Avacyn
Project Manager
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Avacyn on Oct 1, 2018 23:11:30 GMT
Paula and Peaches and two dark young men
I have tried to reproduce something I posted on the old CC forum. We noticed a likeness between many of the young men pictured with Peaches and Paula Yates. This is a good example. Peaches is with Thomas Cohen and Paula Yates is with Kingsley O’Keke, addict and convicted thief. She started seeing him 10 months after Michael Hutchence died. You might well have something here. I wonder what Peaches' first husband looked like?
|
|
|
Post by transformer on Nov 2, 2018 18:53:24 GMT
This from CDAN you might find interesting
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,278
|
Post by UnseenI on Nov 3, 2018 8:35:55 GMT
Interested? That is a bombshell. I had never ever considered this possibility. It would explain a lot if true.
Do you think it is safe to repeat it? I wouldn't like to see this place shut down.
|
|
Avacyn
Project Manager
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Avacyn on Nov 3, 2018 10:15:05 GMT
I spent an hour or so trying to verify what transformer posted up. I am saying it's just gossip,because there is no source citations. If it cannot be verified, it has to be regarded as gossip,or unsubstantiated claims. I know this attitude from me sucks, but what we put up needs to be verifiable. This forum has to be credible, or people will not take us seriously.
|
|
|
Post by transformer on Nov 5, 2018 18:40:03 GMT
It absolutely is gossip. The CDAN site is a gossip site, although the person who runs it Enty Lawyer (short for entertainment lawyer) only publishes from good informants. He has not been sued and claims himself the reason is because he tells the truth so suing would expose the person to unwanted scrutiny. However it remains none the less, gossip.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,278
|
Post by UnseenI on Nov 5, 2018 19:51:49 GMT
Some unscrupulous people present rumours, gossip,speculation and fiction as established fact - to get attention, clicks, money etc.
I think that the reverse may be true - clever people may make the truth seem like gossip or fiction just to get the word out.
|
|
Avacyn
Project Manager
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Avacyn on Nov 13, 2018 5:47:44 GMT
I need to take a look, to see if there is any information I have stored about Peaches, that could go up here. Might also sneak a visit to Wrotham, to see if there is anything useful to observe.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,278
|
Post by UnseenI on Apr 9, 2019 7:16:58 GMT
Five years ago
The news broke on Monday April 7th 2014.
It seems like a century ago.
Life has gone on, and unless someone breaks their silence nothing more remains to be added to the story. Other topics have taken over.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,278
|
Post by UnseenI on Apr 17, 2019 8:04:09 GMT
Fifth anniversary of a very exceptional post
On April 17th 2014, a new member of the David Icke Forum came to the Peaches Geldof thread and made a sensational first post that attracted a lot of attention. It was packed with information, some esoteric, that must have been the product of huge amounts of research; it covered many aspects of the case and contained many leads. There are references to material, some not for the squeamish, that has since vanished from the Internet. Bits of this amazing contribution were put on the CC Forum and when that was closed on here, but I think it deserves to be posted in its entirety - although in sections as it is very long. We have learned a lot since April 2014 when the investigation was still in the early stages, and some of the material may not be applicable now. Many new connections have been made and much new material found. Some of the ground has since been covered many times, and some points and questions have been raised and answered - or debunked - many times too. Here is the link to the original post: 17-04-2014, 04:29 PM forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=271741&page=62
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,278
|
Post by UnseenI on Apr 17, 2019 8:05:32 GMT
Part I of Avacyn’s first ever David Icke Forum post
“These people are not normal. They are puppets, and controlled. We cannot apply normal, rational motives or agendas onto them. Peaches Honeysuckle Geldof died on 7 April, 2014, twenty five minutes to two, at Wrotham, Sevenoaks, postcode district 7DQ. She died twenty five days after her twenty fifth birthday. 25 days/years= 2+5 = 7 7 April 7+4=11 7DQ 7oaks 25 to 2 = 7 to 2... is this her sons? Two sons, and left them at 25? Or is it 25 2 2? Thus 29... 2+9=11? 7 to two reversed would be 2 to 7... 27? 2+7= 9. 2014=2+0+1+4= 9 Her biological grandfather, Hugie Green died aged 77 The repetition of the number seven is like a program being run, with whatever spiritual and mystical connections the number has being charged and fuelled up. More analysis is needed of these numbers, because if there is Egyptian spirituality connected, then there will be multiple levels of meaning. The Ancient Egyptians had four to five layers of meaning to anything they did religiously. Her death was reported by the Independent three days before it happens. Friday 4th April. 4+4=8. 8 can look like the symbol for infinity, eternity. This symbol, appears with Live 8, and a cushion she pictured, then posted up on Instagram, inside a red cross. It is interesting to note that she had an inverted cross on her left shoulder-blade. The left hand side has been historically connected with evil, with devils sitting on your left shoulder and so forth, since Roman times. The word 'sinister' comes from the Latin for 'left.' There is an interesting Jesus metaphor in the fact she was announced dead three days before dying; a mirror of what Jesus had: he died, then three days later he resurrected. Also, Sky News broke the story of her dying as saying she was eighty five years old. 85= 8+5=13 8 five= 8 evif or evil? That is simply speculation. I t can be suspected, however, the 8 is to create a thought-form around 8, and resurrection. The pictures of Peaches when she was little depict her as blonde, with blue eyes. This is historically a desirable genetic set of traits to have, for example the Nazis. It is meant to be that they are more likely to be psychic. Peaches was born in Pisces, the exact time and place not known as yet. Psychic phenomena is associated with this astrological sign. Peaches was clearly dabbling with the occult, with a heart tattoo altered, to include the letters OTO inside the shape in 2013. in the same place on the other arm is a heart broken in two. There might be a symbolism occurring there.”
