inquest was suspended pending further investigation and there was no further investigation.

"If you want to know about the how, when and why of how somebody died you need to look at the evidence."

Mr Maloney, a documentary film maker, had recently completed a film about abuse at the controversial care home Haut de la Garenne in Jersey. The eight Maloney children all spent time in care, and Dyana was sent on sailing holidays to Jersey, where she was allegedly abused.

She part funded the documentary undertaken by her brother, and voiced her concerns about his safety in a diary while he was on the island filming.

Maria Maloney, the sister-in-law of Dyana, also felt they were not allowed to question a coroners’ officer as they would have wished. She said: "We were not happy with the way it all went; we weren't given opportunities to ask about what we wanted. When we spoke to the officer he said that they could release the body. We were concerned about getting rid of evidence but we were told the liver would be sufficient."

However, at the inquest Dr Peter Jerreat, who handled the post mortem, said there was no evidence of trauma in his analysis, although he could only return an unascertained verdict as to cause of death in his report.

The coroner returned the open verdict on Ms Maloney's death, stating that there was not enough evidence to establish exactly how she died.

SOURCE: www.thefreelibrary.com/Actor+...th.-a090211540

2002:
ACTOR Art Malik could face criminal charges after an inquest into the death of a fireman who drowned in his swimming pool during a drug-fuelled party.

Daniel Williams - the boyfriend of Malik's daughter Jessica - had taken a cocktail of drink, Ecstasy and cocaine before dozing off on a lilo, his inquest heard yesterday.

He is thought to have slipped into the water while asleep and been so intoxicated he was unable to save himself. On top of the drugs, he had consumed beer, wine, vodka, champagne and cocktails during more than 12 hours of partying to celebrate Jessica's 21st birthday.

Art Malik, 49, star of Jewel In The Crown and True Lies, was present at his pounds 1m home, but stayed in his bedroom with wife Gina while the party was under way downstairs, the inquest heard.

Police do not regard the death as suspicious but Scotland Yard said they had not ruled out drugs charges against Malik or guests at the house in Surbiton, Surrey, where detectives later found half an ounce of cannabis and traces of cocaine on three wraps.

Officers said five party guests had subsequently confessed to using cannabis or cocaine. A Scotland Yard spokesman said, ``Inquiries are continuing.''

A spokesman for Mr Malik said, ``He is on holiday and he has no further comment.''

West London Coroners Court heard how fellow guests discovered the 23-year-old London fireman at the bottom of the pool's 8ft deep end.

A post-mortem examination by forensic pathologist Dr Peter Jerreat found Mr Williams had alcohol equivalent to three times the drink driving limit, cocaine and the equivalent of four tabs of Ecstasy in his body.

Coroner Alison Thompson recorded a verdict of misadventure.

SOURCE (PRESUMED): www.justiceforsionjenkins.org.uk/watson.html

The Richard Watson Murder

Fewer than 10 weeks before the murder of Billie-Jo Jenkins, there had been another high-profile murder in Sussex. Richard Watson was shot dead as he arrived home from work.

Within two hours, Sussex police had identified a plausible suspect, only to let him go and instead arrest and prosecute the bereaved family members at the scene. This is the full story of that case.

On Tuesday 10 December 1996, businessman Richard Watson was murdered as he arrived home from work. The killer - ruthless, efficient, dressed in balaclava and jogging bottoms - shot him twice and then ran off. He was assumed to have been a professional hitman.

The case attracted considerable attention. Media interest leapt several notches, however, when the arrests were made. Linda Watson, Richard's wife, was a former model and one-time Miss Scotland runner-up. On 17 July 1997, she was detained at Gatwick airport. Simultaneously, her 21-year-old daughter, Amanda London-Williams, was arrested walking down Old Steine in Brighton. They were jointly charged with murder.

It was alleged that they had commissioned the crime and then concealed the gunman on the first-floor balcony, from where Richard could be shot.

The trial was set for Monday 8 June 1998 at the Old Bailey. However, at 5.35pm on the Friday beforehand, a brief fax arrived at the offices of Knights, Amanda's solicitors in Tunbridge Wells. It read:

No evidence will be offered by the Crown in the case against your client.

Instead of the trial starting, it was formally abandoned.

---------------------------

Following their arrests, Linda and Amanda were held in Haywards Heath police cells and then taken in separate police vans to Haywards Heath magistrates' court (approximately 40 metres away). They were remanded to Holloway prison, and stayed there for two miserable weeks while their lawyers desperately tried to arrange bail.

On the day before their crucial bail application, they were shocked to be told by a warder, "The word's come down that you're to be sent to the psychiatric wing". The implication was that they were suicidal. "Somebody had actually got a doctor to authorise this request", said Linda, "but we'd never seen this doctor."

Fortunately, human kindness prevailed and, wherever the orders had come from, the warders refused to implement them. The next day, their bail application was successful. Had they been by then in the psychiatric wing, it would not have been.

Nevertheless, the terms of bail were bizarre. Chris Lewis telephoned them at the prison, saying, "You're not going to like this." The women could communicate neither with each other nor with potential witnesses. This was an astonishing deprivation; by then, all family and friends were cited as prosecution witnesses. (There were over 400 names on the list.) Further, they were to live a considerable distance from the area and from each other, and had to report to the local police station between 10.00 and noon each day. They could not go out before 8.00am and had to return by 8.00pm. Naturally, all this would make it astonishingly difficult for them to prepare their defence.

Nor, since these conditions would last for many months, was finding accommodation straightforward. Linda opined that they may as well stay where they were while it was sorted out. "You don't do that", Lewis told them, "it's Holloway. You can't ask to stay the night."

In conditions that combined profound sadness and high farce (Amanda's cab took off in the wrong direction), they were finally freed -- Linda to go to an aunt in Bournemouth and Amanda to her grandmother's sister-in-law in Bolton -- to begin unhappy periods of purdah. The cab fares alone cost �530.

The crux of the prosecution case was that Watson was shot from the balcony of the family home. Accordingly, he must have acted with the support, and indeed at the instigation, of the two women in the house. There was, however, no evidence that a gunman had either been admitted to the house or lain in wait on the balcony.

Watson suffered two bullet wounds, both severe; the first to the neck, and the second down into the chest which caused massive damage to the heart. It was, unfortunately, impossible to determine which shot was fired first. Nor, as Dr Philip Alexander, the forensic scientist, pointed out, was it possible to say where each shot was fired from, as "it would depend on the position and posture of the victim at the moment of discharge".

Neither from Dr Alexander's evidence, nor that of Dr Vesna Djurovic, the pathologist, could the police extract information on which to base a prosecution. Further, another forensic scientist was asked to look for gunshot residue on the balcony, and reported back that there wasn't any.

Some months later, the police commissioned fresh reports from a different forensic scientist and a different pathologist. These opinions, from their point of view, were more helpful.

Dr Franco Tomei, the forensic scientist, was asked if the victim could have been shot from the balcony. Yes, he replied. Then, Dr Peter Jerreat, the new pathologist, asserted that "the most likely scenario was of the victim being shot from the balcony". It was immediately after the latter had conducted the second postmortem, on 19 May, that the body was released for cremation.

However, this method of investigation, with the Crown in effect touting for expert opinions until it finds evidence to match its theory (rather than matching its theories to the available evidence) is one that highlights the weaknesses, not the strengths, of criminal justice in Britain.

In any case, it was clear from his statement that Dr Tomei had only been asked to look at certain scenarios. Significantly, he had added, "I would consider any other possibilities which might be put to me". Also, Dr Jerreat had, crucially, qualified his assessment with the words, "assuming that the range was acceptable". For the moment, however, these caveats were ignored. It was on the basis of these new opinions that the prosecution went ahead.


SOURCE: thegibraltarchronicle.blogspot.co.uk/2005_09_01_archive.html

2005:

Commodore David White, the former Commander British Forces in Gibraltar, took drink and sedatives before he drowned in the swimming pool of his Mount Barbary home last January 8th, less than a day after being told that he was being relieved of his command.

An inquest into his death heard yesterday that Commodore White, 50, had been recalled to the UK pending an investigation by the Ministry of Defence police into allegations that he had used his credit card to buy pornographic images from a US website.

There was no reference at the inquest to the type of content on that site but UK press reports at the time claimed he was being investigated by Operation Ore, Britain’s largest inquiry into child pornography.

At the time of his death, Commodore White had not been arrested or charged.

--------------------------

Commodore White was last seen alive by Colonel Thomas Camp, Chief of Staff in Gibraltar at the time, about 90 minutes before his body was found fully clothed and face down at the bottom of the swimming pool at around 4.15pm on January 8th.

The Commodore had looked “weary and distracted” Colonel Camp told the inquest.

Squadron Leader Nigel Forshaw, the Commodore’s military assistant who had been ordered to assist with his arrangements to return to the UK that weekend, found the body. Military and police officers who arrived at the scene shortly after found nothing to suggest foul play.

Peter Jerreat, a Home Office pathologist, said the Commodore’s body displayed numerous bruises and grazes but none that could account for his death, suggesting that he may have fallen over a number of times before he drowned.

A post mortem on Commodore White showed 61 mg of alcohol per 100 ml of blood – which is under the UK drink-drive limit – but also showed levels of the sedative Zoplicon that were “higher than normal for therapeutic use.”

“This could have caused impairment of coordination and impaired judgement,” Dr Jerreat said. “Death was clearly due to drowning,” he concluded.