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,278
|
Post by UnseenI on Apr 17, 2019 8:06:41 GMT
Part II of Avacyn’s first ever David Icke Forum post
“There might also be added meaning to the lower back tattoo she had: I don’t believe in an interventionist god. But I know, darling, that you do. But if I did I would kneel down and ask him. Not to intervene when it came to you. These are lyrics from a song by Nick Cave, Into My Arms. Out of all the possible lyrics, why these? It was meant to be a tribute to a boyfriend, who is a fan of the artist. The death has been described as “Sudden and Unexplained,” but also as “Not Suspicious.” These statements contradict each other. Also, there was a large number police at the house at the time of the death. To have large numbers present – particularly with forensics officers – when it is not suspicious is utterly idiotic. Forensics are present when there is a suspicious death, for example a murder. They also seem to have been focussing a lot of attention on the garden shed for some reason, removing a door in the process. The whereabouts of the family keeps on changing. For several days it was reported that she was alone in the house, that the sons were both with the father, Thomas Cohen. This is not logical, because this was meant to be a trip to see his parents. I doubt any parent would have two children – one of them approaching two years of age – in a car for a prolonged journey on their own. Two parents are needed, to monitor and supervise the children, to prevent distraction of the driver. Peaches, for some reason stayed behind on a family outing. She has publicly endorsed – and practised – Attachment Parenting. This means that would have wanted to go with any journey, particularly family orientated. Also, the youngest, if not both of them, will still need breastfeeding. Additionally, it is impossible for a concerned neighbour to have contacted police, because the property is isolated, with a sprawling estate. This story then changed to the youngest child being found next to her body. However, this again is problematic; at eleven months, the child would have learnt to crawl, and would be more likely to be exploring or investigating things. The child is more likely to assume the mother is asleep in this circumstance. There is also a lack of reason for the father to be away with the older son; he tried contacting Peaches, and when he failed, he asked a friend to check. Where was he that prevented him from going back to the house to check himself? If he had just one son, it means that he was not very far from home. What was he doing? Police say they were called to an address near Wrotham, Kent following a report of concern for the welfare of a woman on Monday afternoon. It matters not how it is explained, there is no logical explanation for her to be checked up on, by anyone. Mere hours had passed, and crucially, she was at home – or supposed to be – the entire time. The time-line is incapable of generating any plausible chain of events to create her being discovered. Also, the police themselves, already stated, were the first at the scene. They were there following reports of concern. Therefore, no-one but the police could have found the body. There is also no information on how anyone got in to find the body, and crucially, there is a lack of any real detail about location, position of body. In deaths that are not suspicious, details appear as to where they were found; eg Brittany Murphy was found dead in her shower. For no details to emerge like this, after so long, is highly suspicious in itself. Also, Bob Geldof sorted out her personal effects. Why? She was married. That responsibility would fall to her husband, not him. It is also alarming to note that she did not once make an online appearance on Instagram or Twitter the day she died. This is deeply unusual; if her death was sudden, she would have been posting up to that point, possibly giving clues about her condition in the process. She did not.”
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,278
|
Post by UnseenI on Apr 17, 2019 8:09:51 GMT
Part III of Avacyn’s first ever David Icke Forum post
“The cause of death is inconclusive. The pathologist involved is Doctor Peter Jerreat, a consultant pathologist from the Home Office. He is connected with a number of suspicious cases, where the results of examinations of cause of death were regarded as suspect, and potentially conspiratorial towards covering up the true cause of death. No second post mortem was conducted, the body was apparently released after the first one. Proper protocol has definitely not been observed. Peaches Geldof has had a clear fascination with the occult, running several years. This culminated in the last year of her life coming out as a follower -if not a member – of OTO. This group has been connected with Crowley. Nine out of thirty four books in a 'shelfie' picture she posted on Instagram were about Crowley, or books he had written. The others are two books on biology – including a copy of Grey's Anatomy – a copy of the Book of Mormon, a copy of the Bible (King James Version), two books on the Kabbalah, a copy of translations of the Nag Hammandi Library, three International Travelling books – one of them Tanach, a book on classical mythology, a copy of The Golden Bough, a volume entitled “Three Books of Occult Philosophy,” The Fourth Book of Occult Philosophy, an old book on Judaism, a book about witchcraft, by publishers Llewellyn. The remaining books have titles either too faded, or too obscured to determine. It should be noted that this is not a collection of books that would be associated with a dabbler in the Occult; this is more theological than that. It is said she wasn't a member of the OTO, however. The placement of the books – in a much larger library collection, based on the photo, indicates that these books are referenced a lot in conjunction with each other. Given that at least two of her tattoos have occult meanings, the occult aspect needs to be more closely examined. Ethnically, Peaches was a quarter International Travelling, through her father. At this point, there is clear proof that she is the biological child of Paula Yates and Bob Geldof. She gained the inverted cross tattoo whilst she was in a relationship with Eli Roth. During this time she definitely met Marilyn Manson, if she had not done so earlier. There is a picture, originating from her Twitter account, from 2010 with her, Marilyn Manson, and Eli Roth seated on a sofa together. The picture is worth investigating; on Eli's head is a lifted up mask, with the word 'goat' written on it. She is having her hair in an identical way to Marilyn Manson, and there are two necklaces around her neck. It might be a horizontal dagger with a wavy blade, the other is of a pattern and design of a “Star of David,” more appropriately known as a Seal of Solomon. Eli looks like he has a white doctor's coat on, and is depicted laughing, with a lion and monkey finger puppets on his finger, whilst holding a Polaroid of what appears to be an unidentified male. There is also a mask on the table in front of Peaches. The cups and plates could remind a person of 'The Mad Hatter's Tea Party' from Alice in Wonderland. There is also the matter of a photo from her Instagram that showed a painting of a baby doll with Hebrew letters on the forehead. It is supposed to be from her grandmother, and depicting a golem. There is also a note she took a picture of, featuring a number of bizarre items. Analysis of the handwriting, with that from a school report she made, shows that the author of the note was herself. One is a drawing of Phaedra, who has defecated into a nappy, with flies attracted to it. Underneath, as a caption, are the words 'LIL POOPY' in capitals. No explanation can be provided immediately, except that this is clearly an important part of the message, particularly given the over abundance of photos of Phaedra. You also have a drawing of Tom, her husband dancing with what looks like a dog down the garden path of a house, presumably theirs. The caption is 'tom and pospero dancing,' however the name of the animal is poorly written, and could be interpreted in a number of other ways, such as 'pospoo' or 'porpoo.' However, the fact that her husband is dancing with an animal is highly bizarre. Why would someone dance with an animal? The next segment is that of a cat sleeping on what appears to be a rug, with the caption 'lil snufties asleep.' It should be noted the outline has been filled in, indicating that this is a black cat. This is a curious aspect, since there has been no indicators that the family owned pets. Also, if she really did own a black cat, it gets even more interesting, given the sophisticated and developed occult library she clearly possessed.”