SOURCE: www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-457212/NatWest-Three-bankers-suicide-park.html

2007:
A banker killed himself after being caught up in the NatWest Three fraud case, an inquest has heard.

Neil Coulbeck, 53, slit his wrists in parkland near his home because he feared he would be extradited to stand trial in the US.

His former colleagues, David Bermingham, Gary Mulgrew and Giles Darby, are due to stand trial in Texas in October. They face lengthy sentences if found guilty of an alleged fraud in connection with the collapse of energy giant Enron.

Mr Coulbeck's widow Susan said her husband died within days of telling her he was afraid of being "dragged into" the case - even though he had been assured he was in the clear.

Mr Coulbeck, a former executive at the Royal Bank of Scotland, which owns NatWest, had been interviewed by the FBI. Mrs Coulbeck, of Woodford Green, said: "I do not think it was a pleasant experience."

...........

Mrs Coulbeck said the following day her husband contacted the Royal Bank of Scotland to speak to a lawyer. He was waiting for a return call at 7pm but had gone for a "long walk".

She said: "When he had not returned for that call by 7.10pm I had an inkling something was wrong and went to the police."

Six days later Mr Coulbeck's body was discovered by an off-duty community support officer Kieran Ferguson who told the court: "I got to a very sharp steep bank and I saw the body of Mr Coulbeck."

He said the man was obviously dead and had been there for some time.

Pathologist Dr Peter Jerreat said Mr Coulbeck was found lying in a thicket, with two knives, a water bottle and two small pieces of foil, possibly from a blister pack, nearby.

He had a large wound to his left wrist.

Toxicology tests had found no substances in his body. Dr Jerreat said he was satisfied that there was nothing to suggest foul play or that anyone else was involved.

He also said the cause of death was haemorrhaging from the wound on his wrist. [/u]

SOURCE: www.myantiwar.org/view/258585.html

1 July 2013 Last updated at 18:13


No evidence Iraqis were tortured, pathologist says
Mizal Karim Al-Sweady Mizal Karim Al-Sweady told the inquiry in March that his son Hamid appeared to have been tortured

A Home Office pathologist has told a public inquiry that he has not seen any evidence to support claims that British troops tortured and killed Iraqis.

Dr Peter Jerreat examined photographs and DVDs of seven of 20 Iraqis killed in May 2004, and said their injuries were most likely to have been sustained on the battlefield.

He was testifying at the Al-Sweady Inquiry, which is examining claims that UK soldiers mistreated detainees.

The MoD vigorously denies the claims.

Dr Jerreat said it was possible to give a "valid opinion" on the nature of the injuries visible in the photographs.

But it was difficult to determine the cause of death without being able to carry out an internal examination, he added.

Asked if there was evidence of torture or mutilation when describing pictures of one of the bodies, he said: "No, I thought the injuries seen were entirely compatible with the sort of thing that might happen with weaponry or bullets."

The inquiry was adjourned until Tuesday morning, when the pathologist will continue to give evidence.

It was set up to consider allegations that a number of Iraqi nationals were abused by British troops in the aftermath of a firefight near Majar al Kabir, which became known as the battle of Danny Boy.

At a High Court hearing in 2009, Khuder Al-Sweady, an Iraqi national, alleged his nephew was one of those said to have been unlawfully killed in the custody of British troops at Camp Abu Naji between 14 and 15 May 2004.

Mizal Karim al-Sweady told the inquiry in March that his son Hamid - after whom the inquiry is named - appeared to have been tortured before he was killed, and he had seen bodies of other victims with a "combination of injuries" including "eyes missing, tongues cut out [and] teeth removed".

But the inquiry also heard that Mr al-Sweady had previously said he saw only one body with eyes missing and one with a broken nose.

Is it my imagination, or are the flaps to the cardboard box burned?

I did post some extracts from your masterwork early on in this thread, but that was ages ago and there may be new connections and references to consider.

There are still so many unsolved mysteries and unanswered questions in this case.

Bob, Paula and Michael inspired a novel

I posted this on the old forum in 2017:

“The tragic celebrity love triangle between Bob Geldof, Michael Hutchence and Paula Yates has been retold as a 19th century period novel depicting Geldof as a penny-pinching, jilted husband called Eamon Bleakley.

Fans of the late INXS frontman Hutchence have been speculating about the eerie similarities between The March of the Foxgloves and the breakdown of Geldof's marriage since the book's release. But Daily Mail Australia can reveal author Karyn Hay based her novel around Hutchence and Yates' doomed love affair.

Hay's bestseller portrays Bleakley, based on Geldof, as a parsimonious husband whose wife has fallen out of love with him.“


Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4749150/Bestselling-novel-Bob-Geldof-Michael-Hutchence-Paula-Yates.html#ixzz4pGbyQOKD