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,278
|
Post by UnseenI on Apr 17, 2019 8:11:33 GMT
Part IV of Avacyn’s first ever David Icke Forum post
“The next segment depicts a woman eating a massive pile of faeces from a toilet seat, whilst documenting the activity with a camera. The woman has a black bow in her hair. The caption for this seems to be 'keep doing your poop thing.' the woman seems to be smiling, with her eyes closed. Given the crudity of the images, to depict this would indicate importance. The last segment that contains an image is that of her two sons; her eldest is depicted as something of a giant, with a hand on his brother's head. The baby brother clearly does not like this, and is evidently distressed. The older brother is depicted dressed for outdoors, with a bobble hat on. The caption is “ASTALA.” Astala has been written with the letter 'A' as a triangle, particularly the last one. This series of drawings was titled as 'THE GELDOF-COHENS.' It suggests that this is an exceptionally dysfunctional family behind closed doors. It should be noted that she was constantly, and consistently photographing her youngest son. One photo, right after birth, has him wearing a mask of her, with a butterfly and one eye altered. Could this be an indicator that she was aware that her youngest son has been specially selected for some special role or purpose. It also suggests that she was aware that she might well disappear, hence the pictures. It was as if she was trying to raise attention to something. The last picture released was of her with her mother as a child. It was as if she was aware that it would be her last, and was distributing something she wanted to garner attention. One core element to consider is the fact that Paula Yates was in fact the daughter of Hugie Green, who is clearly a suspect and dubious character. Given how her mother woke up one night and found both her husband and Hugie Green in the same bed as her. It is suggested from the retelling that she had no recollection of how Hugie Green had ended up in the bed in the first place. This is particularly interesting, given how difficult it is to find any evidence of her being pregnant with her supposed eldest child, Fifi Trixabelle. It is interesting to note the similarity between her and her nanny, Anita Debney. It is feasible that the child was made to become Paula and Bob's daughter, to ensue that Anita Debney could enter the family home. It almost feels like it was a dynastic union, one designed to breed specific people. Consideration should be given upon the fact her husband is International Travelling, with a family that is connected. There is a history of social working in the family, which would mean interacting with families and children. Her husband's name is Thomas Cohen. Thomas is Greek, transcribing from Aramaic as 'Twin.' Cohen is a derivative, stemming from the word 'priest.' Thus, his name translates as 'The Twin Priest.' Given as well that Peaches had International Travelling ancestry, it suggests that the intent of the union was to create offspring that is more strongly priesthood. When you look at the occult library that Peaches Geldof possessed, it becomes quite clear that she was more than likely a priestess in her own right. It would also explain why she was connected to so many differing occult groups. It is quite possible that she was not a rank and file member of OTO, but a serving priestess for the elite members of the organisation, or performed ceremonies on their behalf. It would also help to explain the Agent Provocateur photo-shoot she partook in.”
|
|
Avacyn
Project Manager
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Avacyn on Jun 12, 2019 8:59:33 GMT
As a quick aside, her husband was a Cohen. This is priestly caste, thus she would have been wholly unsuitable to marry him. Thus, she has to be a Jem herself. In part, or in whole.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,278
|
Post by UnseenI on Jun 13, 2019 18:59:23 GMT
As a quick aside, her husband was a Cohen. This is priestly caste, thus she would have been wholly unsuitable to marry him. Thus, she has to be a Jem herself. In part, or in whole. That could be a name similar to Smith or Baker, where the original connection to an occupation has been lost!
|
|
Avacyn
Project Manager
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Avacyn on Jun 14, 2019 6:37:35 GMT
As a quick aside, her husband was a Cohen. This is priestly caste, thus she would have been wholly unsuitable to marry him. Thus, she has to be a Jem herself. In part, or in whole. That could be a name similar to Smith or Baker, where the original connection to an occupation has been lost! No. I was told this about five years ago, by someone who had married a Jem. She had said it in private, because she hadn't wanted it known, so the others on the forum would go into metdown over it. Also, Tom had said that Peaches had recently found out her grandmother was Jemmish, in an interview one time. If that's so... then it would be Bob's mother. And he's famously said he's quarter Jemmish, and nothing has ever surfaced about his mother ever turning out to be Jemmish. So... where is this grandmother? And remember her instagram? There was that weird doll painting, whish had been given to her by her grandmother. With the Hebrew on the head. Well, it turns out it's a picture of a golem. But... it means there was a Jemmish grandmother. If you look at Paula Yates, you soo there is nothing Jemmish with that family. So... where is this grandmother coming from? Unless this is all indirect evidence of her not being Paula Yates' daughter? That's my thoughts, anyway.
|
|
Avacyn
Project Manager
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Avacyn on Jul 3, 2019 6:52:25 GMT
This from CDAN you might find interesting Just seen this again. I'm not convinced of this. There is no way that Bob would let it rest. Look at Paula Yates, and Micheal Hutchence. Also, it doesn't make sense of the timeline. He was supposed to be away for the weekend. The more I look at it, the more I see it as misinformation. Probably to work out who Enty Lawyer is. And if she was murdered, it would be much more straightforwards. When things keep on changing withh the official story, there is a massive cover-up going on. My take on it all.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,278
|
Post by UnseenI on Aug 12, 2019 17:17:29 GMT
Geldofs at Soho House
Soho House first appeared in the Sussexes thread because of the connection with Meghan Markle.
The web is much wider that that. There are Geldof connections too. A quick search brings up several references.
Bob Geldof is mentioned in a photograph in connection with Soho House in 2001. He gave interviews in the London Soho House in 2003, 2004 and 2005.
Behind the Black Door by Sarah Brown (wife of former Prime Minister Gordon Brown) mentions a dinner in 2008 at Soho House in New York to which Bob Geldof, Emma Freud and Richard Curtis came.
Bob held the Band Aid 30 press conference at the Berlin Soho House in 2014.
In recent years, Pixie Geldof has been to Soho House in London and to the Farmhouse in the Cotswolds with Daisy Lowe.
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,278
|
Post by UnseenI on Aug 12, 2019 17:19:28 GMT
Thomas Cohen and Soho House
Thomas Cohen has some Soho House connections. Avacyn this has relevance to the Epstein thread too. It also shows how old posts can become topical again and more significant in the light of new information and developments. Pixie Geldof, Daisy Lowe and Thomas Cohen attended Nick Grimshaw’s birthday party at the Soho House in Shoreditch in 2014. Thomas Cohen gave an interview in 2016 in a “private members’ club in Soho”. I remember how we monitored his actions on the old CC forum, and posted about his trips to exotic seaside resorts. There were some pictures of him with a girl whose face was not visible - it turned out to be Daisy Lowe. From the DM in January 2016: “...was taken in Tom’s room at the exclusive celebrity haunt Soho Beach House in Miami and posted by his chum Jack Guinness, who joined Tom, 25, Pixie and others there for a New Year’s Eve party.” www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3382216/GIRL-TOWN-Tom-Cohen-dating-Geldof-Peaches-husband-snapped-series-intriguing-pictures-holidaying-Miami.htmlSoho Beach House is part of Nick Jones’s Soho House empire. At the time, the name meant nothing to us! Jack Guinness is a model. I am not sure how closely he and Rachel Chandler’s husband Tom Guinness are related, but they are both members of the famous Guinness family. Jack and Tom (OZ on the T-shirt) Guinness:
|
|
Avacyn
Project Manager
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Avacyn on Aug 17, 2019 21:18:14 GMT
My second long post from the David Icke Forum: "Errata: the name of the analysis focus, was inaccurate. Peaches Geldof's full name is Peaches Honeyblossom Geldof, not Peaches Honeysuckle Geldof. Also, the inverted crucifix is between her shoulder-blades, not on the left shoulder-blade. Apologies to be given for these errors.
Given reflection, the eyes closed with the smile in the 'Keep doing your poop thing' could indicate that the woman performing the activity is blind to what she is doing. The camera for documenting could have an alternate meaning.
MK ULTRA was discontinued in the 1950's, however it is safe to assume that it is simply a case of the outdated being phased out, in favour of the more evolved practices. In the 1980s Harmonics came into being, and was utilised to produce subliminal messages in popular music; it is safe to theoretically calculate that another major breakthrough occurred in the Nineties, which meant that people could be reared and shaped from birth to become individuals willing – and perhaps eager – to partake in the agenda. Another innovation would be taking individuals who fit a certain profile, and then condition them, even if they are past their teenage years.
Thus, the drawing could be showing a woman who is consuming faeces could be doing so through an 'alter,' or a splintered fragment of her personality, developed and moulded to fit certain tasks. The caption could indicate that she is expected to carry on this task. The camera for documenting phrase might well be symbolism of the core personality being capable, or has become capable, of witnessing this activity, but is only able to observe or record it, and cannot influence what is happening.
At some point, pigs will need to be properly analysed, given the discovery of image 532414-9d7ce328-bea9-11e3-b362-fbc371d40a1d.jpg. It seems no coincidence.
The ones pulling the strings are certainly looking more and more like victims of the Ewok Effect. In the film 'Return of the Jedi,' the Emperor Palpatine informs Luke Skywalker that he had foreseen through the Force the destruction of the Rebel Alliance, and his turning to the Dark Side. He had seen all his plans come to fruition. However, they did not. Upon careful reflection, the reason is because he had not seen one small event take place, which was ultimately pivotal to the chain of events: the Rebels had made allies with the native Ewoks on Endor.
The result was that the Ewoks assisted when the Rebels were captured, and the sudden ambush of the ambushers meant enough confusion to allow the Rebels to take control of the generator, and destroy the shield protecting the second Death Star. This in turn allowed the rebel fleet to succeed in destroying the station.
The Ewok Effect can be described as thus: a small event, considered trivial or not noticed at the time eventually emerging to overwhelm all plans or events. This seems to be the case right now. The way it has played out has meant a lot of attention was focussed on Peaches Geldof, which was not what they anticipated.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The goddess Andraste, or Andred, was worshipped by the ancient British people, and later by the Anglo-Saxons. She was to the Iceni a war goddess, and the Romans interpreted her as the goddess Victoria, since her name was used as the word for victory. However, the core of her worship was in the great forest called Coed Andred, later Andreds-weald. This is the origin of the name 'The Weald' in southern England today. It was a vast expanse, stretching at its peak from Kent to Hampshire.
In the modern day, parts of the forest are still extant, particularly in Sussex. The Runes of Andred were published in Doreen Valiente's Liber Umbrarum. This magickal alphabet originated with a coven in Sussex, the exact details of which died with Doreen Valiente in 1999. Doreen Valiente was a Wiccan who had been a direct pupil of Gerald B Gardner, the developer of modern day Wicca.
Gerald Gardner did not meet the self styled 'Witch King' Old George Pickingill, who is stated as ruling six covens in England, one being in the New Forest, and one in Sussex. There are claims that Pickingill had met with Crowley, but these claims are now deemed inaccurate.
It is likely that L Ron Hubbard had met Crowley, given the author and eventual founder of Scientology was involved in Thelema in the 1940s.
Crowley was initiated into the OTO – known fully as the Ordo Templi Orientis – in 1910. The OTO was originally modelled after, and associated with European Freemasonry. In 1912, Crowley had risen to leader of the British branch, reshaping it to fit his Thelemite beliefs. He was advanced to the Tenth Degree. He rewrote the initiation rituals of the first three degrees in 1930, leaving the fourth intact.
Membership is based on initiatory system with a series of degree ceremonies that use ritual drama to establish fraternal bonds and impart spiritual and philosophical teachings. Under Theodore Reuss, there were nine degrees, the first first six masonic.
Gardner had been given charter to run OTO camp in England, thought was later dismissed from this due to continuing ill health by Karl Germer. Gardner made much use of Crowley's published material when composing the Gardnerian ritual liturgy, which was eventually edited out by Doreen Valiente when she became the official custodian of the Gardnerian Book of Shadows after his death.
It is important to know these background details, because it is clear that there is a lot of cross-pollination of ideas between different religions, secret societies and cults. Within Wicca, at least in the more traditional Traditions, there are degrees of Initiation, three of them. It also is likely to be largely removed from the original influences, due to key influencers like Valiente and Scott Cunningham.
The connection with the above to Peaches Geldof becomes transparent when her library is considered. Crowley, Witchcraft, Thelema are all subjects in her library. Also worthy to note is the Nag Hammandi Library, which contained a large number of Gnostic tomes. Crowley wrote the Gnostic Mass, a Thelemite ritual that came to be a key part of the OTO liturgy.
Also, earlier in her life, Peaches had been a supporter of Scientology, and there had been a rather curious incident. Closer examination shows that there is more happening than would be initially assumed.
First of all, why was thatcoolguyben staying at a friends place before a trip to South America? And where in South America? It seems strange, unless he had no home of his at the time? But then, how could he afford to go to South America?
How did thatcoolguyben know the friends of Peaches? The only logical explanation is that Ben had the same circle of friends as Peaches. Thus, he clearly possessed wealth, or his family does. Which begs the question... who was Peaches staying with at the time? Clearly a female, judging by the account.
Also, she was leaving early in the morning and coming back late at night? For recording an album? If this was the case, why didn't the album makers go crazy when she didn't appear for recording? Time is money. Also, it seems as if this was a habitual routine for her. She must have been doing this for some time. I doubt it takes more than a few days to record an album, particularly if they are that intensely focussed on recording it. Also, what was this album about? Why did it never surface? There is scant detail on this event, suggesting it may well have been a cover for the actual reasons she was in LA at the time. It was also soon after this time that she started dating Eli Roth, and had met Marilyn Manson at least once.
“She says "have you been living here the whole time I have?" I laughed and thought this question strange, she was showing how oblivious she was to the world.”
- It would not be strange if she had been arriving and leaving in a mind control influenced state. It also highlights that she was having trouble recalling events that had happened to her at that time period. This reinforces the above commentary.
"The tattoo discussion leads to us deciding we should get each others names tattooed on each other."
- You don't get the name of a random stranger you have just met tattooed onto you. However, given the number of names already tattooed onto her by this point, would anyone notice? It also seems a similar theme, where people she has been intimate with ends up with a tattoo referring to them in some way. It is almost like she was being marked, or branded in some way.
"She told me she had a bit of heroin she brought with her from the UK and asked me if I was game."
- How did she manage to get it into America? It also suggests that she had been keeping hold of this heroin for a while... Also, Crowley was a heroin addict, her mother had died of a heroin overdose. Would she really be using a drug that had done so much damage to her life and family? Also, why hadn't she simply acquired the heroin in LA? It would be simpler than smuggling it through US Customs. Could it be that she was using a higher grade of heroin, and it was akin to pharmaceutical grade? She was clearly looking for fresh needles and cotton swabs. This indicates a cleanliness and attention to detail that is not present in the average addict. Also, this incident is the only clear occasion that she took any drugs. It has been speculated, and she has admitted that she dabbled in drugs. However, if she was as notorious a party goer as she was, how come thee are not more stories of her taking drugs?
"This is where things get weird. Close to 8am she starts saying how someone was coming to pick her up."
- To be honest, the entire night's events were weird. However... why was she saying this? If she was getting in at two in the morning, to be picked up at eight, that would mean she would have had four to five hours time to sleep. This is assuming half an hour to an hour either way to prepare for bed and getting up. Also, there is no mention of this fact later on. Where was she supposed to have been going? Also, why did she ask him to drive, if she was waiting for someone to pick her up? They could have driven her anywhere.
Also, they ended up in the Celebrity Scientology Centre. If it took them an hour to get there, given there would have been rush hour traffic to contend with, there is a five hour gap in the events. What had occurred during that time? Also, her alters would not have necessarily been affected by the heroin. Thus, she could have done anything, and not feel the effects. Also, it is highly strange they end up there, when she was clearly being picked up to go somewhere. Perhaps she was supposed to be going to the centre all along? Also, the sex seems to suggest a sex kitten effect suddenly coming into force. Maybe aspects of alters were leaking through to the core personality? It would explain the statement “We did it every way possible, and for a young girl she sure knew how to work it.”
It might well be safe to conclude that Scientology was as big as it was in her life at the time, because she was receiving tutlage in the occult and ritual practices that she would be performing in her life. It is also to be noted that she had no books based on Scientology in her 'Shelfie' picture. She didn't have a copy of Diatanics. It can be suspected that her mystic education was being focussed on an organisation higher up in the hierarchy, namely the OTO.
Agent Provocateur is a UK lingerie company, founded in 1994. It has a curious name, however. An 'agent provocateur' in an individual who is used to incite a chain of events, without showing the group using the individual's involvement in the affair. It is also a company that has had Peaches Geldof model for them a number of times, and was their brand face for a time, replacing Kate Moss. She also prominently featured in their 'Season of the Witch' advertising campaign. Below are included two descriptions of the campaign:
“Agent Provocateur are proud to announce the launch of a decadent new campaign, "Season of the Witch", to incorporate a feast for the senses with a new website, a new catalogue and a new collection of the most luxurious and sexy lingerie.
The first "tableaux vivant" scene from 'The Season of the Witch' features the decadent Daisy Lowe and Peaches Geldof as powerful temptresses, seducing and their virginal victims wearing the most lavish collection of sexy lingerie.” - talktalk.co.uk website.
“Peaches Geldof features in Agent Provocateur’s latest witchy tableaux. The 19 year old daughter of Bob Geldof, who married Max Drummey in Las Vegas last month, stars alongsied Daisy Lowe in an occult-themed shoot that would make Aleister Crowley proud.
Agent Provocateur, quite possibly the world’s hottest lingerie label, is owned and directed by Vivienne Westwood’s son. Whether or not their customers get up to anything close to the adventurous scenarios depicted in this campaign, the label certainly inspires the imagination.” - originally www.thevine.com.au/fashion/ar...ovocateur.aspx
There is a lot of information hidden away in the images, and it would be a disservice to process all of them, given that Peaches is only in some of them, and there is mounting evidence in many other aspects to process. There is a lot of indicators of MK control, with butterflies, leopard print clothes, masks being incorporated in. Focus, however, has to be placed upon one image in particular. This is saved as ap2.jpg. It contains a lot of occult imagery, and would take quite a bit to analyse. There are, however, three fruits being consumed: apple, strawberry and cherry. Cherry could mean innocence, and strawberries are connected historically with purity and innocence, and can in modern times be associated with aphrodesia. Apples are deemed a quite magickal fruit, providing knowledge and wisdom – as depicted by cutting it in half sideways, producing a five pointed star. It also is a sexual fruit, given the centre looks like female genitalia when cut from top to bottom.
There is also an owl swooping down from above, which is interesting. In most cultures they are regarded as symbols of death. In a few others, notably the Greeks, they were regarded as beholders of wisdom as well.
The biggest surprise, however, lies not with what can be seen, but unseen. There are figures that are not revealed until the brightness, saturation and shadow levels are altered dramatically. Mostly, they are above, with a couple on the left side. In this altered state, it makes an individual think more of Dante's Divine Comedy than a lingerie advertisement. It is as if there is an unseen crowd, jeering and egging on the participants in the room below. There is also the silhouette of what looks like curved horns of a demon in the background, with the head blocked by the silhouette of a pillar or something.
It is interesting how the whole shoot has been described by some as “an occult-themed shoot that would make Aleister Crowley proud.” Perhaps, given how he has been instrumental in certain secret and occult organisations that exist to this day, he might be.
One thing that is striking is how both she and her younger sister, Pixie, have both partaken in modelling work for this company.
Another detail is that her hair colour changes markedly over the years. This is notable, because it is the same tones and colours that both Britney Spears and Christina Aguilera have had over the years, along with platinum blonde, which was a favoured colour by not just her mother Paula Yates, but Madonna for a while. Hair holds key mystical significance in terms of length, as it can draw energy in, and act as a spiritual antenna for the universe. This is why the Yogis of India have long hair. It is also the reason why Britney shaved off her hair; she was wanting to get away from the role assigned to her. Now, however, she has probably gone through sufficient number of, and sufficient intensity of, brainwashing sessions that she is highly unlikely to break free again. She was inducted, at the same time as Christina Aguilera, into the priesthood structure of Hollywood during the infamous MTV Award ceremony. The song the two sung was to denote their dedication to the role of priestess, they were assuming the role of Maiden. This is reinforced by the wedding dresses, that they were to be 'married' to their assigned role.
Madonna was passing her role to them; she was being elevated. Not simply because she was proven worthy, but because there was no other option; she had lost a lot of her power over the people. This is demonstrated that her pop resurgence in the late nineties didn't have the same impact as in her earlier career. This was after her audacious mass ritual that is her 'Frozen' music video. It is entirely designed as a ritual spell to draw people to her, to create an increase in following. Whilst it succeeded, it failed to perform to their expectations.
Is it possible to conclude that hair colour denotes stages of initiation? If so, it would seem Peaches had reached a high enough level of initiation to be a powerful element in the priesthood. It would also explain the massive change in her once she had entered a relationship with Tom Cohen. She had entered a Mother stage of her role. Thus, she was moulded as such. Surgery, lifestyle... All for her to be shown performing her critical role, that producing two sons to continue the lineage. The first gift she was given by her husband was a Seal of Solomon. Could this be a symbolic gesture that she had gained 'promotion?'
Additionally, there is the fact she has worn red numerous occasions. Red in ancient times was used to denote royalty in women. This is why Mary Magdalene, of the Hasmosean royal Dynasty, wore red; she was betrothed to her husband, the ancestral king of Israel. This is what Jesus was. Two gospels start off with genealogy retelling, which would be irrelevant if Jesus was literally the Son of God. If his father was literally God, why bother with king lists? They were of importance, because he had to prove his royal lineage; indeed, the crime he was killed for was 'The King Of The International Travellers.' Also, not only was he of the Essene community, he was also a Nazarene, which held strict codes. One of them was to not cut their hair. Samson, a Nazarene, was punished severely when he had been tricked by Delilah into losing his hair; he lost his spiritual, and mystical might. It could be suspected, as a final tangential divesting, that Django Allot is having to go through some form of role-play, having to become a Samson-like figurehead, possibly having to show ritual acceptance of the role in the Savoury Squash advertisement. Fruit of the loin, not of the cloth might be a reference to the sacrifices offered by Cain and Abel.
However, their plans and designs for her were in jeopardy. She had clearly managed to break free sufficiently to realise what was happening to her. Rather than risk overt rebellion, like Britney Spears and Michael Jackson, she set upon an ingenious strategy. She was aware that she would likely never be truly free; indeed, Arizona Wilder seems to have now disappeared. She had stated that they still had plans for her, which was why she was still alive. She was simply to valuable to kill off, even if she was causing massive trouble and disruption. Peaches had become too valuable to the system, and she most likely never manage to escape it. She did, however, want to protect her offspring. Hence Instagram and Twitter, her intrepid initiative. She produced thousands of inane images and comments, carefully inserting into them a number of key and telling posts and pictures. She knew that when the time came, her pictures would be analysed, to figure out the nature of her death.
The Ian Watkins post was what tipped them off that she was silently breaking free of control. They no doubt studied her activities, and realised what she had done. They knew that she was becoming too much of a danger to their plans.
Fortunately, for them, time had run out for her, anyway; it was time for the next big ritual act for her to perform. They needed her to have a ritual death, but it was not to be like Diana, who impacted on the thirteenth column, and had her soul, organs and child ritually harvested and consumed. (However the unborn child is most likely a relic of veneration, like remains of the giant humans are relics of veneration in some Masonic Temples.) Like Arizona Wilder, she was too valuable to simply kill. Thus, in a manner similar to Jesus, her death was staged, and transformed into a ritual play.
She falsely died, then truly died, at least officially. Death has truly occurred, that of her life and identity as Peaches Honeyblossom Geldof Cohen. Just like the priest Simon the Zealot (Zelotes), and his priestly brother, Joeseph of Arimathea, Jesus was secretly saved from death by swift use of International Travelling law trickery and magician sleight of hand. Thus it is with Doctor Peter Jerreat, needing to send the message to those who can understand it, that she is being processed and fully transformed into a full occult priestess for them. Her 'resurrection' is likely to either be on her funeral, or more likely, when there is a date that is the 31st. However, she will likely be presented to a select few, as proof of her return.
Thus, she is a ritual sacrifice, in the sense that to sacrifice means to surrender of give up something. The sacrifice was her identity and life, to be given over to her role entirely.
This would also explain why the family was so calm over her death, because they knew what was destined for her; Bob would have known the moment she was conceived what her life was earmarked for. Pixie no doubt has a minor role, but it is of the two children of the Paula Yates and Bob Geldof lineage, that Peaches was so important. Fifi Trixabelle was to be groomed and trained for her role as conditioner and handler of victims to the successors to the MK ULTRA program, hence the ritualistic placing of her along with him. The Live eight picture shows that Peaches was excluded, almost as if she was being cast out like the Scapegoats of International Travelling tradition; casting all of the sins onto the animal, then casting it out of the community. It might explain her time in LA, a scapegoating period. It might also symbolise the time that Jesus spent in the desert.
Analysis of the Live eight photo also shows that the eyes of Peaches and Pixie are glazed, almost as if under hypnotic control. Peaches is also wearing red. She is leaning curiously, away from her family, Pixie towards Bob. A suggestion of the scapegoating division, perhaps? Fifi looks relatively normal, however facial and eye analysis indicates that there is something darker under the surface. The most fascinating individual in the picture is...
Heavenly Hiraani Tiger Lily Huchence.
When careful consideration is given, she is responding to the photo-call in a manner expected of a normal child. There is no evidence – at all – of any mind control. Hiraani is Sanskrit, and when translated, and placed in context of her full name, means 'Heavenly Gold Tiger Lily Huchence.' This is not a name like the other siblings; this is a title, a statement. Paula and Michael managed to have a child outside the system, and fought desperately hard to keep her insulated from the horrors that could befall her. Gold, it should be noted, is seen as incorruptible, as it cannot tarnish or corrode. This child was seen by her parents as the golden flower of their union. Nowadays, she is referred to as an animal, in keeping with the dehumanising. However, she is very much a wild card to the design, and they are perfectly aware of it.
Thus, two examples of the Ewok Effect might be evident; Peaches' social media usage, and the Golden Lily.
On a final note, it is also interesting to note that the age of Anita Debney at time of her 'death' was 52, and Bob Geldof was 61."Thought this old article might shed some light, and maybe give us some new leads?
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,278
|
Post by UnseenI on Aug 18, 2019 7:27:45 GMT
I said in my summary a while back that the PG thread on the DIF was 177 pages long.
It still is, but now there is only one post on page 177 and in the past there were more.
So I agree that some posts have indeed been deleted.
I had a quick look at a few snapshots on Wayback and couldn’t find more than a few pages of the thread. I am not obsessive enough to check that all my posts are still there!
Maybe they are worried about legal action.
|
|
Avacyn
Project Manager
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Avacyn on Aug 18, 2019 22:17:03 GMT
I find it strange, and I don't trust them - from personal experience.
I need to get some of the info back on this thread, I feel. Maybe now, with all the new developments on everything, we can finally make more progress...
|
|
|
Post by magpiejack on Dec 26, 2019 17:44:09 GMT
The move to Wrotham
Peaches and her family moved from London to Wrotham in Kent in October 2013. Another old post: “Also, why did she decide to - with her family - go to Wrotham?” Avacyn the official reason for moving to Kent was to get away from the London party scene (and its associated bad company I assume) and escape all the attention from the tabloids. Peaches had childhood memories of living in Kent, so that was a good reason to go there. It is reasonable to assume that fresh air, greenery and more space were attractions too. She is alleged to have said that London is not a good place to bring up children. Five bedrooms seem a bit excessive though, at least to someone like me - I live in a studio flat. Maybe there would be more privacy in a place like that – or would comings and goings and strangers be more visible in a small village? I wouldn't know about that. Maybe Peaches was on the level with her explanations; maybe they were all just rationalisations and cover stories. There could well be other, more sinister reasons for the move. I've just been reading through this thread - it's strange how so many photos are no longer available. They - whoever they are - must be doing a thorough clean-up job. I can honestly say, after years of living in villages, that everyone knows everything that's going on in a village. They just keep it amongst themselves. You're far more anonymous when living in a town or city
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,278
|
Post by UnseenI on Dec 27, 2019 7:57:39 GMT
"Might also sneak a visit to Wrotham, to see if there is anything useful to observe." Did you ever make that visit Avacyn?
|
|
Avacyn
Project Manager
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Avacyn on Dec 29, 2019 20:45:33 GMT
No, not yet. Will likely be a couple of months time, to be honest. Wait for the spring, to have better weather and more daylight. It would also allow time to start planning out locations to visit, and reasons to visit. I can think of a reason or two to visit the village, aside from this topic!
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,278
|
Post by UnseenI on Mar 1, 2020 18:58:15 GMT
The Yorks and the Geldofs Avacyn I didn’t expect that there would be much more to add to this thread, but the current investigation of the Yorks has reminded me that Sarah Ferguson and her daughters were friends with the Geldofs. We mentioned this relationship on the old forum; it could do with being looked at again in the light of what we have since learned about the Yorks’ relationships with Epstein and Weinstein and her billionaire ‘friends’ etc. As mentioned elsewhere, Sarah Ferguson attended Bob Geldof’s wedding in 2015. She also came to Peaches’ funeral. Arriving for the funeral at Faversham: Princess Eugenie with Bob and his wife Jeanne Marine:
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,278
|
Post by UnseenI on Mar 1, 2020 19:01:07 GMT
Peaches and Princess Beatrice
An article from 2007 shows Peaches playing croquet with peaches for a modelling assignment and mentions Princess Beatrice as her friend: “Two of the London social scene's bright young things have been making moves into the fashion world. Girl about town Peaches Geldof has modelled for a cool Australian label, while her pal Princess Beatrice is drawing up plans for her own clothing range.” www.hellomagazine.com/fashion/2007/09/10/peaches-geldof/
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,278
|
Post by UnseenI on Mar 2, 2020 8:40:57 GMT
Bob Geldof mentions the past
Bob Geldof gave an interview two days ago - he had a new album and tour to promote - in which he talks about Peaches and his grandsons. He mentions things that remind me of topics on the old forum. Do you remember all those dog references Avacyn? I need to find some time to digest it all and look at my old posts. A recent picture:
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,278
|
Post by UnseenI on Mar 2, 2020 18:20:10 GMT
Sarah Ferguson and Peaches
Reading about Sarah Ferguson’s habitual big announcements of new enterprises followed by disaster or a failure to get off the ground reminded me that Peaches played a similar game. I made a long, detailed list with timelines for the old forum of all the things that she said she was going to do or attempted without success to do. Just one example from memory is that she announced that she had signed a deal to write a book of short stories for children but it came to nothing - when asked how it was coming along she said that her computer had been stolen and she had no backup! Sarah Ferguson has also had a book deal or two that came to nothing. Another similarity is their sometimes distracted appearance and behaviour. Bob Geldof said this about Peaches recently: “... she was always a frantic child as a little baby. She couldn’t sleep. And that continued all through her infancy.” “There was always that franticness, that constant panic in the eyes.” www.dailymail.co.uk/home/event/article-8051105/Bob-Geldof-time-right-new-Boomtown-Rats-album.htmlI posted this DM comment about Sarah Ferguson in the Royal thread: "...’always short of cash.’ But why? It's as if she's being interminably blackmailed or something and can't keep up with the payments! Always seems so restless and desperate...”
|
|
UnseenI
Eternal Member
"Part Of The Furniture"
Keeping on keeping on
Posts: 8,278
|
Post by UnseenI on Mar 3, 2020 8:53:42 GMT
Sarah Ferguson and Bob Geldof
There have been many online comments over the years about Bob Geldof’s rough and dishevelled appearance. I have seen a few similar remarks about Sarah Ferguson. A DM commenter said, “...she is just so rough-looking.” Together at an awards ceremony in 2009:
|
|